Maddy Cusack - SUFC Investigation Statement

[Bartleby]

An incredible stretch ?
Maddy left a previous club due to how she was being treated and then that same person arrives at the very same club.
You don't think that could be an issue at all ?

Similar thing happened to me once, a manager I detested working for rocked up at the place I moved to, and I did have to work for them again for a while. So I can sympathise with how she must have felt when he turned up at SUFC.

 

[Bladey_blade]

Suppose it depends on what evidence of "wrongdoing" they have and whether or not they gain access to the documentation from the inquest.

Playing devil's advocate the concealment of documents could be protective for both sides, it'll leave a bittee taste for the family to be shown names who didn't corroborate their findings and it may also have some things they may not want/need to hear in there

 

[Bladesman]

Sounds like we have made a horrible botch of the investigation.. The optics on this look absolutely terrible

I thought this was an independent investigation that the family were in favour of?

 

[Harry's Game]

I thought this was an independent investigation that the family were in favour of?

Sounds like they were unaware they would not get to see the report though

 

[Sheffsteel]

Sounds like they were unaware they would not get to see the report though

It depends what's in the report but there could be data protection issues.
Imagine if some players or staff gave some evidence with direct quotes
and the family say this and decided to question, even intimidate the players who gave evidence against their daughter.

Professional sport has a cut throat culture.....it's the norm where many players are generally treat like things/ assets instead of people.
It's been accepting as the norm in mens football for decades. You only have to listen to the "Under the Cosh" YouTube site to see how male players have been treat arguably appallingly, when managers and players have had fallouts and almost come to blows
but the manager would always say they are paid to make the difficult decisions, you only have to think back to Brian Clough
he used to often play mind games with his players but his unusual psychology tactics worked.

Some managers and players just don't get on, no matter what, so either the manager or the player has to leave that club if they wish to progress their career. I've seen these types of things several times, everywhere I've worked over the decades.
It's generally been worse in all male groups, mixed groups of male/ female staff have always been more harmonious.

 

[Rodders]

I thought this was an independent investigation that the family were in favour of?

I suspect they were probably in favour of stuff like her name being spelled correctly and her dad not being referred to as an employee.

 

[s4-blade]

There's a piece - "why her family want a new investigation into her death" in The Athletic this morning.
No paywall

Special report: Maddy Cusack - why her family want a new investigation into her death

The heartbreaking story of a talented and popular footballer, her tragic death, and why her family want a new investigation

theathletic.com

Realistically, as someone who was involved in a decent level of football for quite a while, this doesn’t seem any different to situations going off at 3/4 of clubs in the top 10 divisions of the pyramid. Despite the athletic (who can’t even be arsed to report on our club any more by the way) attempting to create a shit storm and stir up controversy for their own cause.

Bomb squads exist for a reason, fitness plans exist for a reason, being dropped happens for a reason, managers favouring players they can trust happens for a reason. it’s a results based industry. All the complaints sound like just regular football stuff, and you’ve either got it in you or you haven’t.

Now whether that is right is another question and debate entirely. One which I don’t particularly want to get into because my personal experience will probably put me on the more controversial side of the fence in terms of this thread, and out of respect I’d like to avoid that.

 

[Badger Blade]

I thought this was an independent investigation that the family were in favour of?

In favour of it happening but not necessarily in favour of the findings, knowing what they do about their side of the situation vs what was fed back through the club's statement. Seems like the club is marking its own homework to try and make it go away, bit like the whole Post Office thing in some senses.

Poor Maddy would have been in all sorts of quandaries about her job at the club, her role as a player and having just bought a house, alongside the fact that she wasn't on a lot of money either. It's different in the men's game at the top end because for many of them, they can just up sticks and go elsewhere and can easily suck up the cost of moving house. The women's game is essentially semi-pro without as many options when it comes to moving clubs - she wouldn't have been able to afford to go out on loan and live in a hotel for 6 months until Morgan disappeared but still work her job at the club at the same time and keep the mortgage paid.

The whole dynamic behind the scenes in football is still very much teacher/pupil, sergeant major type stuff as opposed to grown adults debating things properly and finding a mutually agreed solution.

Seems like, unintentionally, she'd been boxed into a corner when JM turned up and saw no other way out.

 

[Pintor75]

So many ways people can read into this, from the club, the manager, the family and Maddy's position and still not get the answer you/they wan, it's so trajic and where does it end?

 

[Sheffsteel]

Now whether that is right is another question and debate entirely. One which I don’t particularly want to get into because my personal experience will probably put me on the more controversial side of the fence in terms of this thread, and out of respect I’d like to avoid that.

Good post and very considerate.

Agree...it's quite an alien concept for us old'uns because we were brought up that tough love/ touch encouragement was normal.
Life was sometimes harsh but you accepted it and got on with it. Brian Clough was worshipped as one of the best football managers ever but he was quite eccentric and his methods were arguably bullying but that's what made him a genius, he knew when to push players up making them feel special and when to teach them a lesson and bring them down a peg or two. He could be a bit of a bully but he always held massive respect.

In the 70's and 80's mental fragility was frowned upon, seen as a weakness (especially amongst men) and hidden.
The message was always "toughen up or ship out", the military services used to brag about it that hard level of treatment.
As already mentioned it's such a difficult subject to discuss when there's been a death, must be torture for the family.

 

[Tony Currie]

Similar thing happened to me once, a manager I detested working for rocked up at the place I moved to, and I did have to work for them again for a while. So I can sympathise with how she must have felt when he turned up at SUFC.

This happens so much - usually the person complaining(the whistle blower) is the one who suffers. Look at all those poor sods at the Post Office!

An open and honest management would publish the independent report.

 

[nopigfansintown]

Playing devil's advocate the concealment of documents could be protective for both sides, it'll leave a bittee taste for the family to be shown names who didn't corroborate their findings and it may also have some things they may not want/need to hear in there

I would imagine the club would be bound by data protection laws - even if they wanted to release the full investigation. Maybe they could release a heavily redacted version, but then what's the point? The participants in the inquiry are free to talk to the family off their own bat about their contribution. There seems to be an illusion to that having happened in some cases in the above article. I hope they all do.

I think this is about setting the stall out for another enquiry, with a scope that encompasses everything the family want it too. The hash of the basics the guy employed by SUFC has made throws his general diligence into doubt, so I presume it will happen. I think it's erroneous to presume the club are responsible for the scope of the current report though. This seems to be the implication.That would be a key question I'd want answering: who decided the scope of the existing investigation? Was this done independently or was it the club who oversaw that?
Whether there's some sort of smoking gun being concealed, I don't know, but if there is I hope it's found.

I don't envy female players who have the dual role as non football employee at a club. Either of those two roles could impact the other. I don't see how that's a good situation for either party, especially in a career as fragile as "football player".

 

[Klaatu Barada Nikto]

.
Life was sometimes harsh and you accepted it and got on with it. Brian Clough was worshipped as one of the best football managers ever but he was quite eccentric and his methods were arguably bullying but that's what made him a genius, he knew when to push players up making them feel special and when to teach them a lesson and bring them down a peg or two. He always held massive respect.

Unless the footballer was gay of course!

 

[BladeByChoice]

There seem to be more questions than answers. I suspect the club would like us to think that it just stems from a clash of personalities but it would be interesting to hear more from Delroy Hall;-

'In the meantime, the club’s chaplain, Delroy Hall, has resigned from his role. Among a number of wide-ranging complaints, Hall informed the club that he felt ignored by a number of people in senior positions after he, an experienced counsellor, tried to help staff cope with their grief in light of Cusack’s death.'

There is no way that we know, or will ever know if Mr Hall was interviewed as part of the report and it would be wrong of anyone to speculate either way, but I don’t like the way that paragraph is tacked on at the end, as if its related but not important, if ever a man was qualified to council people through grief, its him.
He should have been the first person that the club turned to for advice and he has resigned for feeling ignored.
I can’t put my finger on it, but something is very wrong here.

https://www.delwes.com/home/about

 

[Berkshire Blade]

I saw the family of hers complaining none of the teammate are following a certain twitter account. One player replied to it suggesting that don't fully agree with the way the family are going about things.

They lost a teammate and know far more about the situation. I'm led by that in my take on this subject

 

[loveWalrusDaveTheBlade]

This happens so much - usually the person complaining(the whistle blower) is the one who suffers. Look at all those poor sods at the Post Office!

An open and honest management would publish the independent report.

The investigators conducted their interviews having stated that the identities of those being interviewed would not be made public. They presumably felt this helpful in encouraging people to be fully open and forthcoming, thus bringing the best insight into their work. Having done this, we can hardly expect the report to be published - even with redaction of specific identities it would be easy to identify specific contributors, resulting in a huge breach of professional trust.
I’m not seeking to defend United in their handling of this case - I don’t know enough about it to have a strong view - but I do think it unfair to imply criticism of our management in not publishing the report. They are simply behaving professionally by complying with the process through which it was generated.

 

[Shawy24]

I saw the family of hers complaining none of the teammate are following a certain twitter account. One player replied to it suggesting that don't fully agree with the way the family are going about things.

They lost a teammate and know far more about the situation. I'm led by that in my take on this subject

You sure that was exactly what was said?

 

[Champagneblade]

Out of respect to the deceased I’d prefer to not comment further on the ins and outs. It’s very difficult to place yourself in somebody else’s shoes when you’re not them.

I don’t mind commenting on United though. At first I applauded the independent investigation.

I also completely understand the need to keep private who was questioned, given the fairness that anonymity brings.

Given the apparent closeness to the family and desire to do right by them, I’m a little perplexed why the findings should be sealed from them, especially if the outcome isn’t meriting Jonathan Morgan leaving.

If you have nothing to hide and have the family’s best interest at heart, isn’t the best way at achieving closure sharing the outcome of the independent investigation which was welcomed by all?

 

[Sheffsteel]

Unless the footballer was gay of course!

Assume you're talking about Justin Fashanu.

Don't know the full story about how Cloughie treat JF.
I would imagine he'd have been focused on the football side and quite dismissive/ ignorant of his personal side,
with subtle gay jokes thrown in. It was common place to joke about things you didn't understand.

My memories of Fashanu will always be that brilliant volley from Fashanu against Ray Clemence on Match of the Day when Norwich played Liverpool. I'm looking at Wikipedia, never realised Fashanu played for some many clubs all over the world.
He never seemed to stay at any club for long. Heard John Fashanu doing an interview about him once and he said his older brother was always troubled and he sometimes feels guilty about not doing enough to support him. Homosexuality was a massive taboo in the Nigerian culture.

 

[Bladey_blade]

I would imagine the club would be bound by data protection laws - even if they wanted to release the full investigation. Maybe they could release a heavily redacted version, but then what's the point? The participants in the inquiry are free to talk to the family off their own bat about their contribution. There seems to be an illusion to that having happened in some cases in the above article. I hope they all do.

I think this is about setting the stall out for another enquiry, with a scope that encompasses everything the family want it too. The hash of the basics the guy employed by SUFC has made throws his general diligence into doubt, so I presume it will happen. I think it's erroneous to presume the club are responsible for the scope of the current report though. This seems to be the implication.That would be a key question I'd want answering: who decided the scope of the existing investigation? Was this done independently or was it the club who oversaw that?
Whether there's some sort of smoking gun being concealed, I don't know, but if there is I hope it's found.

I don't envy female players who have the dual role as non football employee at a club. Either of those two roles could impact the other. I don't see how that's a good situation for either party, especially in a career as fragile as "football player".

Do we keep having inquiries again and again though until the family can finally pin it on someone/anyone? Sometimes people just do what poor Maddy did without it being any individuals fault

 

[Bladeloyal]

Close this tread .it's not healthy

 

[WF10BLADE]

I don't think it's right this thread can't the lady be left to RIP?

 

[CambridgeshireBlade]

Is it any different to how many male players must feel with the same merry-go-round of managers in the PL? doubt it

still needs investigating, and I think the thread should be locked out of respect because none of us know anything about it directly

 

[blade too long]

++ Some people die young , when I was a local referee a young man of 25 dropped dead and we abandoned the game
I attended the enquiry but could offer nothing but sympathy, First half he ran around like the rest then just collapsed in the other half

People want answers but at times there are none except their life had expired
Dont know what circumstances that surround Maddys death but people need to blame someone, sometimes unfairly
I dont know the coach either so again cant form an opinion
where do you draw the line at shouting at people
warnock used to throw tea cups and abuse players, watch united united episodes of him chuntering on at staff

twitter , sorry X is not the place to discuss this and listening to people who shout the loudest is a poor way to debate

 

[FMBlade1]

Front page of the Daily Mail online now.

 

[Camden Blade]

From The Athletic today. Posted without comment. Not sure I want to comment but this is the article. It's long...

Special report: Maddy Cusack - why her family want a new investigation into her death

The heartbreaking story of a talented and popular footballer, her tragic death, and why her family want a new investigation

theathletic.com

It is the heartbreaking story of a talented and popular footballer, her tragic death and the investigation into a family’s complaints about what they believe caused her emotional anguish.

Maddy Cusack’s death in September sent shockwaves throughout the sport and plunged Sheffield United into a state of mourning for their longest-serving player. As her parents, David and Deborah, tried to get through their first Christmas without their eldest daughter, fans launched a petition to retire her No 8 shirt as a permanent tribute.

“She fell in love with Sheffield United, the fans and the city of Sheffield,” Deborah told a memorial service in October. “Maddy became Miss Sheffield United and adored every minute of it. This was her home, the place she envisioned she would hang up her boots one day.”

Cusack started playing football at the age of five and spent time in the junior setups at Chesterfield, Nottingham Forest and Leicester City before being taken on by Aston Villa and representing England’s under-19s. An energetic, tough-tackling midfielder, she went on to play for Birmingham City and Leicester City before moving to Sheffield, where she became the team’s first women’s player to make more than 100 appearances.

That everything ended so tragically has caused immeasurable hurt for Cusack’s family. It also led to the club commissioning an investigation, on the family’s request, and an announcement from Bramall Lane shortly before Christmas that “there was no evidence of any wrongdoing”.

What has never been reported, however, is what compelled the family to make an official complaint and what, they believe, led a previously happy 27-year-old to take her own life.

Their complaint stretched to seven pages and more than 3,350 words. It was written by David, an experienced solicitor, and details a wide range of grievances relating to Cusack’s last seven months at the club — coinciding with the appointment of Jonathan Morgan as the team’s manager.

“There were a number of factors that troubled her in the end, but they all spring from the relationship with JM (Morgan),” the complaint states. “As she confided to us (her family), every issue had its origin in JM’s appointment. We know she would still be with us had he not been appointed. Her text messages and conversations support this.”

The allegations were serious enough for the club to arrange an external inquiry that concluded on December 15 with the chief executive, Stephen Bettis, writing to Cusack’s family to confirm no disciplinary action was being taken against Morgan.

Morgan, who had previously been Cusack’s manager at Leicester, vehemently denied treating her unfavourably and has been vindicated by a nine-week inquiry. His account was that he had tried to be a positive influence in her life and that it was completely unfounded to suggest their working relationship had contributed to her emotional anguish and, ultimately, death.

In a letter to the family, Bettis stated that none of the people interviewed for the inquiry had “heard or witnessed any bullying or inappropriate behaviour” towards Cusack or any other player. He did, however, acknowledge that Morgan’s behaviour “divided opinion” among the people interviewed. Some found him supportive and caring. Others described Morgan’s style of management as “isolating some players, quite authoritative and intimidating”. According to the family, that was very much Cusack’s experience as she reported it to them.

Against that backdrop, the English Football Association (FA) has subsequently begun to gather evidence ahead of a possible investigation of its own. The players’ union, the Professional Footballers’ Association, is understood to be supporting the family and, with the matter ongoing, it also raises a wider debate that goes to the very heart of what is acceptable in a football environment and what is not.

It has also transpired that Morgan, appointed in February last year, has been the subject of two previous complaints, unrelated to Cusack, including one from another United player towards the end of last season. The club will not discuss its outcome.

The other case involved a complaint being lodged against Morgan while he was coaching Leicester, where one of his sisters, Jade, was the general manager, another, Holly, was the team captain, and their father, Rohan, was the chairman. The complaint, it is understood, related to alleged bullying and exclusion and was dealt with, for the most part, by Jade. The player in question left the club after accepting a financial settlement in relation to her contract, with the complaint not being taken further. Morgan denied any wrongdoing in both cases.

In Cusack’s case, the family’s complaint alleged:

Cusack left Leicester in 2019 because she was convinced Morgan, then the manager, had taken a personal dislike to her and felt worn down by his behaviour.

Morgan went on to manage Burnley’s women’s team and, when she played against them for United, he called her a “psycho” when she ran near his dugout. She was not unduly bothered because he was no longer her manager but saw it as further evidence that he disliked her.

His appointment at Sheffield United left her feeling anxious about their history but hopeful, as an established first-team player, that they could put it behind them. Instead, he dropped her from the starting line-up, complaining she was overweight, and allegedly told other players about their previous issues, which she felt created the impression she was difficult to manage.

She feared history was repeating itself but stayed at Sheffield United because of her affinity with the club and all the friends she had made. She had bought a house, taken jobs in United’s community and marketing departments, and enjoyed her happiest times in football at Bramall Lane.

She found it difficult to understand the issues with Morgan because she had never encountered any conflict from previous managers and was popular within the club.

Cusack became unwell as a result of the anxiety it created, resulting in her moving back in with her parents, being prescribed medication and asking the club’s doctor at the start of September about counselling

The complaint was delivered to the club on September 27, a week after Cusack’s body was found at her parents’ house in Derbyshire. An inquest has been opened into her death and the police say there are no suspicious circumstances.

According to the family’s evidence, Cusack had complained during numerous conversations about feeling marginalised and encountering “personal antipathy” from Morgan in what has been described by some former team-mates as a tough, divisive and often hard-faced environment. This had a devastating impact on her mental health, her family say, breaking her confidence at a time when she had the pressures of juggling her playing career with working for the club as a marketing executive.

Bettis reiterated his sympathies for the family’s loss and said the club wanted to support the charity foundation that had been set up in Cusack’s name, raising money to help young, female footballers. But he also made it clear that the family would not be allowed to see Shotton’s report. Nor will it be released publicly, meaning there is no way for them to find out what testimony was put forward, who was interviewed and, perhaps just as importantly, who was not.

Although the family have declined to comment, this has been particularly hard for them to accept: that they could ask for the club to hold an investigation but then be denied the right to know what exactly is in that investigation, even on an anonymised basis.

---

People who knew Cusack well talk about an all-round athlete who was devoted to fitness and healthy living and kept herself in supreme shape, going back to her days as a talented runner with Derbyshire’s Amber Valley & Erewash Athletics Club.

In 2021, she hired her own strength and conditioning coach, Luke Ashton, who has worked with Leicester City and Mansfield Town, and he remembers her test results being higher in some categories than the average of the England national team.

“She was phenomenal,” says Ashton. “Everyone knows Maddy was a devoted and extremely dedicated athlete. Her application, effort levels and enthusiasm were second to none. For her to reach out to me when she already had such a demanding schedule just shows how dedicated she was.”

puns as a form of gallows humour to keep up their spirits. If they were given playing time, they joked they were “on parole”. Morgan was referred to as the “prison warden”.

Another of Cusack’s former team-mates, Player B, recalls Morgan getting the job and quickly establishing a strong relationship with certain players, inviting them into his office and generally being approachable and amenable. But she recalls seeing a different side to him when it came to a number of players who were a bit older on average and treated, she says, in an entirely different fashion.

“When Jonathan came in, there was almost a sense of a new beginning for some people. But others weren’t given a chance from the minute he stepped through the door,” says Player B.

“He wouldn’t make eye contact. He’d walk past in the training ground and say nothing. (Players were) getting the cold shoulder for pretty much no reason. If he decided he didn’t want you, that was it. He’s not going to give you the time of day, he’s not going to shake your hand, he’s not even going to make eye contact. You have no chance.”

“I would literally have to pull over on the way to training because I was crying so I could wipe my eyes and see where I was driving. I genuinely felt I had no value, not only as a player but as a person.”

Of Cusack, she added: “There were a lot (of players) last season who were in the same boat and it could have been any of us. It feels awful coming out of my mouth, but there were at least four or five players who were on that path and, fortunately, could escape it.”

---

Morgan has been reluctant to speak publicly, according to people close to him, because of the sensitivities surrounding the case and for fear of it causing further upset for a family who are, ultimately, grieving a loved one. He has declined The Athletic’s request for an interview.

Instead, his management company has been dealing with media inquiries on his behalf. He is said to have found it traumatic to be accused and feels vindicated, yet not surprised, by Shotton’s findings.

There are, however, a number of issues arising from this case and, on a wider level, it does lead to a separate debate about some of the accepted norms in a dressing-room environment and how football, as a workplace, can be very different to other walks of life.

Morgan does not deny that he could be blunt with his language, including one dressing-room scene when one of his players broke down in tears after he identified, and criticised, her for being to blame for one of the opposition’s goals.

Even the people who speak positively about Morgan describe him as being direct and to the point. There have been times when he could get angry, in common with many football managers. However, he has always maintained that this did not involve Cusack, that it was never personal with anyone, and that it was quite normal for a manager to dish out some harsh words if the team were doing badly.

In a lot of cases, there are members of his profession, including some highly successful managers, who are championed for their occasional outbursts of temper and authoritarian style. Many clubs operate “bomb squads” for players who have been frozen out and marginalised. It is, in many ways, an accepted part of the football industry.

Sheffield United were in the lower reaches of the Women’s Championship last season, finishing eighth in a 12-team league. It was, says Player B, a challenging campaign in all sorts of ways. “It didn’t feel like a team any more. It didn’t feel like people had each other’s backs. Some people didn’t know where they stood, others were like his (Morgan’s) best mate and in his office all the time.”

Cusack, from a family of Derby County fans, was in her sixth season at Bramall Lane and her popularity can be gauged by the volume of tributes after her death. Her family say they have been overwhelmed by the public’s kindness and, having set up the Maddy Cusack Foundation in November, the response of United’s fans, in particular.

“Those who knew Maddy well will be aware she had no long-standing mental health issues or troubles,” read a social media post from the foundation. “Maddy was a happy-go-lucky, carefree girl with everything to live for and, by last Christmas (2022), could be described as being at her happiest. This all changed gradually from February.”

Some people will inevitably ask why, if she became so unhappy, she did not try to find another club.

Cusack, who was in and out of Morgan’s team, signed a one-year contract at the end of June ahead of the club’s transition to a full-time operation. She did that, according to her family, because she had settled in Sheffield, did not want to leave a club she loved, and had the financial pressures and obligations of being a homeowner.

Her family say they had numerous conversations with her about the impact her work life was having on her confidence and health. The family’s complaint says Cusack and her mother discussed many of the issues about Morgan often. Maddy decided, they say, not to do anything that might risk upsetting her manager. One colleague, it is said, was aware of how Cusack felt and told her to “kill him with kindness”.

Instead, her death has left the Cusack family — including Maddy’s brother, Richard, and sisters, Olivia and Felicia — trying to come to terms with what her mother has described as an “unthinkable, unimaginable and unbearable” loss.

Morgan’s sympathisers say that he, too, has suffered and that his family have found it incredibly difficult to see his name attached to such a heartbreaking story.

This weekend, however, he will be back in the dugout when United, eighth in the Women’s Championship, travel to London for an FA Women’s Cup fourth-round tie against Tottenham Hotspur. It will be his first appearance in the dugout since a 1-0 victory over Lewes on September 17, sitting out 11 fixtures while the investigation was underway.

In a statement published on United’s website on December 18, the club announced the investigation had been completed and, without mentioning Morgan once, said they wanted “to increase the learning and development opportunities for all staff around language and culture, welfare and mental health awareness”.

The club were “always looking for ways to evolve and will reflect on the outcomes and recommendations arising from the investigation to consider how processes and policies may be improved”.

What has not been made clear is whether those recommendations refer to Morgan specifically or just the club in general. Nor is that likely to change given United will not let anybody know, including the family.

That, however, is unlikely to be the end of the matter.

David Matthews, the FA’s senior integrity investigations manager, has already started interviewing Cusack’s close relatives, as well as visiting the club, as part of the governing body’s evidence-gathering process. If that leads to a new investigation, it may take a wider scope than Shotton’s inquiry and examine Morgan’s time at Leicester and Burnley.

Even then, however, it is unclear whether United will pass over the details of their own report to the FA’s investigators.

The club have been asked by The Athletic, among a number of questions relating to the case, but declined to respond other than referring back to their previous statement. “The independent investigation commissioned by the club at the request of, and in cooperation with, Maddy’s family concluded in December,” said a club spokesman. “The valuable input provided by the key witnesses put forward by Maddy’s family and by the club was thoroughly reviewed and no evidence of wrongdoing was found.”

In the meantime, the club’s chaplain, Delroy Hall, has resigned from his role. Among a number of wide-ranging complaints, Hall informed the club that he felt ignored by a number of people in senior positions after he, an experienced counsellor, tried to help staff cope with their grief in light of Cusack’s death.

 

[Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou]

Busted.. You definitely have mattbianco1 on ignore!

(Same thread underneath this ha)

 

[Silent Blade]

Merge threads please

 

[loveWalrusDaveTheBlade]

View attachment 177291

Front page of the Daily Mail online now.

Disgusting rag of a ‘newspaper’.

 

[Camden Blade]

Busted.. You definitely have mattbianco1 on ignore!

(Same thread underneath this ha)

Ah. I thought that was just the SUFC statement. Busted.