McBurnie or Maupay

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Your choice...

  • McBurnie

    Votes: 394 66.9%
  • Maupay

    Votes: 195 33.1%

  • Total voters
    589



Update
Another for Maupay today and moves 4 ahead now. Scored another cracker today,

McBurnie 14 appearances 2 goals 2 yellows no reds
Maupay 16 appearances 6 goals 1 yellow no reds

McBurnie played 10 mins when we were seeing out the game. Your comparison isn’t right whether “he’s available” or not.
 
It’s a very grown up job he’s doing late in games at the minute. Mature performance today for the last 10.
I thought the same down at Wolves. He was eventually sitting in front of the midfield, deep into our half.
 
I'm still backing McBurnie. I think he's starting to really show some signs of a quality player. He will be a good player for us & if we had more creative midfield players he would have a better chance of starting. But while ever we're setting up with a flat 3, we need McGoldrick's superior link play.
 
. I don't go by minutes played as both players have been available.

No, you don't go by minutes played because it doesnt suit your argument.

The reason why McBurnie isn't playing is not because he's not as good as Maupay, it's because he's not as good as Mousset.
 
I'm sat on the bench on this still. Time will tell and bloody Didzy needs to score for confidence. McB needs a stellar game soon. He can do that for me on Boxing Day vs Tawfrod whilst I'm nailing the ale in the sun. And next Sat while I'm flying off.
 
Update

McBurnie 13 appearances 2 goals 2 yellows no reds

Maupay 15 appearances 5 goals 1 yellow no reds

3 goals ahead

Remember that McBurnie has been fit to play. It's your managers choice to play him or not.
Update
Another for Maupay today and moves 4 ahead now. Scored another cracker today,

McBurnie 14 appearances 2 goals 2 yellows no reds
Maupay 16 appearances 6 goals 1 yellow no reds
Wasn't really a cracker was appalling goalkeeping
Enjoy being reading 2.0
 
It’s the same arguement. Totally different types of strikers, so it’s difficult to compare Maupay with McBurnie.

Wilder had success last season with a front two or Sharp & McGoldrick, so his task was to bring in younger versions of those two.

Basically Wilder saw Maupay as a younger version of Sharp and he saw McBurnie as a replacement for McBurnie....
his assist stats were very impressive last season and McB gives us a bit more physicality.

Mousset was seen as a punt on a young lad with big potential...who never had the chance at Bournmouth due to them having strikers in great form.
Also believe Wilder thought Maupay and Mouset would both help each other settle with them both being French.
 
Update
Another for Maupay today and moves 4 ahead now. Scored another cracker today,

McBurnie 14 appearances 2 goals 2 yellows no reds
Maupay 16 appearances 6 goals 1 yellow no reds
Can some statto come up with a minutes played ratio for this plank to digest.........I’ve got a life to live.
 
Can some statto come up with a minutes played ratio for this plank to digest.........I’ve got a life to live.

McBurnie 616 Minutes Played - 2 Goals
Maupay 1160 Minutes Played - 6 Goals

McBurnie points per appearance 1.428
Maupay points per appearance 1.187
 
Can some statto come up with a minutes played ratio for this plank to digest.........I’ve got a life to live.
The only one that matters is that Brighton signed a vastly superior PL CF for the same money as we paid out.

Other than that, McBurnie is a different type of striker, bought to effectively replace Leon. Maupay would have been to replace Sharp.

Wilder will be in the market for a Maupay type in the not too distant.

UTB
 
The most important point is that Maupay didn't particularly want to join Utd whereas McBurnie did.

Good luck to Maupay who appears to be doing well at Brighton but I'd much rather have players who are desperate to join and play for the club. McBurnie will, I'm sure, make a significant contribution throughout the remainder of the season.
 



OK, it might have been an 'either' or for us, we don't know for certain but they play a different role. A better comparison is Maupay v Moose in terms of the role they play for the team.
 
Update

3 in 3 for Maupay. Lots of humble pie in this thread methinks. 5 ahead now.

Maupay
17 Appearances 7 goals 1 yellows 0 reds

McBurnie
15 Appearances 2 goals 2 yellows 0 reds
 
Update

3 in 3 for Maupay. Lots of humble pie in this thread methinks. 5 ahead now.

Maupay
17 Appearances 7 goals 1 yellows 0 reds

McBurnie
15 Appearances 2 goals 2 yellows 0 reds

What is funny....in fact it's hilarious, is that you spent 20m quid on someone who'd only commit to 2 years.

In other words...another stepping stone and you won't see the majority of the 20m quid back.
 
Lots of humble pie in this thread methinks

Methinks we don't give a shit about a player who didn't want to join us.

Jamie Vardy has more goals than both of them put together but he was never going to join us, so any 'comparison' would be pointless.

What you don't understand, is that arguably our most effective forward player this season has been McGoldrick and he has the grand total of NO goals. As long as the team is winning we are happy.

You stick to your Maupay >> McBurnie stat.

I prefer 7th in the table to 13th, as it happens......
 
Update

3 in 3 for Maupay. Lots of humble pie in this thread methinks. 5 ahead now.

Maupay
17 Appearances 7 goals 1 yellows 0 reds

McBurnie
15 Appearances 2 goals 2 yellows 0 reds
Maupays having a cracking season, but as was said previously, the better comparison is between Maupay and Mousset.
 
Methinks we don't give a shit about a player who didn't want to join us.

Jamie Vardy has more goals than both of them put together but he was never going to join us, so any 'comparison' would be pointless.

What you don't understand, is that arguably our most effective forward player this season has been McGoldrick and he has the grand total of NO goals. As long as the team is winning we are happy.

You stick to your Maupay >> McBurnie stat.

I prefer 7th in the table to 13th, as it happens......
These lot already have 1 fake rivalry, it's no surprise this clown is trying to fashion another.
 
Methinks we don't give a shit about a player who didn't want to join us.

Jamie Vardy has more goals than both of them put together but he was never going to join us, so any 'comparison' would be pointless.

What you don't understand, is that arguably our most effective forward player this season has been McGoldrick and he has the grand total of NO goals. As long as the team is winning we are happy.

You stick to your Maupay >> McBurnie stat.

I prefer 7th in the table to 13th, as it happens......
What you fail to understand which is quite simple really is that this thread is about Maupay and McBurnie only. READ THE THREAD TITLE STARTED BY ONE OF YOUR OWN FANS AND LET THAT SINK IN!!!
There is no point mentioning any other player, it's irrelevant.
 
Update

3 in 3 for Maupay. Lots of humble pie in this thread methinks. 5 ahead now.

Maupay
17 Appearances 7 goals 1 yellows 0 reds

McBurnie
15 Appearances 2 goals 2 yellows 0 reds

Points per appearance

Maupay 1.176
McBurnie 1.533

Also humble pie is reserved for someone saying someone isn't good enough, no-one said Maupay wasn't good enough, but he didn't want to come so it's not like we made a bad decision is it? You may as well go on Wycombe Wanderers forum and post his stats, they also had no opportunity to buy him.
 
What you fail to understand which is quite simple really is that this thread is about Maupay and McBurnie only. READ THE THREAD TITLE STARTED BY ONE OF YOUR OWN FANS AND LET THAT SINK IN!!!
There is no point mentioning any other player, it's irrelevant.
What you fail to understand is that no one is interested in your opinion.
 
What you fail to understand which is quite simple really is that this thread is about Maupay and McBurnie only. READ THE THREAD TITLE STARTED BY ONE OF YOUR OWN FANS AND LET THAT SINK IN!!!
There is no point mentioning any other player, it's irrelevant.

You’re one boring fucker, you do know that right?
 
Update

3 in 3 for Maupay. Lots of humble pie in this thread methinks. 5 ahead now.

Maupay
17 Appearances 7 goals 1 yellows 0 reds

McBurnie
15 Appearances 2 goals 2 yellows 0 reds

A team is often better than the sum of their parts.
 



What you fail to understand which is quite simple really is that this thread is about Maupay and McBurnie only. READ THE THREAD TITLE STARTED BY ONE OF YOUR OWN FANS AND LET THAT SINK IN!!!
There is no point mentioning any other player, it's irrelevant.

Steve doesn't understand context. Or that posters who go on rival boards come across either as friendless trolls without any social skills, or obsequious Uriah Heep types.

A question as to whether goals are the best way to compare these two players is highly relevant. You may prize a player for his value to the team above the goals he scores, for which the obvious example is McGoldrick.

As it is even Steve's stats are misleading because while Maupay has done well to score 7 times so far (and perhaps earn the move to Sevilla he was afraid to chance in the summer), he's played twice as many minutes as McBurnie.

Maupay still has a scoring rate twice that of McBurnie even after that, but even given the difference in time spent on the pitch:

Tackles won: Maupay 4 McBurnie 6
Clearances: Mauapy 5 McBurnie 22
Headed Clearances: Maupay 1 McBurnie 20
Aerial battles won: Maupay 13 McBurnie 60
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom