Morecambe player report

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Bergen Blade

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
7,381
Reaction score
19,462
Location
Bergen, Norway
Think it was a decent game, certainly much better than I thought having listened to the radio.

Our formation was 4-4-1-1 with McNulty playing deeper than the main striker who was Sammon:

Howard
Freeman Edgar McEveley K.Wallace
Scougall Basham J.Wallace Woolford
McNulty
Sammon

Howard 5 - Not very convincing. Flapped at some crosses, lost an easy loose ball, was slow to get down when their free kick hit the post. His body language, the fact that he looks a bit more commanding than Long will probably make him a first choice on Saturday.

Freeman 9 - Excellent offensively and defensively. Constantly on the run forward, trying to contribute and help us create chances. Skilful and neat, combining well with Scougall, Wallace and McNulty in particular. I've seen people criticise his final ball. Don't agree with that, but often the problem was that Morecambe had so many players back that it was hard to find someone free in the box. There was one massively overhit cross at the end, and my suspicion is that a lot of people thought "he's been down that side a lot, but we haven't scored, i.e. his balls in haven't been good enough. Defensively he was also covering behind the centre halves a few times, although he was probably lucky to escape a sending off in the first half when his risky last ditch tackle saw him get very little of the ball.

Edgar 7 - Solid debut where he won every header. Also looked suprisingly good on the ball for a centre half. There was especially one touch and direct pass to Wallace that was superb. Some good passes apart from that too. There was one occasion on a defensive corner where he was blocked, therefore losing his man, and then desperately pulling him down. Think that would have been a penalty if the referee had seen it. Just before half time his man (Edwards) was allowed a free shot as well, not sure why Edgar lost him there.

McEveley 7 - Lost two headers first half and there was the odd pass that didn't find a team mate, but generally solid, calm and composed game. A few important blocks and challenges.

K.Wallace 6 - Doesn't look outstanding and I don't think he's a long term answer. I think he lacks pace and will struggle with quick and tricky wide men. He was in control most of the time vs Morecambe though and as he's a six footer he does make us a little bit stronger aerially.


Scougall 8 - Excellent and every bit as positive as in his first season. Took some time to get going, but eventually made himself available, found space, ran on the ball and tried penetrative passes. Linked well with teammates and Morecambe struggled to get near him, let alone stop him. Should gain confidence from this match as he looked to really enjoy it.

Basham 6,5 - Often looks a bit awkward and he is limited as a holding playmaker. Morecambe soon realised that it was his partner that was more important to close down, and thus Basham was often given a bit more time on the ball. As he's often a bit unsure of what to do, this slows our tempo down. Gave it away dangerously once or twice, but also won a lot of headers and got some challenges in. Agree with those saying he looks a bit lost in a central midfield duo though. Last season he was a ball winner/box to box man, so it's going to take a bit of getting used to for him to do this new role. I'd let him continue with Wallace for now though.

J.Wallace 8 - Excellent on the ball many times, lots of creative passes and through balls. Delighted to see him back and do so well. Was well closed down at the start of the game, but gradually started having more impact. Can get rid of a marker, run on the ball and spot runs into the box. Good corners too. At times (especially first half) he and Basham struggled to cover enough space behind them and that could be a problem in a 4-4-2. Clough would have gone mad if he'd seen the amount of times Morecambe found space between our defence and midfield. Disappeared later on and looked tired before he went off. Wallace must be a starter though, let's hope he stays fit.

Woolford 5 - Sadly I still haven't seen him play well, and it's time to let him start on the bench and see if he can come in and have a greater impact from there. Lacks pace for a wide man and doesn't seem exceptionally skilful. I think Adkins would like to see him chip in with goals, but he didn't threaten nor set anything of note up in this game.


McNulty 7 - Played behind Sammon and looked good when he got on the ball. His touch was good and he linked play a lot better than what he did last season. I think his fitness is improving after some reports of him looking heavier than before in the summer. He fluffed two good chances of scoring though. A third attempt looked a sure goal, but was blocked by a defender throwing himself at it.

Sammon 5,5 - You could see why he doesn't score many goals. Finished poorly when he got the chance. A second half back post header from a cross was his best effort. Worked pretty hard and is a good athlete and played a couple of decent passes. A better team player than goal getter.

--------------
Adams 6 - Came on at half time for Woolford and played on the left. More involved than MW, but not as impressive as in pre season. Their right back was a competitive, stocky guy, who didn't look easy to get past. Couldn't really make use of his pace, but had a couple of shots and won the corner that we scored from.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

As I said I think it was a decent game with some great performances and some mediocre. In the second half there looked to be a gulf in class and at times we almost got too much time and space on the ball - until we got the ball in the box! Morecambe dropped very deep at times and defended well in their box. If one of our earlier efforts had gone in I think we would have scored more.

Higher tempo may have helped break them down, but it's not easy to just switch that on. It could be necessary with a better playmaker than Basham (but then we'd possibly be overrun). No doubt Harris/Murphy would strengthen our left hand side, which wasn't great vs Morecambe. We must also look at which forwards will be our strongest and make sure we maintain enough pace in the side as we try to fix other things. In any case I think it was a definite step in the right direction.


Morecambe notes


  • Basham limited as a defensive playmaker
  • 4.25 Great Freeman run, almost sitter for McNulty - airshot
  • McNulty deeper than Sammon, 4-4-1-1?
  • Edgar looking comfortable on ball, good touch for a ch
  • Team looking a bit bigger and stronger. 6-7 six footers
  • Looking to Scougall to link play
  • Freeman good start
  • Our centre midfielders very well closed down, hard for us to use them
  • 15 mins M clean through, but Freeman gets a tackle in
  • Then good run and shot from McNulty
  • James Wallace corner looking good
  • Nice play Freeman-Wallace-Scougall, but poor cross from latter
  • McEveley takes out linesman
  • 20 mins Basham and Wallace struggling to cover enough space.
  • 20:30 typical Basham mistake
  • Good ball from McNulty to Sammon, but challenged - corner kick
  • Howard loses simple ball
  • Edgar is blocked at def corner, then probably fouls, but ref don't see it
  • Good ball from Wallace to McNulty, poor shot
  • Some decent, creative passes from Wallace
  • 25' M free kick hits post. Howard slow
  • 27 Superb ball from Wallace, Freeman's cross stopped
  • 28' Another dangerous corner from Wallace, flicked on at first post
  • 29 Great ball from Wallace to McNulty who sends Sammon clear. Poor finish wide
  • Edgar winning every header
  • 32' Freeman covering very well again
  • Once more good play from Wallace, getting forward
  • Freeman brilliant 1-2 with McNulty (superb chip). Volleyed shot wide
  • Well done Scougs, K. Wallace, McNulty
  • Superb defensive challenge from Freeman again
  • 41 Decent attack, but midfield then fail to get back to stop break, leading to dangerous M shot
  • Howard flaps at cross, dangerous, but shot blocked
  • 45 Edgar loses his man at corner, free shot


2nd half


  • Superb start by Scougall, run and sending Adams clear
  • Wallace-McNulty - good cross, Sammon header saved/blocked
  • 3' Scougs can't connect well enough on through ball
  • Good start
  • Wallace very close to sending Sammon clear again, looking excellent
  • Edgar free header from Scougall's corner, but poor connection
  • Great link play from Freeman, Scougs, Wallace.
  • 9' Unlucky Freeman cross
  • Blades dominating, good spell
  • Scougs looking good, bright, eager to find space, run on the ball and make penetrative passes. Not always got the accuracy
  • Sammon shot wide after Scougs winning back possession
  • Great possession play and good cross from Freeman
  • 19 McEv taking one for the team, booking after we lost balance
  • Scoug's task to block free kicks
  • Freeman cross, McNulty first time shot, far over. McNulty doing well though, finding space, distributing well.
  • 24 Blades finding a lot of space, looking far superior
  • 26 Freeman cross massively overhit (bumpy pitch??)
  • Another Sammon effort, doesn't look like a great finisher
  • McEve turned (clever, well done by M player)
  • Good effort at through ball from Sammon
  • Bash winning most headers in midfield
  • Wallace quieter as the match went on
  • Adams shot saved
  • Another McNulty shot blocked, looked a sure goal
  • Freeman alone against two M players, manages to stop the pass
  • 44 not great free kick from Adams
  • Adams wins the corner we scored from
  • Lot of game play, but Morecambe always good at having enough man back to block/prevent free shots
 
Last edited:



Thank you Bergen. Much appreciated.

Those are alarmingly low marks for our two new signings.
 
I wouldn't agree with you on Freeman, a 9 would imply that he was almost perfect and although he had a good game I maybe wouldn't go as far as that. Excellent work though, how long do these take you?:eek::D
 
Think it was a decent game, certainly much better than I thought having listened to the radio.

Our formation was 4-4-1-1 with McNulty playing deeper than the main striker who was Sammon:

Howard
Freeman Edgar McEveley K.Wallace
Scougall Basham J.Wallace Woolford
McNulty
Sammon

Howard 5 - Not very convincing. Flapped at some crosses, lost an easy loose ball, was slow to get down when their free kick hit the post. His body language, the fact that he looks a bit more commanding than Long will probably make him a first choice on Saturday.

Freeman 9 - Excellent offensively and defensively. Constantly on the run forward, trying to contribute and help us create chances. Skilful and neat, combining well with Scougall, Wallace and McNulty in particular. I've seen people criticise his final ball. Don't agree with that, but often the problem was that Morecambe had so many players back that it was hard to find someone free in the box. There was one massively overhit cross at the end, and my suspicion is that a lot of people thought "he's been down that side a lot, but we haven't scored, i.e. his balls in haven't been good enough. Defensively he was also covering behind the centre halves a few times, although he was probably lucky to escape a sending off in the first half when his risky last ditch tackle saw him get very little of the ball.

Edgar 7 - Solid debut where he won every header. Also looked suprisingly good on the ball for a centre half. There was especially one touch and direct pass to Wallace that was superb. Some good passes apart from that too. There was one occasion on a defensive corner where he was blocked, therefore losing his man, and then desperately pulling him down. Think that would have been a penalty if the referee had seen it. Just before half time his man (Edwards) was allowed a free shot as well, not sure why Edgar lost him there.

McEveley 7 - Lost two headers first half and there was the odd pass that didn't find a team mate, but generally solid, calm and composed game. A few important blocks and challenges.

K.Wallace 6 - Doesn't look outstanding and I don't think he's a long term answer. I think he lacks pace and will struggle with quick and tricky wide men. He was in control most of the time vs Morecambe though and as he's a six footer he does make us a little bit stronger aerially.


Scougall 8 - Excellent and every bit as positive as in his first season. Took some time to get going, but eventually made himself available, found space, ran on the ball and tried penetrative passes. Linked well with teammates and Morecambe struggled to get near him, let alone stop him. Should gain confidence from this match as he looked to really enjoy it.

Basham 6,5 - Often looks a bit awkward and he is limited as a holding playmaker. Morecambe soon realised that it was his partner that was more important to close down, and thus Basham was often given a bit more time on the ball. As he's often a bit unsure of what to do, this slows our tempo down. Gave it away dangerously once or twice, but also won a lot of headers and got some challenges in. Agree with those saying he looks a bit lost in a central midfield duo though. Last season he was a ball winner/box to box man, so it's going to take a bit of getting used to for him to do this new role. I'd let him continue with Wallace for now though.

J.Wallace 8 - Excellent on the ball many times, lots of creative passes and through balls. Delighted to see him back and do so well. Was well closed down at the start of the game, but gradually started having more impact. Can get rid of a marker, run on the ball and spot runs into the box. Good corners too. At times (especially first half) he and Basham struggled to cover enough space behind them and that could be a problem in a 4-4-2. Clough would have gone mad if he'd seen the amount of times Morecambe found space between our defence and midfield. Disappeared later on and looked tired before he went off. Wallace must be a starter though, let's hope he stays fit.

Woolford 5 - Sadly I still haven't seen him play well, and it's time to let him start on the bench and see if he can come in and have a greater impact from there. Lacks pace for a wide man and doesn't seem exceptionally skilful. I think Adkins would like to see him chip in with goals, but he didn't threaten nor set anything of note up in this game.


McNulty 7 - Played behind Sammon and looked good when he got on the ball. His touch was good and he linked play a lot better than what he did last season. I think his fitness is improving after some reports of him looking heavier than before in the summer. He fluffed two good chances of scoring though. A third attempt looked a sure goal, but was blocked by a defender throwing himself at it.

Sammon 5,5 - You could see why he doesn't score many goals. Finished poorly when he got the chance. A second half back post header from a cross was his best effort. Worked pretty hard and is a good athlete and played a couple of decent passes. A better team player than goal getter.

--------------
Adams 6 - Came on at half time for Woolford and played on the left. More involved than MW, but not as impressive as in pre season. Their right back was a competitive, stocky guy, who didn't look easy to get past. Couldn't really make use of his pace, but had a couple of shots and won the corner that we scored from.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

As I said I think it was a decent game with some great performances and some mediocre. In the second half there looked to be a gulf in class and at times we almost got too much time and space on the ball - until we got the ball in the box! Morecambe dropped very deep at times and defended well in their box. If one of our earlier efforts had gone in I think we would have scored more.

Higher tempo may have helped break them down, but it's not easy to just switch that on. It could be necessary with a better playmaker than Basham (but then we'd possibly be overrun). No doubt Harris/Murphy would strengthen our left hand side, which wasn't great vs Morecambe. We must also look at which forwards will be our strongest and make sure we maintain enough pace in the side as we try to fix other things. In any case I think it was a definite step in the right direction.


Morecambe notes


  • Basham limited as a defensive playmaker
  • 4.25 Great Freeman run, almost sitter for McNulty - airshot
  • McNulty deeper than Sammon, 4-4-1-1?
  • Edgar looking comfortable on ball, good touch for a ch
  • Team looking a bit bigger and stronger. 6-7 six footers
  • Looking to Scougall to link play
  • Freeman good start
  • Our centre midfielders very well closed down, hard for us to use them
  • 15 mins M clean through, but Freeman gets a tackle in
  • Then good run and shot from McNulty
  • James Wallace corner looking good
  • Nice play Freeman-Wallace-Scougall, but poor cross from latter
  • McEveley takes out linesman
  • 20 mins Basham and Wallace struggling to cover enough space.
  • 20:30 typical Basham mistake
  • Good ball from McNulty to Sammon, but challenged - corner kick
  • Howard loses simple ball
  • Edgar is blocked at def corner, then probably fouls, but ref don't see it
  • Good ball from Wallace to McNulty, poor shot
  • Some decent, creative passes from Wallace
  • 25' M free kick hits post. Howard slow
  • 27 Superb ball from Wallace, Freeman's cross stopped
  • 28' Another dangerous corner from Wallace, flicked on at first post
  • 29 Great ball from Wallace to McNulty who sends Sammon clear. Poor finish wide
  • Edgar winning every header
  • 32' Freeman covering very well again
  • Once more good play from Wallace, getting forward
  • Freeman brilliant 1-2 with McNulty (superb chip). Volleyed shot wide
  • Well done Scougs, K. Wallace, McNulty
  • Superb defensive challenge from Freeman again
  • 41 Decent attack, but midfield then fail to get back to stop break, leading to dangerous M shot
  • Howard flaps at cross, dangerous, but shot blocked
  • 45 Edgar loses his man at corner, free shot


2nd half


  • Superb start by Scougall, run and sending Adams clear
  • Wallace-McNulty - good cross, Sammon header saved/blocked
  • 3' Scougs can't connect well enough on through ball
  • Good start
  • Wallace very close to sending Sammon clear again, looking excellent
  • Edgar free header from Scougall's corner, but poor connection
  • Great link play from Freeman, Scougs, Wallace.
  • 9' Unlucky Freeman cross
  • Blades dominating, good spell
  • Scougs looking good, bright, eager to find space, run on the ball and make penetrative passes. Not always got the accuracy
  • Sammon shot wide after Scougs winning back possession
  • Great possession play and good cross from Freeman
  • 19 McEv taking one for the team, booking after we lost balance
  • Scoug's task to block free kicks
  • Freeman cross, McNulty first time shot, far over. McNulty doing well though, finding space, distributing well.
  • 24 Blades finding a lot of space, looking far superior
  • 26 Freeman cross massively overhit (bumpy pitch??)
  • Another Sammon effort, doesn't look like a great finisher
  • McEve turned (clever, well done by M player)
  • Good effort at through ball from Sammon
  • Bash winning most headers in midfield
  • Wallace quieter as the match went on
  • Adams shot saved
  • Another McNulty shot blocked, looked a sure goal
  • Freeman alone against two M players, manages to stop the pass
  • 44 not great free kick from Adams
  • Adams wins the corner we scored from
  • Lot of game play, but Morecambe always good at having enough man back to block/prevent free shots


Good summary.

I was at the game and sat near K.Wallace second half and he impressed me throughout the second half; didn't realise he was 6' though. that's good.

J.Wallace off the ball looked absolutely knackered after 20 minutes and generally went through the defensive motions.

Agree Scougall and McNulty showed their quality at times.

Your big point for me is about 4-4-2 and the Wallace/ Basham partnership. I agree Basham is lacking in confidence or indeed where-withall to contribute going forward and has little positional sense defensively, though I agree he played with more restraint in this formation. Our big, big problem is that we don't have the central midfield players to man the central midfield bit of 4-4-2 or 4-4-1-1 and I'm surprised we are playing it yet. I'd play 4-5-1 on Saturday for the first hour.

I hope on Saturday if Adkins plays the 4-4-1-1 he has Sharp up front supported by Scougall or Baxter who can help out a lot in midfield in the early exchanges. I'm afraid Adams was often seen in the second half tracking his full back usually ten yards behind him, he's a young lad with other things on his mind than defending. McNulty can play there and did well and would be a great sub after an hour in that spot.

Agree with all the ratings apart from Scougall at 8, rather a 7. He had the old "surge" back and made his own space time and again but then he lays it off sideways more often than not and rarely aims for the real danger areas for the opposition. I'm sure he could be more dangerous and hope the new manger can add assists and goals to his game. He needs encouragement to be more selfish and to be prepared to "fail" and lose the ball even by trying more ambitious, telling passes and runs.
 
Last edited:
I'd play 4-5-1 on Saturday for the first hour.

Formations are not my strongpoint but here goes anyway...

Has Adkins ever played 4-5-1 when we switch formations? I can't recall it.

I think it might be, "going forward" :confused:, that we play 4-4-2, or some variant, and look to strengthen midfield, either through players adapting or through transfers in and out.

If we have recruited relative lightweights in MF under Clough to play a 4-5-1 and we are switching to 4-4-2 then we'll need new players, or old players doing new things very well.
 
yes, some good performances apparently - well done to Freeman and Edgar especially.
Lets not forget, Morecambe are 4th tier and we scored in injury time after they lost 2 nil at the weekend to Hartlepool.
We beat a team we were expected to beat - especially with virtually our A team playing.
Good result, didn't concede and we move on. We did exactly the same last season - lost 1st game and won league cup game.
We move on to probably the worst type of test we need - a local team coming to BDTBL, especially after they have just beaten another local team.
Judgement reserved..............keep working Mr Adkins.
UTB
 
Formations are not my strongpoint but here goes anyway...

Has Adkins ever played 4-5-1 when we switch formations? I can't recall it.

I think it might be, "going forward" :confused:, that we play 4-4-2, or some variant, and look to strengthen midfield, either through players adapting or through transfers in and out.

If we have recruited relative lightweights in MF under Clough to play a 4-5-1 and we are switching to 4-4-2 then we'll need new players, or old players doing new things very well.


At the "Meet the Manager" evening Adkins said he could change formations three times in a game if need be. I think he touched on 3-5-2 but it's a bit hazy. That would be my choice for Saturday and most games in fact with the current squad of players.

The back 3 would be obvious at present and we have plenty of fit players even to man the front 7. Pace at the back is an issue but all 3 are experienced and hold the line where they want it, only venture out for set-pieces and supported by wing backs and defensive midfielder. For me Basham would be one of the three though, with McEveley or Collins as cover on the bench.
 
Encouraging news about Scougall. Keith Edwards also singled him out for praise on Tuesday, along with Freeman. I've always got a lot of time for players who visibly give a hundred per cent and a fit, in-form Scougall would be a real asset to us. I'm inclined to agree with WWF's comments about the need for him to take more risks but, overall, it's got to be good news if he can return to the standards of his first season.
 
Bergen Blade : Sterling stuff, as always.

Question for you: what single position do you think we need to sign someone for? Reading that, and some of the comments from Gillingham I think it's a GK. I know we need at least one CB as well, but we can just about squeak by for now. But both keepers sound well bellow par.
 
yes, some good performances apparently - well done to Freeman and Edgar especially.
Lets not forget, Morecambe are 4th tier and we scored in injury time after they lost 2 nil at the weekend to Hartlepool.
We beat a team we were expected to beat - especially with virtually our A team playing.
Good result, didn't concede and we move on. We did exactly the same last season - lost 1st game and won league cup game.
We move on to probably the worst type of test we need - a local team coming to BDTBL, especially after they have just beaten another local team.
Judgement reserved..............keep working Mr Adkins.
UTB


I think we are at least a month, maybe 6 weeks from Adkins knowing his best 11 and even his chosen formation. If he is determined to play 4-4-2 he needs a couple of players which sounds ridiculous considering our squad numbers, but true.

As pointed out by a number of posters at the time, this unsettled situation is the downside of changing managers in mid-summer. Not a problem for me personally but nevertheless a slow start to the season.

Agree Saturday is fraught but a good result would settle things down.
 
Bergen Blade : Sterling stuff, as always.

Question for you: what single position do you think we need to sign someone for? Reading that, and some of the comments from Gillingham I think it's a GK. I know we need at least one CB as well, but we can just about squeak by for now. But both keepers sound well bellow par.

Not really sure, but I think people are generally too critical of individual defenders.

I'm not very good at, or keen on, evaluating goalkeepers. It's seems so difficult to do anything about them! For defence and midfield you can mask weaknesses with good organisation and complementary attributes. I so want Long to do well, because he's got good physical attributes and just need to get stronger mentally. He shouldn't be written off after one game though. Same for Howard, some rustiness should be forgivable, hopefully he'll improve as he's had consistent spells before.

Getting the midfield right in a 4-4-2 is a real challenge. A lot of our midfielders have been used to playing with a central midfield trio, with one holding and two box to box players. IF Wallace remains fit I think he's got such good potential that it's worth building the team around him, so for now it's about finding the right partner for him and, but also the right wide men and the right combination up front.

Basham had a slow start last season too, but improved as he gained confidence. From an attacking perspective, to get the most out of Wallace, we'd ideally like someone who can hold onto the ball a bit more, allowing Wallace to find space further forward. A fit Coutts would be able to do this, but I'd worry about his and Wallace's abilty to cover enough ground defensively. Personally I would have bid for Sam Morsy this summer. I think he's looked strong and excellent defensively while also having some composure on the ball. I sometimes looked with envy at Chesterfield who had Morsy and Ryan doing so well for them and wondered if we could just sign both and then finally have our midfield sorted. But Morsy and Wallace would probably be even better. Anthony Grant at Crewe would have been another option, but he signed for Port Vale.
 



Bergen's reference to Sammon's goalscoring is borne out by his career statistics in the English League since 2011 :

Wigan played 32 -1 goal, Derby 83 - 10, Ipswich 19 -1, Rotherham 15 -3.

We should accept the lad for what he is and that is not a goalscorer as yet anyway. He has played at higher levels though.
 
Not really sure, but I think people are generally too critical of individual defenders.

I'm not very good at, or keen on, evaluating goalkeepers. It's seems so difficult to do anything about them! For defence and midfield you can mask weaknesses with good organisation and complementary attributes. I so want Long to do well, because he's got good physical attributes and just need to get stronger mentally. He shouldn't be written off after one game though. Same for Howard, some rustiness should be forgivable, hopefully he'll improve as he's had consistent spells before.

Getting the midfield right in a 4-4-2 is a real challenge. A lot of our midfielders have been used to playing with a central midfield trio, with one holding and two box to box players. IF Wallace remains fit I think he's got such good potential that it's worth building the team around him, so for now it's about finding the right partner for him and, but also the right wide men and the right combination up front.

Basham had a slow start last season too, but improved as he gained confidence. From an attacking perspective, to get the most out of Wallace, we'd ideally like someone who can hold onto the ball a bit more, allowing Wallace to find space further forward. A fit Coutts would be able to do this, but I'd worry about his and Wallace's abilty to cover enough ground defensively. Personally I would have bid for Sam Morsy this summer. I think he's looked strong and excellent defensively while also having some composure on the ball. I sometimes looked with envy at Chesterfield who had Morsy and Ryan doing so well for them and wondered if we could just sign both and then finally have our midfield sorted. But Morsy and Wallace would probably be even better. Anthony Grant at Crewe would have been another option, but he signed for Port Vale.


We need a Michael Doyle type of player:eek: - experienced positionally, ball winner, plug the gaps, talker, leader on the pitch, win it to feed creative players.
 
Bergen's reference to Sammon's goalscoring is borne out by his career statistics in the English League since 2011 :

Wigan played 32 -1 goal, Derby 83 - 10, Ipswich 19 -1, Rotherham 15 -3.

We should accept the lad for what he is and that is not a goalscorer as yet anyway. He has played at higher levels though.

I think Adkins saw him as a good partner for Sharp as he has a lot of the attributes that Sharp lacks, i.e. height, pace, mobility. If Sammon does the "dirty work" Sharp could be allowed to play the poacher role, and if Sharp scores, Sammon's lack of goals may be forgiven. Adams' form in pre season probably forced Adkins to start with him though. Will be interesting to see who starts tomorrow.
 
Think it was a decent game, certainly much better than I thought having listened to the radio.

Our formation was 4-4-1-1 with McNulty playing deeper than the main striker who was Sammon:

Howard
Freeman Edgar McEveley K.Wallace
Scougall Basham J.Wallace Woolford
McNulty
Sammon

Howard 5 - Not very convincing. Flapped at some crosses, lost an easy loose ball, was slow to get down when their free kick hit the post. His body language, the fact that he looks a bit more commanding than Long will probably make him a first choice on Saturday.

Freeman 9 - Excellent offensively and defensively. Constantly on the run forward, trying to contribute and help us create chances. Skilful and neat, combining well with Scougall, Wallace and McNulty in particular. I've seen people criticise his final ball. Don't agree with that, but often the problem was that Morecambe had so many players back that it was hard to find someone free in the box. There was one massively overhit cross at the end, and my suspicion is that a lot of people thought "he's been down that side a lot, but we haven't scored, i.e. his balls in haven't been good enough. Defensively he was also covering behind the centre halves a few times, although he was probably lucky to escape a sending off in the first half when his risky last ditch tackle saw him get very little of the ball.

Edgar 7 - Solid debut where he won every header. Also looked suprisingly good on the ball for a centre half. There was especially one touch and direct pass to Wallace that was superb. Some good passes apart from that too. There was one occasion on a defensive corner where he was blocked, therefore losing his man, and then desperately pulling him down. Think that would have been a penalty if the referee had seen it. Just before half time his man (Edwards) was allowed a free shot as well, not sure why Edgar lost him there.

McEveley 7 - Lost two headers first half and there was the odd pass that didn't find a team mate, but generally solid, calm and composed game. A few important blocks and challenges.

K.Wallace 6 - Doesn't look outstanding and I don't think he's a long term answer. I think he lacks pace and will struggle with quick and tricky wide men. He was in control most of the time vs Morecambe though and as he's a six footer he does make us a little bit stronger aerially.


Scougall 8 - Excellent and every bit as positive as in his first season. Took some time to get going, but eventually made himself available, found space, ran on the ball and tried penetrative passes. Linked well with teammates and Morecambe struggled to get near him, let alone stop him. Should gain confidence from this match as he looked to really enjoy it.

Basham 6,5 - Often looks a bit awkward and he is limited as a holding playmaker. Morecambe soon realised that it was his partner that was more important to close down, and thus Basham was often given a bit more time on the ball. As he's often a bit unsure of what to do, this slows our tempo down. Gave it away dangerously once or twice, but also won a lot of headers and got some challenges in. Agree with those saying he looks a bit lost in a central midfield duo though. Last season he was a ball winner/box to box man, so it's going to take a bit of getting used to for him to do this new role. I'd let him continue with Wallace for now though.

J.Wallace 8 - Excellent on the ball many times, lots of creative passes and through balls. Delighted to see him back and do so well. Was well closed down at the start of the game, but gradually started having more impact. Can get rid of a marker, run on the ball and spot runs into the box. Good corners too. At times (especially first half) he and Basham struggled to cover enough space behind them and that could be a problem in a 4-4-2. Clough would have gone mad if he'd seen the amount of times Morecambe found space between our defence and midfield. Disappeared later on and looked tired before he went off. Wallace must be a starter though, let's hope he stays fit.

Woolford 5 - Sadly I still haven't seen him play well, and it's time to let him start on the bench and see if he can come in and have a greater impact from there. Lacks pace for a wide man and doesn't seem exceptionally skilful. I think Adkins would like to see him chip in with goals, but he didn't threaten nor set anything of note up in this game.


McNulty 7 - Played behind Sammon and looked good when he got on the ball. His touch was good and he linked play a lot better than what he did last season. I think his fitness is improving after some reports of him looking heavier than before in the summer. He fluffed two good chances of scoring though. A third attempt looked a sure goal, but was blocked by a defender throwing himself at it.

Sammon 5,5 - You could see why he doesn't score many goals. Finished poorly when he got the chance. A second half back post header from a cross was his best effort. Worked pretty hard and is a good athlete and played a couple of decent passes. A better team player than goal getter.

--------------
Adams 6 - Came on at half time for Woolford and played on the left. More involved than MW, but not as impressive as in pre season. Their right back was a competitive, stocky guy, who didn't look easy to get past. Couldn't really make use of his pace, but had a couple of shots and won the corner that we scored from.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

As I said I think it was a decent game with some great performances and some mediocre. In the second half there looked to be a gulf in class and at times we almost got too much time and space on the ball - until we got the ball in the box! Morecambe dropped very deep at times and defended well in their box. If one of our earlier efforts had gone in I think we would have scored more.

Higher tempo may have helped break them down, but it's not easy to just switch that on. It could be necessary with a better playmaker than Basham (but then we'd possibly be overrun). No doubt Harris/Murphy would strengthen our left hand side, which wasn't great vs Morecambe. We must also look at which forwards will be our strongest and make sure we maintain enough pace in the side as we try to fix other things. In any case I think it was a definite step in the right direction.


Morecambe notes


  • Basham limited as a defensive playmaker
  • 4.25 Great Freeman run, almost sitter for McNulty - airshot
  • McNulty deeper than Sammon, 4-4-1-1?
  • Edgar looking comfortable on ball, good touch for a ch
  • Team looking a bit bigger and stronger. 6-7 six footers
  • Looking to Scougall to link play
  • Freeman good start
  • Our centre midfielders very well closed down, hard for us to use them
  • 15 mins M clean through, but Freeman gets a tackle in
  • Then good run and shot from McNulty
  • James Wallace corner looking good
  • Nice play Freeman-Wallace-Scougall, but poor cross from latter
  • McEveley takes out linesman
  • 20 mins Basham and Wallace struggling to cover enough space.
  • 20:30 typical Basham mistake
  • Good ball from McNulty to Sammon, but challenged - corner kick
  • Howard loses simple ball
  • Edgar is blocked at def corner, then probably fouls, but ref don't see it
  • Good ball from Wallace to McNulty, poor shot
  • Some decent, creative passes from Wallace
  • 25' M free kick hits post. Howard slow
  • 27 Superb ball from Wallace, Freeman's cross stopped
  • 28' Another dangerous corner from Wallace, flicked on at first post
  • 29 Great ball from Wallace to McNulty who sends Sammon clear. Poor finish wide
  • Edgar winning every header
  • 32' Freeman covering very well again
  • Once more good play from Wallace, getting forward
  • Freeman brilliant 1-2 with McNulty (superb chip). Volleyed shot wide
  • Well done Scougs, K. Wallace, McNulty
  • Superb defensive challenge from Freeman again
  • 41 Decent attack, but midfield then fail to get back to stop break, leading to dangerous M shot
  • Howard flaps at cross, dangerous, but shot blocked
  • 45 Edgar loses his man at corner, free shot


2nd half


  • Superb start by Scougall, run and sending Adams clear
  • Wallace-McNulty - good cross, Sammon header saved/blocked
  • 3' Scougs can't connect well enough on through ball
  • Good start
  • Wallace very close to sending Sammon clear again, looking excellent
  • Edgar free header from Scougall's corner, but poor connection
  • Great link play from Freeman, Scougs, Wallace.
  • 9' Unlucky Freeman cross
  • Blades dominating, good spell
  • Scougs looking good, bright, eager to find space, run on the ball and make penetrative passes. Not always got the accuracy
  • Sammon shot wide after Scougs winning back possession
  • Great possession play and good cross from Freeman
  • 19 McEv taking one for the team, booking after we lost balance
  • Scoug's task to block free kicks
  • Freeman cross, McNulty first time shot, far over. McNulty doing well though, finding space, distributing well.
  • 24 Blades finding a lot of space, looking far superior
  • 26 Freeman cross massively overhit (bumpy pitch??)
  • Another Sammon effort, doesn't look like a great finisher
  • McEve turned (clever, well done by M player)
  • Good effort at through ball from Sammon
  • Bash winning most headers in midfield
  • Wallace quieter as the match went on
  • Adams shot saved
  • Another McNulty shot blocked, looked a sure goal
  • Freeman alone against two M players, manages to stop the pass
  • 44 not great free kick from Adams
  • Adams wins the corner we scored from
  • Lot of game play, but Morecambe always good at having enough man back to block/prevent free shots

Good write up Bergen but have to disagree with a couple in particular. K Wallace may not be the long term answer but you have to mark him on his performance at Morecambe where he did nothing wrong so ithink a 6
is harsh. The other being Freeman who got on great positions offensively but his decision making and final balls when in those positions were dreadful so he'd get 7.5 or 8 from me.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom