Agree with brownie on Murphy.
Think there is a lot of rubbish spoke about players and best positions. Too many use this an excuse. If he was so good he would be able to adapt. At the end of the day beating men, getting shots in, crosses, linking with players would be similiar whether wide or up top. He had a few games up top and I felt he was no better there. Maybe he might improve slightly but cant see all of a sudden him gaining qualities he does not simply have as he is moved 10-15 yards inside and more central?
He came with a big reputation from the SPL (admittedly crap league) but he has been a major disappointment. Also some have said its hard for him in a dysfunctional team but surely if he was that stand out; he would do exactly that e 'stand out'.Too many players in our side seem to be blaming everyone but themselves (McDonald cant play as others are poor, Kitson has noone to link with, Forte has no balls played to hi, the fans are on the backs etc, etc - I am sick of their excuses). They all as individuals and a team need to man up.
He has looked very ordinary at best. He is not that fast, not particularly skilful, his control is quite poor and he is even weaker than Flynn. More than all that he has not looked like he wants to fight and dig in when we have struggled and has disapeared in many games and often I have forgot he is playing in the second half of games until inevitably he is taken off.
Seen nothing to suggest he wont ever be more than a lower league player in England (which he is!). An injection of increased effort might help but his overall football talents have mostly been a real disappoinment. I think even Flynn might offer more than him and as others know I aint his biggest fan.