My take ...

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Why has pompey selected the Olympic ice dancing marking system .
6.5 and 7.5 and as mean as a Russian judge marking a yank.
Bet he's sat wearing a scarf and ear muffs20220221_002010.jpg
 
Last edited:
Why has pompey selected the Olympic ice dancing marking system .
6.5 and 7.5 and as mean as a Russian judge marking a yank.
Bet he's sat wearing a scarf and ear muffsView attachment 130849

I don't know what the flying fuck you're on about, feller.

pommpey
 
Good post Pomps. Glad we gave the Swans a good hiding. Never forgiven them for dumping us out of the cup in ..? under Warnock , when he appeared at half-time with a suit on.
2007. FA Cup third round at home during Warnock's Premier League season. They were in League One at the time and we were awful.
 
I had a dream last week that I had played for United, a match in which I not only scored, but also had an assist, yet my mark was a mere 2. I'm not sure who had given the marks but I attempted to tell everyone it wasn't so bad as the marks were out of 5. You know you've got problems when even in your dreams friends take the piss, and it wasn't long before someone pointed out to me that if it was out of 5, double it to be out of 10 and I still only got 4. Someone else then told me it was indeed out of 10 and I had ammassed a glorious 2.

I woke up in an indignant rage, and rightly so. At least pommps would have given me 2.5 out of 10.
 
Adding 0.5 to all Pomp's scores would be "my take" on that performance, but deducting 1 or 2 (at least) from anyone's assessment of Swansea's performance would be about right too, just as long as their manager was rated below zero.
 
Sally Webster got a 7/10 last night from Christopher Dean and she didn't even complete the judges challenge by herself . Yet he gave Bezz a 4.0 and he completed the jumps by himself.

I was incandescent with rage as she was only worthy of a 3.75 at the most - perhaps a 3.80 at a push and i would have given Bezz a 5.23 as he always gives 102.94%

All about opinions and we all cant be right 100% of the time.- unless you`re Silent
 
no dont see the need to introduce half points ae 1 to 10 gives a wide enough scope to mark players
if someones been a bit better than a 7 surely an 8 is the logical step

You do understand maths, and the phenomenon of personal opinion, don't you?

Tell you what, old feller. Post your own marks out of ten up, instead of finding it extremely necessary to pick other people up (not as you'd expect, with a counter argument about player performance in the game supplied with personal evidence - like a lot of others do) but because of the methods they use. How fucking eventful the shit must be in that smooth, grey organ parked in your bonce. Do you spot trains or play Top Trumps, by chance?

And for your information, rounding up a performance just a shade above seven to eight is the work of a dullard. The half marks will stay. If it pisses you off that much, go read Deadbat. Oh, hang on, he uses half marks too (yet I don't see you rooering in his match report threads)

pommpey
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom