Jim Phipps on Facebook

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

WhiteHawk

Forum Sheep Herder
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
12,337
Reaction score
16,175
Location
Stocksbridge
He's just posted this to Facebook, thought those who don't have it might like to read.


I have upwards of 40 messages in my inbox, which this message is intended to address. I am sorry I cannot respond to all personally and I am sorry for the length of this missive.

Every Blade has his or her own view on the football so far this season. Some are patient. Some are not. Some teeter between hope and despair. And, frankly, given the inconsistency of the results, the diabolical nature of the competition in L1, the apparent weakness of the league this season ('it's there for the taking') and the fact that we have been in this league now for a fifth season (too say nothing of the environmental issues in the league such as the standard of officiating), the range of sentiments we are experiencing as a Blades family is all too understandable.

Personally, I think we -- the board, the management, the players, and the fans -- need to step it up, if we are going to get where we want to go this season: Automatic promotion. I am not blaming any one. I am just saying we all can do better.

In the spirit of taking responsibility for what I can take responsibility for on a personal level as your co-chairman, I thought I might take a minute to talk a little about what the board has done and is doing to improve matters.

I start by acknowledging that, we as a board are far from perfect. The board is, however, committed and continues to operate in a manner that allows the top football professionals we have at the Club (both on the touchline and in the front office) to make the core decisions about who wears the strip and how the football resources will be applied. Which positions do we need to strengthen? How quickly can we shrink the squad to a more rational, economical size, given the injury situation? What strength can we draw from our academy to serve the first team? Which players should be recruited and on what terms (loan, perm, price, etc.)? All such questions are left to our Technical Board (MD, Football Manager, FD, Academy Manager, etc.) to decide, provided they are within board approved budgets and other parameters.

That said, some of the current problems in the side (its size, for example) are byproducts of our trying as a board to be true to our approach, in circumstances where we allowed the Technical Board process to be thoroughly undermined by a gaffer, who was not interested in the process; hence, some of the excesses (recruiting in quantity, signing injured players, etc). We should have seen what was happening (the excesses, any way) and responded more quickly to address. Hindsight is 20:20. In appointing the new football manager, we specifically sought a gaffer who would help us re-establish a process that prevent the repetition of the same mistakes. I am very happy with the progress we have made on this particular and believe the fruits of the Technical Board process will show themselves over time, if we stick to the process.

On the football performance side, we have made a significant increase in the amount of communication between the board and the football management team. This has been very easy to accomplish owing to the open and communicative nature of the football management team. The amount of back and forth is healthy and the substance of the conversation is inspires confidence. For those who imagine that the gaffer's position is some how precarious or at risk, nothing could be further from the truth. Our confidence in Nigel Adkins is very high. We have the right man for the job. And the people he has brought with him are quality.

For those who have followed closely, you already know that, on the money front, HRH has, for his part, put in GBP 13 Million in the last 2.25 years, the most recent GBP 3 Million during the most recent close season. This capital injection has enabled the Club to do the things that enabled it to secure GBP 4 Million in cup winnings over the last two season (GBP 3 Million of which has been applied to first team football; and about GBP 1 million to Desso pitch at BDTBL and on new training pitches). The prince's investment has also allowed the Club to apply/allocate all (that's 100%) of the proceeds from player sales to first team football. In total, that's investment/re-investment of GBP 21 Million into the football club in a brief 2.25 year period. By L1 standards, that is a fairly substantial sum. (For those who imagine otherwise, the Club has not made a distribution of profits to owners, since we came in late Summer 2013, because the Club operates at a deficit year in and year out.)

During the months ahead, the owners plan to inject further monies into the club to ensure that the Club has every chance of achieving its goal of going up this season in the automatic positions. In all, investment/re-investment during the most recent three L1 season, including the current season, will top GBP 25 Million by season end.

We see Nigel Adkins and the team making progress. Perhaps the most important change so far is that we are playing every game to win. True, we are getting stung on the counter attack too frequently, and we're conceding goals too easily, but we are not setting ourselves up negatively for matches and the substitutions have consistently evidenced an intent to score. Are there issues still to be addressed? Yes. Do we have confidence that NA is the right person to address them? Absolutely.

At the board level, we love the Club. We back that up with substantial resources and an approach that leaves the footballing decisions to our very highly qualified, and carefully vetted front office and touchline professionals. We all want better performances and better results and they will come. Rome, however, wasn't built in a day. We see the problems. The gaffer sees what needs doing. We will get there.

- What do you think the board needs to do better to help the Club win promotion?
- What do you think management needs to do better to help the Club win promotion?
- What do you think the players need to do better to help the Club win promotion?
- What do you think the supporters can do better to help the Club win promotion?

Surely, we can all stretch a bit more to realise our shared goal. Let's talk to and about each other in a way that assumes that we all want the same thing and desire to do what's necessary to get there. We do not have to agree on everything, but we can safely assume we are in a common cause and talk to each other as friends, rather than as adversaries. Let's get united and be a strength to each other.

UP THE MIGHTY BLADES!
 

So in other words it costs the prince 25 million pounds to keep the club alive and ensure that money raised from.cup runs and player sales can be partially reinvested in the first team
 
He makes a good number of fair points there. We really need to ship out some of the shit and sign some competent defenders and a goalkeeper though. They're a liability at times. If we sell any of our top performers in January though we will have no chance
 
He makes a good number of fair points there. We really need to ship out some of the shit and sign some competent defenders and a goalkeeper though. They're a liability at times. If we sell any of our top performers in January though we will have no chance
Isnt that basically what hes saying though
That even with the investment we cant afford to bring anyone in without money generated by player sales and cup runs
 
He makes a good number of fair points there. We really need to ship out some of the shit and sign some competent defenders and a goalkeeper though. They're a liability at times. If we sell any of our top performers in January though we will have no chance


He does. Particularly about Clough.

Couldn't resist bigging the numbers up about "reinvesting" FC income though. I'd expect that to be exactly what any club aiming for promotion would do.
 
He's just posted this to Facebook, thought those who don't have it might like to read.


I have upwards of 40 messages in my inbox, which this message is intended to address. I am sorry I cannot respond to all personally and I am sorry for the length of this missive.

Every Blade has his or her own view on the football so far this season. Some are patient. Some are not. Some teeter between hope and despair. And, frankly, given the inconsistency of the results, the diabolical nature of the competition in L1, the apparent weakness of the league this season ('it's there for the taking') and the fact that we have been in this league now for a fifth season (too say nothing of the environmental issues in the league such as the standard of officiating), the range of sentiments we are experiencing as a Blades family is all too understandable.

Personally, I think we -- the board, the management, the players, and the fans -- need to step it up, if we are going to get where we want to go this season: Automatic promotion. I am not blaming any one. I am just saying we all can do better.

In the spirit of taking responsibility for what I can take responsibility for on a personal level as your co-chairman, I thought I might take a minute to talk a little about what the board has done and is doing to improve matters.

I start by acknowledging that, we as a board are far from perfect. The board is, however, committed and continues to operate in a manner that allows the top football professionals we have at the Club (both on the touchline and in the front office) to make the core decisions about who wears the strip and how the football resources will be applied. Which positions do we need to strengthen? How quickly can we shrink the squad to a more rational, economical size, given the injury situation? What strength can we draw from our academy to serve the first team? Which players should be recruited and on what terms (loan, perm, price, etc.)? All such questions are left to our Technical Board (MD, Football Manager, FD, Academy Manager, etc.) to decide, provided they are within board approved budgets and other parameters.

That said, some of the current problems in the side (its size, for example) are byproducts of our trying as a board to be true to our approach, in circumstances where we allowed the Technical Board process to be thoroughly undermined by a gaffer, who was not interested in the process; hence, some of the excesses (recruiting in quantity, signing injured players, etc). We should have seen what was happening (the excesses, any way) and responded more quickly to address. Hindsight is 20:20. In appointing the new football manager, we specifically sought a gaffer who would help us re-establish a process that prevent the repetition of the same mistakes. I am very happy with the progress we have made on this particular and believe the fruits of the Technical Board process will show themselves over time, if we stick to the process.

On the football performance side, we have made a significant increase in the amount of communication between the board and the football management team. This has been very easy to accomplish owing to the open and communicative nature of the football management team. The amount of back and forth is healthy and the substance of the conversation is inspires confidence. For those who imagine that the gaffer's position is some how precarious or at risk, nothing could be further from the truth. Our confidence in Nigel Adkins is very high. We have the right man for the job. And the people he has brought with him are quality.

For those who have followed closely, you already know that, on the money front, HRH has, for his part, put in GBP 13 Million in the last 2.25 years, the most recent GBP 3 Million during the most recent close season. This capital injection has enabled the Club to do the things that enabled it to secure GBP 4 Million in cup winnings over the last two season (GBP 3 Million of which has been applied to first team football; and about GBP 1 million to Desso pitch at BDTBL and on new training pitches). The prince's investment has also allowed the Club to apply/allocate all (that's 100%) of the proceeds from player sales to first team football. In total, that's investment/re-investment of GBP 21 Million into the football club in a brief 2.25 year period. By L1 standards, that is a fairly substantial sum. (For those who imagine otherwise, the Club has not made a distribution of profits to owners, since we came in late Summer 2013, because the Club operates at a deficit year in and year out.)

During the months ahead, the owners plan to inject further monies into the club to ensure that the Club has every chance of achieving its goal of going up this season in the automatic positions. In all, investment/re-investment during the most recent three L1 season, including the current season, will top GBP 25 Million by season end.

We see Nigel Adkins and the team making progress. Perhaps the most important change so far is that we are playing every game to win. True, we are getting stung on the counter attack too frequently, and we're conceding goals too easily, but we are not setting ourselves up negatively for matches and the substitutions have consistently evidenced an intent to score. Are there issues still to be addressed? Yes. Do we have confidence that NA is the right person to address them? Absolutely.

At the board level, we love the Club. We back that up with substantial resources and an approach that leaves the footballing decisions to our very highly qualified, and carefully vetted front office and touchline professionals. We all want better performances and better results and they will come. Rome, however, wasn't built in a day. We see the problems. The gaffer sees what needs doing. We will get there.

- What do you think the board needs to do better to help the Club win promotion?
- What do you think management needs to do better to help the Club win promotion?
- What do you think the players need to do better to help the Club win promotion?
- What do you think the supporters can do better to help the Club win promotion?

Surely, we can all stretch a bit more to realise our shared goal. Let's talk to and about each other in a way that assumes that we all want the same thing and desire to do what's necessary to get there. We do not have to agree on everything, but we can safely assume we are in a common cause and talk to each other as friends, rather than as adversaries. Let's get united and be a strength to each other.

UP THE MIGHTY BLADES!

I think that's extraordinarily good.
 
This is exactly the kind of post I don't think the Co-Chairman should be making on social media.

Unfortunately by trying to be transparent as possible it opens him up to more criticism, snide comments, and in a lot of cases abuse that is unwarranted just because of the media he's using to convey this information.
 

Isnt that basically what hes saying though
That even with the investment we cant afford to bring anyone in without money generated by player sales and cup runs


I thought he was just inflating the investment by saying it had gone been left in the FC rather than taken out by the owners.
Judging by that statement and the 2014 accounts, HRH had put £5 million in since June 2014.
 
- What do you think the board needs to do better to help the Club win promotion?

Support Adkins heavily in the JTW.

- What do you think management needs to do better to help the Club win promotion?

Be backed by the board in the JTW.

- What do you think the players need to do better to help the Club win promotion?

Score goals and keep clean sheets.

- What do you think the supporters can do better to help the Club win promotion?


Fuck off, Jim, we have been through a heck of a lot and are still attending in mass numbers for the lads.
 
That's quite a lot of specific detail provided that should answer quite a lot of questions on the investment side of things, but also on operations at the club.

I say *should*, but I know that in the next few days I'll read something on here about how the owners aren't investing enough, how Adkins isn't being backed, etc etc.
 
This is exactly the kind of post I don't think the Co-Chairman should be making on social media.

Unfortunately by trying to be transparent as possible it opens him up to more criticism, snide comments, and in a lot of cases abuse that is unwarranted just because of the media he's using to convey this information.

Absolutely.

I can't believe how good that communication is. Let's see if anyone has anything positive to suggest.

I'm between computers and can't get on fb easily atm which is a real shame bc I'd've liked to try to contribute.
 
- What do you think the board needs to do better to help the Club win promotion?

Support Adkins heavily in the JTW.

- What do you think management needs to do better to help the Club win promotion?

Be backed by the board in the JTW.

- What do you think the players need to do better to help the Club win promotion?

Score goals and keep clean sheets.

- What do you think the supporters can do better to help the Club win promotion?

Fuck off, Jim, we have been through a heck of a lot and are still attending in mass numbers for the lads.

Really? That's your response: "Fuck off Jim."
 
That's quite a lot of specific detail provided that should answer quite a lot of questions on the investment side of things, but also on operations at the club.

I say *should*, but I know that in the next few days I'll read something on here about how the owners aren't investing enough, how Adkins isn't being backed, etc etc.

You can already read: "Fuck off Jim". It only takes a few seconds. Why wait a few days?
 
That said, some of the current problems in the side (its size, for example) are byproducts of our trying as a board to be true to our approach, in circumstances where we allowed the Technical Board process to be thoroughly undermined by a gaffer, who was not interested in the process; hence, some of the excesses (recruiting in quantity, signing injured players, etc). We should have seen what was happening (the excesses, any way) and responded more quickly to address. Hindsight is 20:20. In appointing the new football manager, we specifically sought a gaffer who would help us re-establish a process that prevent the repetition of the same mistakes.

That's probably as near to admitting they got it wrong as we will get
 
That said, some of the current problems in the side (its size, for example) are byproducts of our trying as a board to be true to our approach, in circumstances where we allowed the Technical Board process to be thoroughly undermined by a gaffer, who was not interested in the process; hence, some of the excesses (recruiting in quantity, signing injured players, etc). We should have seen what was happening (the excesses, any way) and responded more quickly to address. Hindsight is 20:20. In appointing the new football manager, we specifically sought a gaffer who would help us re-establish a process that prevent the repetition of the same mistakes.

That's probably as near to admitting they got it wrong as we will get

A very damning summary of Clough and his reign - took me by surprise and very candid of Jim to admit that.
 
That said, some of the current problems in the side (its size, for example) are byproducts of our trying as a board to be true to our approach, in circumstances where we allowed the Technical Board process to be thoroughly undermined by a gaffer, who was not interested in the process; hence, some of the excesses (recruiting in quantity, signing injured players, etc). We should have seen what was happening (the excesses, any way) and responded more quickly to address. Hindsight is 20:20. In appointing the new football manager, we specifically sought a gaffer who would help us re-establish a process that prevent the repetition of the same mistakes.

That's probably as near to admitting they got it wrong as we will get


It's quite clear he's admitting they got it wrong. He refers to allowing it and not putting a stop to it. It's not ambiguous in any way.
 

That said, some of the current problems in the side (its size, for example) are byproducts of our trying as a board to be true to our approach, in circumstances where we allowed the Technical Board process to be thoroughly undermined by a gaffer, who was not interested in the process; hence, some of the excesses (recruiting in quantity, signing injured players, etc). We should have seen what was happening (the excesses, any way) and responded more quickly to address. Hindsight is 20:20. In appointing the new football manager, we specifically sought a gaffer who would help us re-establish a process that prevent the repetition of the same mistakes.

That's probably as near to admitting they got it wrong as we will get

Was Clough not aware of the process in the first place? Frankly if the people we signed last season were signed because Clough put his foot down and insisted we get them, against the views of the Technical Board, I'm amazed he stayed in the job as long as he did.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom