FallowfieldBlade
The Names Blade Fallowfield Blade
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2019
- Messages
- 6,365
- Reaction score
- 7,729
- Banned
- #121
where have u seen he's our #1 target?
Nixon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
where have u seen he's our #1 target?
The thing with McGoldrick is that he’s pretty decent playing with his back to goal, as you say, he holds it up in the final third. He’s a proper striker who drops into midfield, not an attacking midfielder who moves forward to join the attack.Fair enough, I respect your opinion. Eze, I accept, has an excellent skill set. He's explosive, has power, pace and trickery. He's certainly got immense potential. What I haven't seen from him is the footballing intelligence and workrate of McGoldrick.
McGoldrick puts in huge defensive shifts, he glides all over the field, picking the ball up in pockets of space and gets us up the field. He's then able to hold the ball in the final third, slow play down and allow us to get numbers up field. He rarely scores, or assists - but the value he brings to our play is huge.
I see very few players, even in the Premier League, who can do what McGoldrick does. Eze, from the games I've seen, doesn't have that ability.
I think the best realistic option to play the McGoldrick role is Hwang Hee-Chan at RB Salzburg.He’s the closest thing to mcgoldrick I’ve seen and is as good and only 21.
Seen that he’s our no1 target whether we’d be able to get him I don’t know. Depends if bigger teams are after him.
Do you know him ? How could you possibly know ehrte he will go ?No way Eze leaves London for Sheffield. Not going to happen. If he does go it'll be Palace, Spurs, Arsenal or, if they go up, Brentford
McGoldrick is a better player right now for our system than Eze, but over the next 5 years you'd take Eze 100% of the time
Fine. If a top 4 club comes in and says he'll start for them he'll go thereDo you know him ? How could you possibly know ehrte he will go ?
Are you saying he would knock back Liverpool ,man city ,Everton or man yoo If Millwall come in for him ?
Even if its not in London ?Fine. If a top 4 club comes in and says he'll start for them he'll go there
You win, my original post was incorrect. He'll definitely sign for usEven if its not in London ?
Don't want him anywayYou win, my original post was incorrect. He'll definitely sign for us
would he pass CW's knobhead test?
Madine some how passed that test. Adams would be great at 10 mill.The "nobhead test" is what I'm not sure on.
The Duffy role.I don't see where Eze would play in Utd's team.
The Duffy role.
Alright!
Because we don't have Duffy (since he went postal) or that type of player.Yes, alright - apart of course that Utd haven't played with the role all season
Because we don't have Duffy (since he went postal) or that type of player.
Not even (IMO of course) as good as Duffy, more of a winger and that really is a formation we don't really play.Freeman?
Not even (IMO of course) as good as Duffy, more of a winger and that really is a formation we don't really play.
You never find your true calling till you pitch up at the Lane!Which is weird because Freeman has never really played as a winger and Duffy played most of his career as one.
You never find your true calling till you pitch up at the Lane!
He might be able to, but we don’t play with a “duffy role” any more.On that basis how come Freeman can't play the Duffy role?
He might be able to, but we don’t play with a “duffy role” any more.
Hasn't got a good enough skill set. Can't beat a man like Duffy* or Eze or even Fleck but his crossing is decent.On that basis how come Freeman can't play the Duffy role?
We would (not all the time) if we had somebody who could competently play it without weakening the team (I feel Fleck could probably play this role).He might be able to, but we don’t play with a “duffy role” any more.
We don’t know if freeman is competent there or not, McGoldrick probably could play there (his role is but surely if we were going to play with a “duffy role” we wouldn’t have loaned out duffy.We would (not all the time) if we had somebody who could competently play it without weakening the team (I feel Fleck could probably play this role).
I'd say that he isn't used there indicates the manager doesn't think he's good enough for it.We don’t know if freeman is competent there or not
I’d say we play a formation that doesn’t have a “Duffy role” any more so he can’t play there.I'd say that he isn't used there indicates the manager doesn't think he's good enough for it.
It would be neglectful to limit your options for the sake of it, I'd say it's because we don't have the players for it but if Eze signed he'd be ideal.I’d say we play a formation that doesn’t have a “Duffy role” any more so he can’t play there.
He would be a good signing, he looks a good player with a lot of potential but for the money he would cost he would have to be a starter. With the clubs sniffing around him you would assume £20m +£50k per weekIt would be neglectful to limit your options for the sake of it, I'd say it's because we don't have the players for it but if Eze signed he'd be ideal.
He’s the closest thing to mcgoldrick I’ve seen and is as good and only 21.
Seen that he’s our no1 target whether we’d be able to get him I don’t know. Depends if bigger teams are after him.
I'd say this was on the nail, we'd have to get those wages down (and or TF) Mr Bettis over to you.With the clubs sniffing around him you would assume £20m +£50k per week
I was championing Bowen in the Summer transfer window(more as a straight striker though), think Wilder had been quoted 20m and West Ham reportedly got him for 18m. I wouldn't have paid over 10m back in Summer and I don't think he's done enough yet to say he's worth any more.Jarrod Bowen was the perfect long term Didzy replacement IMO with the added bonus of goals as well.
I'd say that he isn't used there indicates the manager doesn't think he's good enough for it.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?