Newspapers on Wolves Game

[Tinoblade]

The Majority of papers i have read said we did not deserve the win on saturday

Where as i toatlly disagree!

Has anyone else read any of these reports?

 

[Bladesman]

I havnt although it sounds like they were at the wrong game.

Like fuck Wolves ruled the match they played well but didnt do enough.

We had the quality upfront to win.

 

[TonyAgana]

3-1 flattered us but:

...It was ok last season for MOTD pundits to say that we worked hard but lacked quality to win the game.

...This season we've got the quality up front to win games so bullocks to newspapers. If we've got the quality to win then we DESERVED TO FECKING WIN!!! :rant:

 

[stuie01]

Its hard to say really because for the 1st 20-25mins we were by far the better team and could of been at least 2-0 up then they scored through lack of concentration from then to half time they were the better side - after half time we were good they were unlucky they could of scored after each of our goals but didnt overall i think we deserved to win we had a bit of luck but had quality too and finished off the game

UTB !!!

 

[happyhippy]

We shaded it. Speaking to a few Dogheads afterwards we all agreed that we were the better side, but 3-1 flattered us slightly.

 

[shorehamview]

The newspapers can say we should have been thrashed 0-10 if they like. We won, so bugger 'em.

 

[chrisyb99]

when has anyone ever nown papers to talk anything over than crap? let them say what they want n wel concentrate on winning n get back to our rightful place among the countries best (Does NOT include west sham)

 

[Gazza1984]

first 20 minutes there was only one team in it then wolves came back into the game and scored a goal
then the 2nd half we showed up and it was us shading it.

Not bothered what the papers say at the end of the day it will say Sheff U 3 Wolves 1... it wont say Sheff U 3 wolves 1 but wolves were better.