North East Blade
Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2017
- Messages
- 774
- Reaction score
- 2,342
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Redknapp is his uncle.I thought Derby were skirting close to FFP.
How can they spend 11.5m on Waghorn and the winger from Brentford?
Like father like son, spunking moneh where there isn’t any!
I thought Derby were skirting close to FFP.
How can they spend 11.5m on Waghorn and the winger from Brentford?
Like father like son, spunking moneh where there isn’t any!
Nahki WellsSo if we've missed out on Gallagher, Hogan, Waghorn and Nugent, who's next?
Nahki Wells
I think it has been quoted that Southampton want £7m for Gallagher and someone on here said £3m for ArmstrongLet them have him.
Go in and spend £2 on Adam Armstrong and £3 million on Gallagher.
That would give us 5 strikers with an almost perfect balance between them.
We'd be able to play them two upfront, big man little man type partnership but without the long ball. Gallagher coming slightly deeper and looking for space, Armstrong off the shoulder running in behind and making space for the likes of Duffy/Fleck to exploit. If either or both score goals, we could be looking at the strike force to get us out of this league, or sell them both for a combined fee of around £25 million this time next year.
These signings would excite me much more than a 29 year old Waghorn.
Or maybe worth next to nothing because he's an untried youngster playing at a lower level that couldn't bridge the gap.If we actually are willing to spend £5 million then we really can be doing better than Waghorn in my opinion.
He’s not young and his scoring record is only average at best.
I’d like to see us move on personally, if we’re spending £5 million it should be on a player under 25 that could double in value in a year or two.
Or maybe worth next to nothing because he's an untried youngster playing at a lower level that couldn't bridge the gap.
Wilder has already said that he's not going to do that. "We're only looking to bring players in that will improve the group immediately" his words, not mine.Ofcourse that’s a possibility. However, if you give Wilder £5m, id like to think he’d invest it wisely. Furthermore, you could sign 3/4 promising young talents. Where only 1 would need to come good for us to make profit. Seems to make slightly more sense to me.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?