My take ...

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Another good, convincing win for us as we take firm steps toward the playoff zone. Given when Slav was here this position was unthinkable, it's real credit to Hecky and the chaps for beating a team who comprehensively penised us at their place earlier in the season. Many of us - me included - have to eat humble pie over the appointment of Hecky. It seems last season's makeshift temporary appointment was just a stop gap and there were not real efforts to allow Hecky to bring his own ideas in and optimise the 5-3-2 into some sort of challenging formula. Would we have survived if we had this season's team as of today just as Wilder was sacked? Maybe not. The gulf in class between PL and tonight's opponents was very evident. West Brom, under Steve Bruce still look a typical Bruce side - lumpen and unfluid. They have a long way to go and I would be surprised to see them in the top six by May given tonight's poor showing.

Our lineup was the typical 'one of surprises'. No place for Goode, back comes C3PO, back comes Hourihane and a great comeback for Furious George who must have been eating raw steak on the touchline watching Bogle steal his boots. We started dead cagey, being pressed back into our half and final third at times and unable to break out. Every time it did, West Brom capably mopped things up and came back at us but credit where credit is, we weathered the brief storm. Our first really came from nowhere but it was a typical Billy goal where not even half a chance will do for him to find the net. Fallowfield, pay attention. He did make a bollock of his second chance and was given offside for his disallowed but his acumen as a striker, his experience in making defenders work hard and his eye for a chance is still razor sharp. At the other end Furious pulled off a fucking breathtaking last ditch tackle and then WBA are down to ten after a daft lunge by Livermore which, if Flecky went for a bath for that one he did a couple of seasons ago at BDTBL, then he should go for that. We're not good against ten though are we? Second half it looked like they'd been allowed a player back for the first twenty and we again struggled to stop them coming forward. We simply failed to make 'the hole' on the pitch count and outpass the opposition. If we did string passes together at times the final one was overplayed (Norwood) or ended up in no man's land out wide where WBA just jockeyed us.

Second goal however was borne of some nice play with better passing and we managed to get the ball into an area where MGW was moving to attack and probably score and Billy simply crashed it into the net. Fallowfield take note. After that WBA just tried to pump the ball long to Carroll who'd tried and failed to bully out centrebacks. We managed the game out to a pretty convincing conclusion.

Foderingham 6/10: Not a massive amount for him to do once again but pick low shots off the deck. At times a bit iffy with punches but in those moments they did sent their big fellers up
Baldock 7.5/10: Great return for George even if he was well out of position. Plenty of energy and a brilliant goal saving tackle
Robinson 6/10: Steady game with some key headers and interceptions when we came under pressure and less errors. But he's still not JOC
Egan 7/10: Put himself about against a big strong lad like Carrol and in my humble opinion won most of the battles preventing him from having any effect
Basham 7/10: Sometimes ace, sometimes (rarely) a bit lacking. Was skinned by Grant a couple of times which was unusual
Bogle 6.5/10: Not quite as industrious as of late. Think he was hiding an injury for much of the game. Still works well with players around him but tonight he lacked a bit of sparkle. Picked up a needless yellow
Norwood 6.5/10: Still playing quarterback but now has his Hollywood Ball programming updated so less of that and more movement. A pretty 'okay' game from him
Hourihane 6/10: Sent in a great cross for Billy's disallowed goal but didn't impose much even when they went down to ten men. In that situation, players like him should be free roaming and providing the option to exploit the 'hole'
McGoldrick 6.5/10: Not a vintage Didsy performance. He did link well with all around and calmed the play somewhat but he's losing what vestige of effect he used to have. Hope his injury isn't serious however. He is best 'off the bench' in a match these days
N'Daiye 6.5/10: Has plenty of capability but at times can be wasteful.
Sharp 7.5/10: Got goals from 50% of the clear cut chances he had and that will do. Drops a whole half mark for the one he hit straight at Johnstone

MGW 6.5/10: instantly involved and eager to muscle his way back in. It's nice to see competition in the squad and him involved in it and the creation of goals.
McBurnie 5/10: Was 'okay' but nothing spectacular and with less impact than the last game. But at least we now know he has stopped shithousing
Berge (unmarked) Don't think he touched the ball (quelle surprise)

Great win for us. Three points, now within spitting distance of a decent finish.

Onwards to Hudds on Satdi.

pommpey

Good report. still not sure where Bogle fits in if Furious is playing.
I thought Didzy was the best player on the pitch up to his injury
Furious deserves his place - so does Bogle - what next?
I thought the red was a yellow, but glad to see the back of him, he was a bit of a unit for us to deal with
Bash' needs a rest, I think Goode will come in on Saturday
Saturday will be a tougher game than last nights for sure
Can't think of anything else! Oh, I also thought Robinson had a good game.
 



We were 1 nil up and looking much better than the first 20 mins when Livermore got sent off. We often start slowly. Second half was a weird performance because despite us giving them 50 free kicks and throw ins around our box they didn't do anything with them. As comfortable as a game against a play off rival gets for me.

I'd said just before we scored that they were going to get a goal, but then a chance fell to Billy and he did what you'd expect the top striker at the club to do and scored.

We were poor until West Brom gifted us the game

We were poor because we were playing with a Left-Back who doesn't have a right foot and a Centre back in Robinson who gives the ball away every other pass

Bad team selection from Hecky and he got away with it because WBA gifted us the game IMO

Just an opinion derek
 
I don't think many are giving this side the credit it deserves.8 wins in 10 isnt luck or down to opponents under performing.
We are passing better and have gone back to being aggressive in closing down and going forwards rather than sideways.
The second goal was a tremendous team goal. In the West Brom fans thoughts thread one or 2 thanked their keeper for keeping the score down. 25 points from 30 is a fabulous return

If we don't think that's a good run we are expecting a little too much
It should have been 27 from 30 though, that Preston game still annoys me.
 
We were poor until West Brom gifted us the game

We were poor because we were playing with a Left-Back who doesn't have a right foot and a Centre back in Robinson who gives the ball away every other pass

Bad team selection from Hecky and he got away with it because WBA gifted us the game IMO

Just an opinion derek
Play RND against Huddersfield we look a lot more balanced
 
We were poor until West Brom gifted us the game

We were poor because we were playing with a Left-Back who doesn't have a right foot and a Centre back in Robinson who gives the ball away every other pass

Bad team selection from Hecky and he got away with it because WBA gifted us the game IMO

Just an opinion derek
I never realised we had a one footed player !!!
It's amazing what the national Health can do these days....... :rolleyes:
 
We were poor until West Brom gifted us the game

We were poor because we were playing with a Left-Back who doesn't have a right foot and a Centre back in Robinson who gives the ball away every other pass

Bad team selection from Hecky and he got away with it because WBA gifted us the game IMO

Just an opinion derek

Can't agree on them 'gifting us the game'

We were already 1-0 up when he went. WBA did look 'capable' but that is no guarantee. We chucked a credible lead away versus Preston don't forget. They didn't gift us anything. Unless you have your shit together, playing against ten men can be a world of frustration which end up in you conceding. WBA still made us work at the beginning of the second half, didn't they? We failed if anything to make one central player - I would say Hourihane as the mobile midfielder who 'exploits the gap' a sending off creates, usually when on the counter and they have committed players forward leaving Norwood deep as he linked with Ndaiye to shift the ball toward Sharp. At times WBA made it look like they had 11 on the pitch which needs looking at, so I reject this baseless 'the sending off was the only reason they lost' inference. It overlooks a lot of other factors, the key one being the pleasing amount of movement and passing which led up to our second which involved MGW and McBurnie.

pommpey
 
I passed GCSE Maths if thats what you are referring too
I'll be the first to admit that Mathematics isn't my favourite subject, but unless you surmised that collectively the Blades weren't as effective as they were individually, then your overall score of 5.5 is 16.5% short of what it should be (based on your individual ratings). It's a good job for us that Billy plays his percentages more effectively!
 
Can't agree on them 'gifting us the game'

We were already 1-0 up when he went. WBA did look 'capable' but that is no guarantee. We chucked a credible lead away versus Preston don't forget. They didn't gift us anything. Unless you have your shit together, playing against ten men can be a world of frustration which end up in you conceding. WBA still made us work at the beginning of the second half, didn't they? We failed if anything to make one central player - I would say Hourihane as the mobile midfielder who 'exploits the gap' a sending off creates, usually when on the counter and they have committed players forward leaving Norwood deep as he linked with Ndaiye to shift the ball toward Sharp. At times WBA made it look like they had 11 on the pitch which needs looking at, so I reject this baseless 'the sending off was the only reason they lost' inference. It overlooks a lot of other factors, the key one being the pleasing amount of movement and passing which led up to our second which involved MGW and McBurnie.

pommpey

It wasn't the only reason they lost the sending off , but it was a key reason

Im not saying we would have definitely lost or won without the red or the fortuitous goal ( you make your own luck of course )

We have got a bad habbit recently of been awful in fist half's so who knows

All this oh it was a masterstroke by Hecky im not so sure tbh Baldock looked uncomfortable on the Left and add Robinson to that is a recipe for disaster

Norwood & Hourihane did Ok but im still not convinced as a pair , they cant keep the ball under pressure as that first half showed got to play Berge IMO but it would appear hecky thinks differently
 
I'll be the first to admit that Mathematics isn't my favourite subject, but unless you surmised that collectively the Blades weren't as effective as they were individually, then your overall score of 5.5 is 16.5% short of what it should be (based on your individual ratings). It's a good job for us that Billy plays his percentages more effectively!

Multiply this 0 2 1 do 1
 



Bit of Baldock bashing going off on this thread , thought he had decent game plus that tackle and his assist !
 
It wasn't the only reason they lost the sending off , but it was a key reason

Im not saying we would have definitely lost or won without the red or the fortuitous goal ( you make your own luck of course )

We have got a bad habbit recently of been awful in fist half's so who knows

All this oh it was a masterstroke by Hecky im not so sure tbh Baldock looked uncomfortable on the Left and add Robinson to that is a recipe for disaster

Norwood & Hourihane did Ok but im still not convinced as a pair , they cant keep the ball under pressure as that first half showed got to play Berge IMO but it would appear hecky thinks differently
I agree with you about baldock, he looked uncomfortable but i think hecky played him there to stop their biggest threat which is furlong either crossing or throw-ins. I doubt he will play there on Saturday. I believe the best midfield pairing is Norwood and Hourihane, they complement each other well and look after the ball and hourihane looks forward alot more than fleck would and berge looks lost wherever he plays
 
I agree with you about baldock, he looked uncomfortable but i think hecky played him there to stop their biggest threat which is furlong either crossing or throw-ins. I doubt he will play there on Saturday. I believe the best midfield pairing is Norwood and Hourihane, they complement each other well and look after the ball and hourihane looks forward alot more than fleck would and berge looks lost wherever he plays

I disagree with hourihane and Norwood the first half is proof of that they were both over ran by WBA

Berge is miles better than both it’s bonkers that we are playing two 30+ midfielders ahead of him 🤷‍♂️
 
I disagree with hourihane and Norwood the first half is proof of that they were both over ran by WBA

Berge is miles better than both it’s bonkers that we are playing two 30+ midfielders ahead of him
yeah i agree he's better than them individually but as a duo with norwood he looks lost, he runs around like a headless chicken
 
I disagree with hourihane and Norwood the first half is proof of that they were both over ran by WBA

Berge is miles better than both it’s bonkers that we are playing two 30+ midfielders ahead of him 🤷‍♂️
Look at the build up to the goals ,how many touches Norwood and Hourihane have . Berge would have either hidden or slowed us down , Theres a reason we dont play well when he plays.
 
Look at the build up to the goals ,how many touches Norwood and Hourihane have . Berge would have either hidden or slowed us down , Theres a reason we dont play well when he plays.
Just like he did when he set Sharp's equaliser up at St Andrew's. Slowed it right down.
 
On current form Ollie is our best midfielder by a country mile. Didn't think I'd be saying that a month or so ago either, he's been pretty much excellent for 7 or 8 of the last 10.
 
Fucking hell excuse number 40026. Its Norwoods fault hes a headless chicken
I'll ask you again after berge playing in his preferred position... what does he bring to the team than norwood doesnt?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom