My take ...

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

pommpey

THE FUTURE ... AS IT USED TO BE
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
9,261
Reaction score
26,531
Location
South Coast
We've played two promoted sides now and in Leeds we encountered a side fully prepared - as we were last season - to throw caution to the wind and adapt and take the challenge on face first. They've also brought players in who are PL ready and can in fact mix it with the best. Fulham on the other hand are playing the cautious, Norwich style game of 'look at us how lucky we are to be in the big league' and their team and strategy says the same. They were the best way for us to salvage something out of what has been a pretty dismal start to our second term in the top flight and to me, three points today weren't simply a nice to have thing - it was essential. Okay,some teams are better placed to go down than us (on paper) but we are still getting it so wrong in many areas on the pitch and that reflects on the single, some-would-say undeserved point we salvaged today.

Quite simply, we are suffering from a type of 'long COVID'. Since the return from lockdown with some rare exceptions, we have been punchless, devoid of ideas and guile and looking the relegation fodder we always (secretly) thought we were. We are wheezy, slow and needing the oxygen of inspiration. It came in rare instances today, mainly at the deft, developing feet of Sander Berge who is slowly stamping his mark on a team who are now looking like they are beneath him.

The formation is dogeared and familiar and needs a revamp. Wilder (if not already) needs to be looking at something different because clearly we are being snuffed out, even by more basic teams like Fulham. If the last few games of last season and the first two minutes of this season didn't ring enough alarm bells then I don't know what will. I see many posters on here giving it the 'what's up wi thee?' when people point out the bleedin' obvious. What is obvious is that we will now be seriously in the struggle until next spring, and if nothing changes, relegated by Easter. It's as basic as that. We can't keep relying on the central three, already one Musketeer down (for a long time and how long until he's back at performance status?) to play the 'overlapping centre back' game whilst oppositions now press back and one of the three isn't set up to do this effectively. We can't rely on both wingbacks doing their touchline marauding whilst the areas are now full of defenders. Our midfield is pitifully weak, yet Wilder keeps picking the same setup, which has the same effect. And our attack is toothless and easily sussed out and wastes clear chances with profligate ease.

And we don't have a plan B either. What amounts to an alternate strategy - usually when we are up against it - is to switch to 4-3-3 and fuck the attack up completely.

Fulham were there to be beaten today. First half we showed some promise and they couldn't deal with Berge, but elsewhere we are so bloody predictable and when the opposition takes it's eye off the game and we get a ball into the zone, we can rely on our once-record signing to fucking head it wide or straight at the keeper. Is that what we bought him for?

We were always apt to be undone by the likes of Lookman, who looked like the type of player - like Cairney and Mitrovic we should have signed three seasons ago as record deals. He ran us ragged and deserved his goal. Mitrovic is now bereft of ability to execute and their penalty was as a result of Robinson's breathtaking naivety, why have your hands up so fucking high when challenging for a cross in your own fucking area? It's not as though this season - Dier and Maupay - there aren't any examples of 'seen 'em given'. It tells us all we need to know about how far the decline has set in. If Jay McEveley did this (and he did - oh, boy how he fucking did it, the clown) we'd laugh about it and be a bit mad, but it's just McEveley innit? But this is Jack's replacement, already displaced by Enda Stevens in CWAKs attempted rehabilitation of the LCB position in the absence of the Hat. And not only have we paid for O'Connell's absence and long term injury enough, he almost lost us the game were it not for Mitrovic's doppy spot kick.

So what to do? As said, we need to change the formation. I hear it when people say we can't play four at the back but maybe we'll have to learn to do so. For great periods of today's game I looked and we were our usually disciplined shape of 5-3-2, this against Fulham, newly promoted and struggling more than us. But it gives us nothing going forward. Maybe switching to 4-1-3-2 or 4-1-2-1-2 or 4-3-1-2 might give us more midfield options but again, only one player at the moment seems to be showing the ability to take us into the danger areas. We need Brooks as well, as a foil for Berge and also as a link between midfield and front. But that's not gonna happen, is it?

Out of ten

Ramsdale 7/10: Loses a point for the deseperate, dropped cross but gains it back for the follow-on bravery in blocking the shot after it. Still think he is more theatrical than effective in his attempts to save stuff. No, you're not Dean Henderson.
Baldock 7/10: Gets much the same mark every week from me as George is proving to be 'Mr Consistent'. Although he is an effective cog in the Baldock-Basham-Berge triad, he seems pinned back at times and twice today, threw it in only for the return pass to miss him and go out of play for the initiative to be lost
Basham 8/10: Still love this bloke. He is the one thing at the moment which makes watching United bearable and when Robinson is on the pitch and CWAK switches to 4-3-3, shouldn't be the sacrificial lamb to make way. He reads the game so well, picks people's pockets and moves the game up the pitch and does the essentials of defending so well. Was unfortunate to lose out to Lookman for the goal.
Egan 6.5/10: He dealt with a lacklustre Mitrovic well but when we went to 4 at the back just lost his bubble somewhat. Twice he simply let him get the better of him and get a fairly easy header in.
Robinson 4/10: Really don't think he is at PL level. His legendary throws today went mainly to the keeper and he looked as though he was struggling to deal with the magnitude of the game. The penalty was just idiotic, McEveley-level wankery.
Stevens 6/10: Not enough to assess on LCB, but at LWB it was a better performance, if not legendary Enda. Still think he's on the wane now and will be shipped out next season
Berge 7/10: First half he showed some alarmingly good composure and footballing nous and tended to just shove Fulham's defence aside. It was almost Currie like at times. Second half he was not quite so prolific, but at last is showing us what he can actually do. He needs a goal or two, but then again, we all fucking do.
Norwood 2/10: Pin 'em back. He isn't good enough. Fulham and Brighton were right and today was why. For a CM defensive pivot he is so easily dispossessed and brushed aside, outfought, outrun or simply bypassed. His legendary pings are now easily read and predictable and that fucking free kick, with Berge waiting for the roll through when he then deftly chipped it over everyone's heads to the defender at the back post tells you all you need to know. If you are following this write up with slavver countering this then please provide evidence of his effectiveness today. I saw him just bustled out of the way, the ball swept off his feet and him desperately chasing his fuck ups back into our half as Fulham pounced and punished. This isn't what anyone should expect of a PL player. His contemporaries - who he will face in the next few weeks like Kante, Hojberg, De Bruyne and Henderson - don't allow this to happen. He needs dropping and shipping out. He'll never make any impact on this league as long as his arsehole points downwards. We have suffered enough.
Lundstram 5/10: Another 'bitty' game for him and again, if he's still holding out on his deal, drop the fucker and give Osborn the job to develop. Second half I was struggling to see if he was playing at times
McGoldrick 5/10: Not really sure what Didsy did today which was effective or worthy of praise but in fairness, service to him was pisspoor. Again.
McBurnie 4/10: Three, maybe four clear chances out of which you'd expect him to bury two of them. Then, second half he's out of the box playing LW.

Lowe - Not on long enough.Shame for him on his PL debut
Sharp 6/10: Just for taking the penalty like Lundstram should have taken it against Villa
Brewster 5/10: Not really on or involved to make much of an assessment. Nice to see him - at last - in a Blades shirt but hope upon hope he doesn't turn into another Mousset

Wilder 4/10: A point is a point, but he needs to have a better team formation and be brave enough to drop and rearrange the midfield to make the game winnable.

Ref 7/10: Pretty good. Think our penalty was iffy however.

pommpey
 
Last edited:

I hear all your points mate.

My question is, who is in your side in a 4-4-2?

Big problems at the lane at present but a lot of it is confidence and momentum for me.
 
Norwood 2/10

B5xq7Im.gif
 
I hear all your points mate.

My question is, who is in your side in a 4-4-2?

Big problems at the lane at present but a lot of it is confidence and momentum for me.

For me, the route out of this is:

-----------------------------------Ramsdale--------------------------------------

Baldock----------------Ampadu------------------Egan---------------------Lowe

-------------------------------------Basham----------------------------------------

------------Berge----------------------------------------------Osborn-------------

-------------------------------------Brooks-----------------------------------------

--------------------Burke-------------------------------------Brewster------------

We need to sign/loan-in David Brooks. Now.

pommpey
 
Agree with most of that but the marks for Baldock and Basham are too generous. Bashams attempt at stopping Lookman was pathetic.

Think he was unlucky. He was tight to him, but the flip-through/bounce was unfortunate

pommpey
 
We've played two promoted sides now and in Leeds we encountered a side fully prepared - as we were last season - to throw caution to the wind and adapt and take the challenge on face first. They've also brought players in who are PL ready and can in fact mix it with the best. Fulham on the other hand are playing the cautious, Norwich style game of 'look at us how lucky we are to be in the big league' and their team and strategy says the same. They were the best way for us to salvage something out of what has been a pretty dismal start to our second term in the top flight and to me, three points today weren't simply a nice to have thing - it was essential. Okay,some teams are better placed to go down than us (on paper) but we are still getting it so wrong in many areas on the pitch and that reflects on the single, some-would-say undeserved point we salvaged today.

Quite simply, we are suffering from a type of 'long COVID'. Since the return from lockdown with some rare exceptions, we have been punchless, devoid of ideas and guile and looking the relegation fodder we always (secretly) thought we were. We are wheezy, slow and needing the oxygen of inspiration. It came in rare instances today, mainly at the deft, developing feet of Sander Berge who is slowly stamping his mark on a team who are now looking like they are beneath him.

The formation is dogeared and familiar and needs a revamp. Wilder (if not already) needs to be looking at something different because clearly we are being snuffed out, even by more basic teams like Fulham. If the last few games of last season and the first two minutes of this season didn't ring enough alarm bells then I don't know what will. I see many posters on here giving it the 'what's up wi thee?' when people point out the bleedin' obvious. What is obvious is that we will now be seriously in the struggle until next spring, and if nothing changes, relegated by Easter. It's as basic as that. We can't keep relying on the central three, already one Musketeer down (for a long time and how long until he's back at performance status?) to play the 'overlapping centre back' game whilst oppositions now press back and one of the three isn't set up to do this effectively. We can't rely on both wingbacks doing their touchline marauding whilst the areas are now full of defenders. Our midfield is pitifully weak, yet Wilder keeps picking the same setup, which has the same effect. And our attack is toothless and easily sussed out and wastes clear chances with profligate ease.

And we don't have a plan B either. What amounts to an alternate strategy - usually when we are up against it - is to switch to 4-3-3 and fuck the attack up completely.

Fulham were there to be beaten today. First half we showed some promise and they couldn't deal with Berge, but elsewhere we are so bloody predictable and when the opposition takes it's eye off the game and we get a ball into the zone, we can rely on our once-record signing to fucking head it wide or straight at the keeper. Is that what we bought him for?

We were always apt to be undone by the likes of Lookman, who looked like the type of player - like Cairney and Mitrovic we should have signed three seasons ago as record deals. He ran us ragged and deserved his goal. Mitrovic is now bereft of ability to execute and their penalty was as a result of Robinson's breathtaking naivety, why have your hands up so fucking high when challenging for a cross in your own fucking area? It's not as though this season - Dier and Maupay - there aren't any examples of 'seen 'em given'. It tells us all we need to know about how far the decline has set in. If Jay McEveley did this (and he did - oh, boy how he fucking did it, the clown) we'd laugh about it and be a bit mad, but it's just McEveley innit? But this is Jack's replacement, already displaced by Enda Stevens in CWAKs attempted rehabilitation of the LCB position in the absence of the Hat. And not only have we paid for O'Connell's absence and long term injury enough, he almost lost us the game were it not for Mitrovic's doppy spot kick.

So what to do? As said, we need to change the formation. I hear it when people say we can't play four at the back but maybe we'll have to learn to do so. For great periods of today's game I looked and we were our usually disciplined shape of 5-3-2, this against Fulham, newly promoted and struggling more than us. But it gives us nothing going forward. Maybe switching to 4-1-3-2 or 4-1-2-1-2 or 4-3-1-2 might give us more midfield options but again, only one player at the moment seems to be showing the ability to take us into the danger areas. We need Brooks as well, as a foil for Berge and also as a link between midfield and front. But that's not gonna happen, is it?

Out of ten

Ramsdale 7/10: Loses a point for the deseperate, dropped cross but gains it back for the follow-on bravery in blocking the shot after it. Still think he is more theatrical than effective in his attempts to save stuff. No, you're not Dean Henderson.
Baldock 7/10: Gets much the same mark every week from me as George is proving to be 'Mr Consistent'. Although he is an effective cog in the Baldock-Basham-Berge triad, he seems pinned back at times and twice today, threw it in only for the return pass to miss him and go out of play for the initiative to be lost
Basham 8/10: Still love this bloke. He is the one thing at the moment which makes watching United bearable and when Robinson is on the pitch and CWAK switches to 4-3-3, shouldn't be the sacrificial lamb to make way. He reads the game so well, picks people's pockets and moves the game up the pitch and does the essentials of defending so well. Was unfortunate to lose out to Lookman for the goal.
Egan 6.5/10: He dealt with a lacklustre Mitrovic well but when we went to 4 at the back just lost his bubble somewhat. Twice he simply let him get the better of him and get a fairly easy header in.
Robinson 4/10: Really don't think he is at PL level. His legendary throws today went mainly to the keeper and he looked as though he was struggling to deal with the magnitude of the game. The penalty was just idiotic, McEveley-level wankery.
Stevens 6/10: Not enough to assess on LCB, but at LWB it was a better performance, if not legendary Enda. Still think he's on the wane now and will be shipped out next season
Berge 7/10: First half he showed some alarmingly good composure and footballing nous and tended to just shove Fulham's defence aside. It was almost Currie like at times. Second half he was not quite so prolific, but at last is showing us what he can actually do. He needs a goal or two, but then again, we all fucking do.
Norwood 2/10: Pin 'em back. He isn't good enough. Fulham and Brighton were right and today was why. For a CM defensive pivot he is so easily dispossessed and brushed aside, outfought, outrun or simply bypassed. His legendary pings are now easily read and predictable and that fucking free kick, with Berge waiting for the roll through when he then deftly chipped it over everyone's heads to the defender at the back post tells you all you need to know. If you are following this write up with slavver countering this then please provide evidence of his effectiveness today. I saw him just bustled out of the way, the ball swept off his feet and him desperately chasing his fuck ups back into our half as Fulham pounced and punished. This isn't what anyone should expect of a PL player. His contemporaries - who he will face in the next few weeks like Kante, Hojberg, De Bruyne and Henderson - don't allow this to happen. He needs dropping and shipping out. He'll never make any impact on this league as long as his arsehole points downwards. We have suffered enough.
Lundstram 5/10: Another 'bitty' game for him and again, if he's still holding out on his deal, drop the fucker and give Osborn the job to develop. Second half I was struggling to see if he was playing at times
McGoldrick 5/10: Not really sure what Didsy did today which was effective or worthy of praise but in fairness, service to him was pisspoor. Again.
McBurnie 4/10: Three, maybe four clear chances out of which you'd expect him to bury two of them. Then, second half he's out of the box playing LW.

Lowe - Not on long enough.Shame for him on his PL debut
Sharp 6/10: Just for taking the penalty like Lundstram should have taken it against Villa
Brewster 5/10: Not really on or involved to make much of an assessment. Nice to see him - at last - in a Blades shirt but hope upon hope he doesn't turn into another Mousset

Wilder 4/10: A point is a point, but he needs to have a better team formation and be brave enough to drop and rearrange the midfield to make the game winnable.

Ref 7/10: Pretty good. Think our penalty was iffy however.

pommpey
Interesting write up and enjoy your report/ratings each weeks and gives me chance to compare to me and what others think.

Agree with you on Norwood 2nd half but we are analysing a whole game. First half 4 or 5 of our attacks came from his forward passes where he dissected players. He was very influential to begin the game and one of the better players on the field alluded to by BT. Not sure how he gets a 2/10 - obvious limitations 2nd half when Fulham ran through Berge and Lundstram exactly the same. They were as bad as him 2nd half in my opinion. If Norwood had done what Berge did on the goal I wonder what the reaction would be - it was pathetic.

As for him never making an impact on this league - well he did last season and played well for long spells so that is inaccurate. He does have definite limitations as players run off him but then why dont we use Ampadu on the hour - also the other midfielders were not exactly chasing back and covering either. He was poor 2nd half but so were nearly the whole team - not quite sure why he has been singled out as the weak link -there were probably 10 weak links. Interesting Wilder gave him a new contract though -ditto with Sharp/McGoldrick - think they were moves I think were a little hasty as not sure any of the 3 will be here in 12-18 months personally. However, Norwood did more in 45 mins than Fleck has done in the last 6 months of football.

I cannot agree with your Baldock, 'Mr consistent' comment. Think he has been totally ineffective this season as has Stevens. Teams have stopped them completely and the other way he struggled with Lookman - maybe Berge could have helped but he was at full stretch. Attacking wise he just runs to the line and then has no idea.

Lots of issues todays but it's more than just Norwood. First half we played the best we have this season with him at the hub and influentual. 3 of the other 4 games he has not played and Berge played there and still we have had no control of the midfield. Maybe neither are good enough defensively to play that role against quicker, runners and what I do agree with you is some tweaks to our formation definitely.

Agree with you on Robinson - he is not good enough and not Premier League in ability, pace or decision making - steady but making mistakes every games does not cut it.

I feel we have 7 or 8 key men woefully out of form or are they? Maybe they overperformed last year and actually the sum of their career (Fleck, Norwood, McGoldrick, Stevens, Baldock, Sharp, Lundstram) suggests that the evidence is they are Champ-League One players. That might draw the ire of fan and we love all of them but most of these have been around for a fair while and no Premier League teams ever saw them being capable at this level - maybe they did just all have the season of their lives last year and are Champ level players. People might get annoyed at that but at the moment unless they turn it around - the evidence could be heading that way. Hope not but by seasons end we will see.
 
For me, the route out of this is:

-----------------------------------Ramsdale--------------------------------------

Baldock----------------Ampadu------------------Egan---------------------Lowe

-------------------------------------Basham----------------------------------------

------------Berge----------------------------------------------Osborn-------------

-------------------------------------Brooks-----------------------------------------

--------------------Burke-------------------------------------Brewster------------

We need to sign/loan-in David Brooks. Now.

pommpey

We are not signing Brooks in a million years. It's a pipe dream. The window has shut anyway. He'll move to a top 10 side in January. We won't be anywhere near that.

However players like Buendia were/are available. We have no creative element at all.
 
We are not signing Brooks in a million years. It's a pipe dream. The window has shut anyway. He'll move to a top 10 side in January. We won't be anywhere near that.

However players like Buendia were/are available. We have no creative element at all.

He wanted back to BDTBL and it is the most complete resultant for his career.

If he wants to do a Michael Tonge, sign for a 'top PL outfit' and sit on the bench, then he's welcome. We need him in the ten role, where a few short seasons ago he was pretty fucking devastating.

JTW. GO!

pommpey
 
Yes ramsdale made a mistake and recovered kept us in the game .give the lad a break .he didnt have much in front of him second half .gets 9 /10 for me .hendersons gone .lets support our own now
 
I have soo many questions regarding our midfield and the lack of depth.
Freeman has to be a better option than playing Lunny on his off wing. Not saying Freeman would be our saviour, but he offers a little more class than Lunny and Osbourne.
Norwood and his lack of speed is killing us. Hoping Ampadu gets the nod over him next week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SWB
Whilst I agree with the sentiment of it all I am still of the mindset that we entered the PL well before our time so to speak. We then had an unbelievable season which gave people far too much expectation.
We are now where we probably should have been last season if we go down we go down. What I do know is the club has a great foundation to build that to me is more important than anything.
I still don’t think we will go down, we are having a very tough time of it and that second half was probably the worse we have played all season. We didn’t deserve to lose to Villa or Leeds and should have been out of site first half today.
We need to stick with it let’s be honest the empty stadiums is killing us probably more than any over team due to the way we play. I think a wounded Wilder will get us going and we now have two games where the pressure is off so to speak. There has been some crazy results recently and you never know.
Keep the faith Blades will will be fine and by that I mean even if we go down we will still be fine. As ever UTB
 

For me, the route out of this is:

-----------------------------------Ramsdale--------------------------------------

Baldock----------------Ampadu------------------Egan---------------------Lowe

-------------------------------------Basham----------------------------------------

------------Berge----------------------------------------------Osborn-------------

-------------------------------------Brooks-----------------------------------------

--------------------Burke-------------------------------------Brewster------------

We need to sign/loan-in David Brooks. Now.

pommpey

Interesting. Thats 4-3-3 for me. In that side, we have Basham in a role he almost never plays. 4 very inexperienced premier league players in Lowe, Brewster, Burke and Ampadu. Plus we wont get Brooks on loan. Who will play in the Brooks role? Would you play this against Liverpool away? If so, it's total desperation stakes.
 
I'd try something different too....

-------------------Rammers---------------------
Baldock----Bash----Egan----Stevens----Lowe
--------------------Ampadu--------------------
---------Lunsdtram--------Fleck (if fit)----------
--------------------Berge------------------------
-------------------Brewster----------------------

Nothing to lose at Liverpool apart from our goal difference.
 
We've played two promoted sides now and in Leeds we encountered a side fully prepared - as we were last season - to throw caution to the wind and adapt and take the challenge on face first. They've also brought players in who are PL ready and can in fact mix it with the best. Fulham on the other hand are playing the cautious, Norwich style game of 'look at us how lucky we are to be in the big league' and their team and strategy says the same. They were the best way for us to salvage something out of what has been a pretty dismal start to our second term in the top flight and to me, three points today weren't simply a nice to have thing - it was essential. Okay,some teams are better placed to go down than us (on paper) but we are still getting it so wrong in many areas on the pitch and that reflects on the single, some-would-say undeserved point we salvaged today.

Quite simply, we are suffering from a type of 'long COVID'. Since the return from lockdown with some rare exceptions, we have been punchless, devoid of ideas and guile and looking the relegation fodder we always (secretly) thought we were. We are wheezy, slow and needing the oxygen of inspiration. It came in rare instances today, mainly at the deft, developing feet of Sander Berge who is slowly stamping his mark on a team who are now looking like they are beneath him.

The formation is dogeared and familiar and needs a revamp. Wilder (if not already) needs to be looking at something different because clearly we are being snuffed out, even by more basic teams like Fulham. If the last few games of last season and the first two minutes of this season didn't ring enough alarm bells then I don't know what will. I see many posters on here giving it the 'what's up wi thee?' when people point out the bleedin' obvious. What is obvious is that we will now be seriously in the struggle until next spring, and if nothing changes, relegated by Easter. It's as basic as that. We can't keep relying on the central three, already one Musketeer down (for a long time and how long until he's back at performance status?) to play the 'overlapping centre back' game whilst oppositions now press back and one of the three isn't set up to do this effectively. We can't rely on both wingbacks doing their touchline marauding whilst the areas are now full of defenders. Our midfield is pitifully weak, yet Wilder keeps picking the same setup, which has the same effect. And our attack is toothless and easily sussed out and wastes clear chances with profligate ease.

And we don't have a plan B either. What amounts to an alternate strategy - usually when we are up against it - is to switch to 4-3-3 and fuck the attack up completely.

Fulham were there to be beaten today. First half we showed some promise and they couldn't deal with Berge, but elsewhere we are so bloody predictable and when the opposition takes it's eye off the game and we get a ball into the zone, we can rely on our once-record signing to fucking head it wide or straight at the keeper. Is that what we bought him for?

We were always apt to be undone by the likes of Lookman, who looked like the type of player - like Cairney and Mitrovic we should have signed three seasons ago as record deals. He ran us ragged and deserved his goal. Mitrovic is now bereft of ability to execute and their penalty was as a result of Robinson's breathtaking naivety, why have your hands up so fucking high when challenging for a cross in your own fucking area? It's not as though this season - Dier and Maupay - there aren't any examples of 'seen 'em given'. It tells us all we need to know about how far the decline has set in. If Jay McEveley did this (and he did - oh, boy how he fucking did it, the clown) we'd laugh about it and be a bit mad, but it's just McEveley innit? But this is Jack's replacement, already displaced by Enda Stevens in CWAKs attempted rehabilitation of the LCB position in the absence of the Hat. And not only have we paid for O'Connell's absence and long term injury enough, he almost lost us the game were it not for Mitrovic's doppy spot kick.

So what to do? As said, we need to change the formation. I hear it when people say we can't play four at the back but maybe we'll have to learn to do so. For great periods of today's game I looked and we were our usually disciplined shape of 5-3-2, this against Fulham, newly promoted and struggling more than us. But it gives us nothing going forward. Maybe switching to 4-1-3-2 or 4-1-2-1-2 or 4-3-1-2 might give us more midfield options but again, only one player at the moment seems to be showing the ability to take us into the danger areas. We need Brooks as well, as a foil for Berge and also as a link between midfield and front. But that's not gonna happen, is it?

Out of ten

Ramsdale 7/10: Loses a point for the deseperate, dropped cross but gains it back for the follow-on bravery in blocking the shot after it. Still think he is more theatrical than effective in his attempts to save stuff. No, you're not Dean Henderson.
Baldock 7/10: Gets much the same mark every week from me as George is proving to be 'Mr Consistent'. Although he is an effective cog in the Baldock-Basham-Berge triad, he seems pinned back at times and twice today, threw it in only for the return pass to miss him and go out of play for the initiative to be lost
Basham 8/10: Still love this bloke. He is the one thing at the moment which makes watching United bearable and when Robinson is on the pitch and CWAK switches to 4-3-3, shouldn't be the sacrificial lamb to make way. He reads the game so well, picks people's pockets and moves the game up the pitch and does the essentials of defending so well. Was unfortunate to lose out to Lookman for the goal.
Egan 6.5/10: He dealt with a lacklustre Mitrovic well but when we went to 4 at the back just lost his bubble somewhat. Twice he simply let him get the better of him and get a fairly easy header in.
Robinson 4/10: Really don't think he is at PL level. His legendary throws today went mainly to the keeper and he looked as though he was struggling to deal with the magnitude of the game. The penalty was just idiotic, McEveley-level wankery.
Stevens 6/10: Not enough to assess on LCB, but at LWB it was a better performance, if not legendary Enda. Still think he's on the wane now and will be shipped out next season
Berge 7/10: First half he showed some alarmingly good composure and footballing nous and tended to just shove Fulham's defence aside. It was almost Currie like at times. Second half he was not quite so prolific, but at last is showing us what he can actually do. He needs a goal or two, but then again, we all fucking do.
Norwood 2/10: Pin 'em back. He isn't good enough. Fulham and Brighton were right and today was why. For a CM defensive pivot he is so easily dispossessed and brushed aside, outfought, outrun or simply bypassed. His legendary pings are now easily read and predictable and that fucking free kick, with Berge waiting for the roll through when he then deftly chipped it over everyone's heads to the defender at the back post tells you all you need to know. If you are following this write up with slavver countering this then please provide evidence of his effectiveness today. I saw him just bustled out of the way, the ball swept off his feet and him desperately chasing his fuck ups back into our half as Fulham pounced and punished. This isn't what anyone should expect of a PL player. His contemporaries - who he will face in the next few weeks like Kante, Hojberg, De Bruyne and Henderson - don't allow this to happen. He needs dropping and shipping out. He'll never make any impact on this league as long as his arsehole points downwards. We have suffered enough.
Lundstram 5/10: Another 'bitty' game for him and again, if he's still holding out on his deal, drop the fucker and give Osborn the job to develop. Second half I was struggling to see if he was playing at times
McGoldrick 5/10: Not really sure what Didsy did today which was effective or worthy of praise but in fairness, service to him was pisspoor. Again.
McBurnie 4/10: Three, maybe four clear chances out of which you'd expect him to bury two of them. Then, second half he's out of the box playing LW.

Lowe - Not on long enough.Shame for him on his PL debut
Sharp 6/10: Just for taking the penalty like Lundstram should have taken it against Villa
Brewster 5/10: Not really on or involved to make much of an assessment. Nice to see him - at last - in a Blades shirt but hope upon hope he doesn't turn into another Mousset

Wilder 4/10: A point is a point, but he needs to have a better team formation and be brave enough to drop and rearrange the midfield to make the game winnable.

Ref 7/10: Pretty good. Think our penalty was iffy however.

pommpey
Some fair points. However, disagree with comments on Norwood. He was instrumental to our attacking play last year and played some great incisive balls in first half. Agree he struggled in 2nd half but he wasn't the only one.
 
Interesting write up and enjoy your report/ratings each weeks and gives me chance to compare to me and what others think.

Agree with you on Norwood 2nd half but we are analysing a whole game. First half 4 or 5 of our attacks came from his forward passes where he dissected players. He was very influential to begin the game and one of the better players on the field alluded to by BT. Not sure how he gets a 2/10 - obvious limitations 2nd half when Fulham ran through Berge and Lundstram exactly the same. They were as bad as him 2nd half in my opinion. If Norwood had done what Berge did on the goal I wonder what the reaction would be - it was pathetic.

As for him never making an impact on this league - well he did last season and played well for long spells so that is inaccurate. He does have definite limitations as players run off him but then why dont we use Ampadu on the hour - also the other midfielders were not exactly chasing back and covering either. He was poor 2nd half but so were nearly the whole team - not quite sure why he has been singled out as the weak link -there were probably 10 weak links. Interesting Wilder gave him a new contract though -ditto with Sharp/McGoldrick - think they were moves I think were a little hasty as not sure any of the 3 will be here in 12-18 months personally. However, Norwood did more in 45 mins than Fleck has done in the last 6 months of football.

I cannot agree with your Baldock, 'Mr consistent' comment. Think he has been totally ineffective this season as has Stevens. Teams have stopped them completely and the other way he struggled with Lookman - maybe Berge could have helped but he was at full stretch. Attacking wise he just runs to the line and then has no idea.

Lots of issues todays but it's more than just Norwood. First half we played the best we have this season with him at the hub and influentual. 3 of the other 4 games he has not played and Berge played there and still we have had no control of the midfield. Maybe neither are good enough defensively to play that role against quicker, runners and what I do agree with you is some tweaks to our formation definitely.

Agree with you on Robinson - he is not good enough and not Premier League in ability, pace or decision making - steady but making mistakes every games does not cut it.

I feel we have 7 or 8 key men woefully out of form or are they? Maybe they overperformed last year and actually the sum of their career (Fleck, Norwood, McGoldrick, Stevens, Baldock, Sharp, Lundstram) suggests that the evidence is they are Champ-League One players. That might draw the ire of fan and we love all of them but most of these have been around for a fair while and no Premier League teams ever saw them being capable at this level - maybe they did just all have the season of their lives last year and are Champ level players. People might get annoyed at that but at the moment unless they turn it around - the evidence could be heading that way. Hope not but by seasons end we will see.

I got panned for my different takes on Berge v Leeds (I gave him 6 and most had him a 7 or even 8)

stringer (Danny Hall) certainly had a different opinion to you pommpey on Norwood. He gave him our highest mark of all the outfield players in the Star!

Oliver Norwood - 8​

Back in the side after a few games on the sidelines, although without the captain's armband, and showed United what they've been missing early on. Many key passes, including one to Berge for 'goal' which was ruled out

Game of opinions indeed!
 
enjoyed your write up, saw it the same as me (I watched with no commentary due to a hooky stream so no pundits words put in my mouth). Think 2’s a bit harsh on Norwood. Whilst we were on top I thought he was a big part of knitting our possession together, but agree he disappeared second half, and has a habit of losing his man at bad moments.

Reckon if one of those chances goes in first half we’re talking about having cruised through a game with a fag on, hopefully this will come with time..
 
My take was that McBurnie closes his eyes when heading a ball.

Norwood's ping needs a new shaft.

Baldock & Stevens are on thin ice.

We lack invention or a plan B.

We are very slow this season, what happened to the well oiled machine that pressed hard all over the pitch for 90 minutes.
 
So thorough - but I’m afraid your homework gets 3/10. Norwood during the first half was the heartbeat, he was the main reason everyone agrees it was Blades 1st half. Yes he got overrun in the second half but the whole team tired.

Norwood 7 -

Berge 8 and MOM.

Please try not to be so blinkered in’ your say’ you don’t like Norwood we get it, but if you critique at least be fair.
 
I'd try something different too....

-------------------Rammers---------------------
Baldock----Bash----Egan----Stevens----Lowe
--------------------Ampadu--------------------
---------Lunsdtram--------Fleck (if fit)----------
--------------------Berge------------------------
-------------------Brewster----------------------

Nothing to lose at Liverpool apart from our goal difference.
Fleck won't be fit. How about Burke behind Brewster, giving us a couple of ball carriers from deep and a finisher up front. Bit like Villa's recipe against them.
 
Fleck won't be fit. How about Burke behind Brewster, giving us a couple of ball carriers from deep and a finisher up front. Bit like Villa's recipe against them.

Maybe

How long is Fleck out for? Not seen any reports to see time he is out
 
We've played two promoted sides now and in Leeds we encountered a side fully prepared - as we were last season - to throw caution to the wind and adapt and take the challenge on face first. They've also brought players in who are PL ready and can in fact mix it with the best. Fulham on the other hand are playing the cautious, Norwich style game of 'look at us how lucky we are to be in the big league' and their team and strategy says the same. They were the best way for us to salvage something out of what has been a pretty dismal start to our second term in the top flight and to me, three points today weren't simply a nice to have thing - it was essential. Okay,some teams are better placed to go down than us (on paper) but we are still getting it so wrong in many areas on the pitch and that reflects on the single, some-would-say undeserved point we salvaged today.

Quite simply, we are suffering from a type of 'long COVID'. Since the return from lockdown with some rare exceptions, we have been punchless, devoid of ideas and guile and looking the relegation fodder we always (secretly) thought we were. We are wheezy, slow and needing the oxygen of inspiration. It came in rare instances today, mainly at the deft, developing feet of Sander Berge who is slowly stamping his mark on a team who are now looking like they are beneath him.

The formation is dogeared and familiar and needs a revamp. Wilder (if not already) needs to be looking at something different because clearly we are being snuffed out, even by more basic teams like Fulham. If the last few games of last season and the first two minutes of this season didn't ring enough alarm bells then I don't know what will. I see many posters on here giving it the 'what's up wi thee?' when people point out the bleedin' obvious. What is obvious is that we will now be seriously in the struggle until next spring, and if nothing changes, relegated by Easter. It's as basic as that. We can't keep relying on the central three, already one Musketeer down (for a long time and how long until he's back at performance status?) to play the 'overlapping centre back' game whilst oppositions now press back and one of the three isn't set up to do this effectively. We can't rely on both wingbacks doing their touchline marauding whilst the areas are now full of defenders. Our midfield is pitifully weak, yet Wilder keeps picking the same setup, which has the same effect. And our attack is toothless and easily sussed out and wastes clear chances with profligate ease.

And we don't have a plan B either. What amounts to an alternate strategy - usually when we are up against it - is to switch to 4-3-3 and fuck the attack up completely.

Fulham were there to be beaten today. First half we showed some promise and they couldn't deal with Berge, but elsewhere we are so bloody predictable and when the opposition takes it's eye off the game and we get a ball into the zone, we can rely on our once-record signing to fucking head it wide or straight at the keeper. Is that what we bought him for?

We were always apt to be undone by the likes of Lookman, who looked like the type of player - like Cairney and Mitrovic we should have signed three seasons ago as record deals. He ran us ragged and deserved his goal. Mitrovic is now bereft of ability to execute and their penalty was as a result of Robinson's breathtaking naivety, why have your hands up so fucking high when challenging for a cross in your own fucking area? It's not as though this season - Dier and Maupay - there aren't any examples of 'seen 'em given'. It tells us all we need to know about how far the decline has set in. If Jay McEveley did this (and he did - oh, boy how he fucking did it, the clown) we'd laugh about it and be a bit mad, but it's just McEveley innit? But this is Jack's replacement, already displaced by Enda Stevens in CWAKs attempted rehabilitation of the LCB position in the absence of the Hat. And not only have we paid for O'Connell's absence and long term injury enough, he almost lost us the game were it not for Mitrovic's doppy spot kick.

So what to do? As said, we need to change the formation. I hear it when people say we can't play four at the back but maybe we'll have to learn to do so. For great periods of today's game I looked and we were our usually disciplined shape of 5-3-2, this against Fulham, newly promoted and struggling more than us. But it gives us nothing going forward. Maybe switching to 4-1-3-2 or 4-1-2-1-2 or 4-3-1-2 might give us more midfield options but again, only one player at the moment seems to be showing the ability to take us into the danger areas. We need Brooks as well, as a foil for Berge and also as a link between midfield and front. But that's not gonna happen, is it?

Out of ten

Ramsdale 7/10: Loses a point for the deseperate, dropped cross but gains it back for the follow-on bravery in blocking the shot after it. Still think he is more theatrical than effective in his attempts to save stuff. No, you're not Dean Henderson.
Baldock 7/10: Gets much the same mark every week from me as George is proving to be 'Mr Consistent'. Although he is an effective cog in the Baldock-Basham-Berge triad, he seems pinned back at times and twice today, threw it in only for the return pass to miss him and go out of play for the initiative to be lost
Basham 8/10: Still love this bloke. He is the one thing at the moment which makes watching United bearable and when Robinson is on the pitch and CWAK switches to 4-3-3, shouldn't be the sacrificial lamb to make way. He reads the game so well, picks people's pockets and moves the game up the pitch and does the essentials of defending so well. Was unfortunate to lose out to Lookman for the goal.
Egan 6.5/10: He dealt with a lacklustre Mitrovic well but when we went to 4 at the back just lost his bubble somewhat. Twice he simply let him get the better of him and get a fairly easy header in.
Robinson 4/10: Really don't think he is at PL level. His legendary throws today went mainly to the keeper and he looked as though he was struggling to deal with the magnitude of the game. The penalty was just idiotic, McEveley-level wankery.
Stevens 6/10: Not enough to assess on LCB, but at LWB it was a better performance, if not legendary Enda. Still think he's on the wane now and will be shipped out next season
Berge 7/10: First half he showed some alarmingly good composure and footballing nous and tended to just shove Fulham's defence aside. It was almost Currie like at times. Second half he was not quite so prolific, but at last is showing us what he can actually do. He needs a goal or two, but then again, we all fucking do.
Norwood 2/10: Pin 'em back. He isn't good enough. Fulham and Brighton were right and today was why. For a CM defensive pivot he is so easily dispossessed and brushed aside, outfought, outrun or simply bypassed. His legendary pings are now easily read and predictable and that fucking free kick, with Berge waiting for the roll through when he then deftly chipped it over everyone's heads to the defender at the back post tells you all you need to know. If you are following this write up with slavver countering this then please provide evidence of his effectiveness today. I saw him just bustled out of the way, the ball swept off his feet and him desperately chasing his fuck ups back into our half as Fulham pounced and punished. This isn't what anyone should expect of a PL player. His contemporaries - who he will face in the next few weeks like Kante, Hojberg, De Bruyne and Henderson - don't allow this to happen. He needs dropping and shipping out. He'll never make any impact on this league as long as his arsehole points downwards. We have suffered enough.
Lundstram 5/10: Another 'bitty' game for him and again, if he's still holding out on his deal, drop the fucker and give Osborn the job to develop. Second half I was struggling to see if he was playing at times
McGoldrick 5/10: Not really sure what Didsy did today which was effective or worthy of praise but in fairness, service to him was pisspoor. Again.
McBurnie 4/10: Three, maybe four clear chances out of which you'd expect him to bury two of them. Then, second half he's out of the box playing LW.

Lowe - Not on long enough.Shame for him on his PL debut
Sharp 6/10: Just for taking the penalty like Lundstram should have taken it against Villa
Brewster 5/10: Not really on or involved to make much of an assessment. Nice to see him - at last - in a Blades shirt but hope upon hope he doesn't turn into another Mousset

Wilder 4/10: A point is a point, but he needs to have a better team formation and be brave enough to drop and rearrange the midfield to make the game winnable.

Ref 7/10: Pretty good. Think our penalty was iffy however.

pommpey
I’d give wilder 1 out of 10 just for not starting Brewster. Baffling decision!
 
Norwood back to #1 scapegoat then.
Because we looked so much better with Berge in the centre. Oh, wait...

He's not a scapegoat. He played poorly (in my opinion) and on this and last season's performances (in particular since the re-start after lockdown) he has been dismal. I feel people are incredibly rose-tinted about him because of the 'ping' (which seems to be noting more than a clang now) He is far too lightweight both physically and technically to carry the adoration some have for him. Today saw him chasing his own arse back into our half after either being dispossessed or in one case, attempting to hit a cross which rebounded off the arse of an opponent and immediately they pounced and were on the attack. You can't afford to be given the glory of the pivot when you are basically being passed around or dispossessed. When Lemina came on he just sauntered past him a few times. Norwood's job is to put a tackle in and stop that shit getting near our (as it was) back four. His role at the moment is as it's always been - receive the ball from the back three, look up and either smack it across the pitch or pass it back. He did the former in the second half to Stevens and it found their player. That free kick too, such a nailed on threat, and it's basically chipped to their player to clear. Berge stood unmarked on the edge of the 18 with a fucking 'PASS IT TO ME, PLEASE!' sign on his head.

So please don't try to put this on me making him a scapegoat. It's him out there underperforming. If you think he did anything worthy, let's hear it. At lease Deadbat did that.

In my opinion, the more Wilder plays him, the less we'll achieve.



pommpey
 
I agree with you on Norwood.

His first half passing wasn't enough to compensate for his complete ineptitude to shut down counter attacks or defend properly. He looks like he's underweight and needs a few sessions with a personal trainer, he looks abit ill.

Nowhere near what we need. I agreed with Wilder to start him because we have been lacking in that position in previous games but this game has highlighted to me how much Ampadu needs to go in now and step up.
 

So thorough - but I’m afraid your homework gets 3/10. Norwood during the first half was the heartbeat, he was the main reason everyone agrees it was Blades 1st half. Yes he got overrun in the second half but the whole team tired.

Norwood 7 -

Berge 8 and MOM.

Please try not to be so blinkered in’ your say’ you don’t like Norwood we get it, but if you critique at least be fair.

Um, not everyone agrees it was all United, first half.

pommpey
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom