Balham Blade
S24SU Seer
Nah, just trying to help. Like whoring is copy-pasting a statement from a former managerLike whore!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Nah, just trying to help. Like whoring is copy-pasting a statement from a former managerLike whore!
Was being seriousNot sure if serious but...
- £38m to buy the stadium, less than expected
- expect a loss in 20/21 with wages up significantly and revenue down £20-£30m (from £143m in 19/20)
- relegation reduces TV money from £117m to £42m
- existing players got significant wage rises (Sharp, Norwood, McGoldrick, Baldock, Basham)
- new signings had more paid up front than we would probably have wanted: £49m of £71m plus £11m in contingent liabilities, most of which would probably have been due when we stayed up (McBurnie, Mousset called out but I would imagine you can add Freeman and Robinson to the list)
- we spent £7m on agents
- borrowing is standard practice (in our case, as with many others, from MacQuarie Bank) to cover working capital requirements between TV payments
- HRH put £21m in (goes against the standard narrative)
- we donated £3.4m to charities - more should be made of this!
Nah, just trying to help. Like whoring is copy-pasting a statement from a former manager
The general principle is that the biggest link is between wages and league position but it doesn’t guarantee it. We saw that in L1. We’ve seen it at the Sty.The stattos say that wages have the highest bearing on where you finish in the league pyramid and transfer fees have a much smaller bearing.
Therefore if anyone at the club had any sense they’d have signed players on higher wages to try and guarantee league position. Last year we overachieved with the lowest wage bill. As we’ve probably got the lowest wage bill this season we’ve finished where statistically we should have.
Just been and watched the full thing. It's definitely worthwhile and I'd recommend it to anyone else. You get a really good sense of what the accounts mean for the near future of the clubNot sure if serious but...
- £38m to buy the stadium, less than expected
- expect a loss in 20/21 with wages up significantly and revenue down £20-£30m (from £143m in 19/20)
- relegation reduces TV money from £117m to £42m
- existing players got significant wage rises (Sharp, Norwood, McGoldrick, Baldock, Basham)
- new signings had more paid up front than we would probably have wanted: £49m of £71m plus £11m in contingent liabilities, most of which would probably have been due when we stayed up (McBurnie, Mousset called out but I would imagine you can add Freeman and Robinson to the list)
- we spent £7m on agents
- borrowing is standard practice (in our case, as with many others, from MacQuarie Bank) to cover working capital requirements between TV payments
- HRH put £21m in (goes against the standard narrative)
- we donated £3.4m to charities - more should be made of this!
Can't wait for all the forum accountants to pull this to bits and claim it's all a load of bollocks even though they have literally no clue whatsoever about finance or accountancy because Bob off Twitter disputes "where moneh's gone".
Try that bloke from DC.... Just sayin...I hoped this was the return of our Darren but the lack of sex swing and gimp masks hanging up in the background, and that he didn't mention when we beat Bury 2-1 in 1988 and who scored for both teams means it wasn't.
Very good video, maybe the point about paying more upfront for players is what the Prince was alluding to when he said that he had to get McBurnie out of his own pocket.
The bit at the end is a very nice touch by the club and it's disappointing nothing has been made of it, but then you'd probably get a knuckle dragger on twitter saying it should have been spent on players.
Apparently the statistical link between league position and higher wages is over 90% in PL terms.The general principle is that the biggest link is between wages and league position but it doesn’t guarantee it. We saw that in L1. We’ve seen it at the Sty.
Whilst it may have given us a better chance of staying up, the consequences of going down would have been far more severe. We’d be stuck with players on high wages that we probably couldn’t shift and would be looking to sell anyone of value that we could to balance the books. Basically, the rewards could have been higher but the risk of damage if it went wrong would be much greater.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?