Champagneblade
Stop moaning and get on with it
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 15,800
- Reaction score
- 45,066
This just seems so obvious.I think Wilder is still working out what our identity actually is, which I don't really blame him for given our best 3 players were sold and he wasn't given a penny to replace them.
I imagine a kind of 4-3-3 is probably the way forward, with Donovan and BBD on the wings and a midfield of Peck, Arblaster and Phillips. I think it's about time we give the latter two a run of games to see if they're up to it, as I don't think these regular 20-minute sub appearances are really helping anyone anymore.
4-4-2 leaves us getting overrun in every single game.
I really don’t see the point in persisting with 2 midfield players because however long we need to adopt and improve if we start with 4-3-3 it will still be time well invested than persisting with 4-4-2.
The 2 midfielders we select won’t get quicker. They won’t be able to cover more ground. They wont be able to close down better and recover the ball once they’ve turned it over.
It HAS to be 3 in the middle.
This is where I disagree with Wilder. “I’d rather do one system well than three average” was the type of comment. Disagree. We’re not talking about changing from 4-3-3 to 1-0-9! We’re taking about 4-3-3 retaining a midfield 3 and moving to either a 5-3-2 or 5-3-1-1 and it just means bringing on either RND and moving McCallum to centre half or Baptiste to centre half. Then you either move BBD up top and Donovan subbed off (5-3-2) or the opposite with Donovan just off a striker (5-3-1-1); it’s not an outlandishly radical change at all; it’s one personnel change and pushing fullbacks a little further forward.
That’s the way forward for me. 4-4-2 out, 4-2-3-1 has gone too. The two obvious ones are clear as day.
Last edited:
