Keen Blade
Look Sharp !
Dropping him at Leeds would have been sensible - O'Hare is never a player for a scrap , far too easily brushed off the ball.It's incredible that Wilder started him at Leeds tbh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Dropping him at Leeds would have been sensible - O'Hare is never a player for a scrap , far too easily brushed off the ball.It's incredible that Wilder started him at Leeds tbh
Sadly we can all see this with our eyes…He simply isn’t up the task in the all important No10 position. Especially when a player of Hamer’s ability is languishing out on the wing.Dropping him at Leeds would have been sensible - O'Hare is never a player for a scrap , far too easily brushed off the ball.
Exactly this. Madness he started over JRS, even with that formation. Couldn't believe he came out for the second half.Dropping him at Leeds would have been sensible - O'Hare is never a player for a scrap , far too easily brushed off the ball.
There's a thread called "Callum O'Hare" which is clue number 1.Where? I searched before I started one. Couldn’t see anything directly related to O’Hare’s performances. Point it out please and ask to get it merged. If not then shut the fuck up!
There is one i can see at the moment still live and read soon after the game on Friday. You are one crazy bladeWhere? I searched before I started one. Couldn’t see anything directly related to O’Hare’s performances. Point it out please and ask to get it merged. If not then shut the fuck up!
In that case, put Louis Marsh in there. Designed for the role and a full on Blade too.Was so hoping for a Mark Duffy type of player, who used to run at defenders with the ball into the box. Unfortunately O’Hare does seem a little bit lightweight.
I do wonder where Wilder intended to play him, as the No10 role doesn’t really seem to suit him.
In that case, put Louis Marsh in there. Designed for the role and a full on Blade too.
Put O’Hare on the bench so he can see what’s expected of him?
I don’t feel I’m setting myself up as some sort of master tactician here in suggesting, when fit, why don’t we just swap Hamer and O’Hare around.I've made the point in games prior to Friday that O'Hare has been ineffective. He seems to just disappear a lot of the time, which is something that can happen to players in that #10 role/position, but it's happening with alarming regularity.
I felt that he, and the team as a whole, would benefit far more from swapping O'Hare and Hamer around positionally. Hamer is a central midfielder, of that there is no doubt. He's much more of a complete package than O'Hare, and so would be much more effective if played centrally. His passing is better, he's more willing to have a shot, and his movement off the ball is better as well. Hamer would almost certainly link up with Moore better too, which then can lead to improved performances for Moore to boot.
O'Hare seems to just drift around, looking for space where there is none, and is overly keen on just having a kickabout with his best mate Hamer. He's meant to be a focal point of the attack in the central position, yet when he gets the ball, I expect nothing, and I'm still disappointed.
While I think he could be performing better, I think part of his poor performances is a tactical problem. Every team is playing with at least one defensive midfielder, and the combination of midfielders closing in from behind him, and the defence pushing up in front, means he is repeatedly being left with nowhere to go. Hamer would handle this better were he in the middle, and if O'Hare were to play off the left instead, he'd have more space to work with, and would be more free to make some penetrative runs in behind, which is a large part of what made him so successful for Coventry. He was able to get behind the defence as a whole, or isolate one individual. He's struggling to do that now because he's being asked to play in the most congested area of the pitch.
I don’t feel I’m setting myself up as some sort of master tactician here in suggesting, when fit, why don’t we just swap Hamer and O’Hare around.
Hamer is all action and likes to get into the physical side of things. To me that makes him far more suitable to play centrally, plus he’s our best player. You want him on the ball as much as possible.
O’Hare seems to enjoy the freedom to drift around and flit from wide to central. He’d seem far better in an inverted wide role where he can drift in angling into the penalty area.
Marshy lacks a bit of pace as well but he has all the attributes to be a number 10 ! Really good football brain ! reads the game really well.In that case, put Louis Marsh in there. Designed for the role and a full on Blade too.
Put O’Hare on the bench so he can see what’s expected of him?
He's been crap but Wilder will persist with him as he is stubborn
I can’t disagree. I was so excited when we’d captured O’Hares signature in the summer, he was supposed to be the icing on the Wilder cake. But I think it’s this that makes his less than impressive start to the season all the more disappointing…Maybe we should have tempered our expectations a little bit.In that case, put Louis Marsh in there. Designed for the role and a full on Blade too.
Put O’Hare on the bench so he can see what’s expected of him?
O'Hare did play on the left vs Luton. Brewster played centrally behind Moore.I don’t feel I’m setting myself up as some sort of master tactician here in suggesting, when fit, why don’t we just swap Hamer and O’Hare around.
Hamer is all action and likes to get into the physical side of things. To me that makes him far more suitable to play centrally, plus he’s our best player. You want him on the ball as much as possible.
O’Hare seems to enjoy the freedom to drift around and flit from wide to central. He’d seem far better in an inverted wide role where he can drift in angling into the penalty area.
Worth a try, and even if it doesn't work out with Marsh, we may find out if coming on as sub against tiring defender can help kick start O'Hare's season.Marshy lacks a bit of pace as well but he has all the attributes to be a number 10 ! Really good football brain ! reads the game really well.
It's whether he can cope with the physicality of championship football yet as he is still a bit lightweight . Worth a punt as nothing coming through O'Hare, being benched might just give him a push to win a shirt back.
Making too many changes also tends not to work for us. If we have a few enforced, we’re probably just as well keeping him there for now.He's far far from crap. And he's one of the main reasons we have 20pts so far, his pressing from the front is as good as any pressing you see and must not be underestimated. It enables us to get up the pitch and rushes their goalie.
Didn't have a great at Leeds who did apart from Vini?
Drop him for Marsh or Brewster - what insanity is that FFS.
For me revert back to what wasn't broke- change Vini for Peck - give it a go tonight- might lose but hey ho doing better than most thought anyway.
Leave O Hare where he is.
Totally agree- I think Chris has done a fantastic job this season - but he over thought the Leeds match - it's not even being clever after the fact- when most folk saw Shackleton and RND at 7pm Friday - their immediate thoughts were WTF?Making too many changes also tends not to work for us. If we have a few enforced, we’re probably just as well keeping him there for now.
Thought RND played well and made a differenceTotally agree- I think Chris has done a fantastic job this season - but he over thought the Leeds match - it's not even being clever after the fact- when most folk saw Shackleton and RND at 7pm Friday - their immediate thoughts were WTF?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?