Interest in Blades players

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Bucksblade

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
167
Reaction score
408
i keep reading journos articles on interest in various players but as the club is subject to sale ratification is it safe to assume there can be no sales or purchases this month or until the the owners due diligence is completed.
Hecky has his hands tied and his comments clearly indicate contract extensions cannot be agreed. Therefore a convenient reposte to the vulture agents for big clubs thinking we could sell for big money Ndiaye or if the board lose their bottle and derail almost guaranteed promotion.
 



I’m probably wrong, but I guess the owner chooses not to make any buys regardless of EFL ratification?

In reality, the owner can buy or sell as many players as he chooses should opportunities arise, unless of course there’s an agreement in place with any potential new owner
 
You would think the prospective owner and existing owner will have an agreement in place about what can and can't be done.

Say the new owner has bid £130m for the club, at least £30m of that fee includes the value of a couple of key players, if the Prince sold one of the clubs major assets, the new owner wouldn't be getting what he'd agreed to buy.

I can't imagine any sales, if there are it would be a really bad sign as I think the new owners would have agreed it, not exactly the show of intention we're hoping for as fans
 
Players are part of the fixture and fitting’s. I’m guessing these assets would be factored into the price of the club.
 
You would think the prospective owner and existing owner will have an agreement in place about what can and can't be done.

Say the new owner has bid £130m for the club, at least £30m of that fee includes the value of a couple of key players, if the Prince sold one of the clubs major assets, the new owner wouldn't be getting what he'd agreed to buy.

I can't imagine any sales, if there are it would be a really bad sign as I think the new owners would have agreed it, not exactly the show of intention we're hoping for as fans

That’s as I see it .

I can’t believe that any potential new owner would be daft enough to enter into an agreement whereby when it was finalised , it was not what he had agreed to buy in that it had been stripped of one or more of it’s major assets .
 
I’m probably wrong, but I guess the owner chooses not to make any buys regardless of EFL ratification?

In reality, the owner can buy or sell as many players as he chooses should opportunities arise, unless of course there’s an agreement in place with any potential new owner
Unless the player being sold by the owner tells them to fuck off, “I’ve got a contract until whenever and I’m staying put.”
Which would be nice.
 
i keep reading journos articles on interest in various players but as the club is subject to sale ratification is it safe to assume there can be no sales or purchases this month or until the the owners due diligence is completed.
Hecky has his hands tied and his comments clearly indicate contract extensions cannot be agreed. Therefore a convenient reposte to the vulture agents for big clubs thinking we could sell for big money Ndiaye or if the board lose their bottle and derail almost guaranteed promotion.
Quick repost about refusing sales means nothing and would be a lie.
Nothing has changed with United whilst the Prince has been in charge,
he's explained time and time again that we don't need to sell anyone and he'll do everything he can to achieve promotion.
However he's explained that every player has a valuation and we wont sell unless clubs meet it, hence why Berge is still here.

Every player at every club can be sold, if Spurs receive a 180 million bid for Kane, he's gone.
If any club offers 50 million for N'Diaye he's gone too, however only if we have adequate replacements lined up.
So I'm not the slightest but worried.
 
Quick repost about refusing sales means nothing and would be a lie.
Nothing has changed with United whilst the Prince has been in charge,
he's explained time and time again that we don't need to sell anyone and he'll do everything he can to achieve promotion.
However he's explained that every player has a valuation and we wont sell unless clubs meet it, hence why Berge is still here.

Every player at every club can be sold, if Spurs receive a 180 million bid for Kane, he's gone.
If any club offers 50 million for N'Diaye he's gone too, however only if we have adequate replacements lined up.
So I'm not the slightest but worried.

I agree that every player has a price but I’m hoping any prospective new owner has an agreement with the Prince that no assets to be sold whilst deal goes through

Regards Ndiaye, if he did get sold for big money, I’m not sure we’d get an adequate replacement for him, especially trying to find one in Jan
 
Is the takeover a good thing to minimise external interest? No in's and no outs?
One fairly obvious spin off from this is the return of Will Osula. Banned for 3 games and apparently cup tied, he returns to first team training at the Lane from his loan club.
PH is well aware that strikers are needed to fill gaps in the squad. He is not in a position to buy, or loan anyone because we don’t have the money and the Khadra issue is dragging on.

The managers instincts are proved correct when Jebbinson scores away at Millwall in the cup. If that’s not enough, PH knows McBurnie is cracked for a month at least, and this is the perfect time to bring Osula back to keep Jebbinson on his toes. I was the one who said we didn’t need another striker and we couldn’t afford one. WTF do I know, but suddenly we have two ‘new’ development strikers, just when we need them. (I think Osula will develop more quickly than Jebbinson).

They are our players, cost nothing extra for the club, and they could easily be capable of getting us over the line, especially when we get back to two games a week. The bonus is, they both buy into the squad ethos at the Lane, and they fit the development club mantra perfectly. No need to break in another striker from external sources.
 
Any material transfer would have to be agreed by the potential new owners as well I believe.

Example
  • Ndiaye for £1m new owners would be annoyed at accepting
  • Ndiaye for £100m new owners would be annoyed at Prince for rejecting
  • Ndiaye for £25/30m (about par) is a tougher judgement call, but it wouldn't be Prince's decision alone. If Prince did sell, the buying party could claim there'd been a shift in value of the club, and renegotiations may have to restart.

In a nutshell, there's a reason why in Football Manager you are under a transfer embargo once a takeover bid emerges!
 
Players are part of the fixture and fitting’s. I’m guessing these assets would be factored into the price of the club.
Accounting pedantry but they're not. The players are employees, their registrations are treated as intangible assets valued at the amortised value* at the point of reporting. Anything paid for the club above the value of its assets less its liabilities (ie more than the value of its equity), including increases based on a belief that the squad is worth more than its book value, is treated as goodwill.

*transfer fee spread over the length of the contract. Most valuable currently will be Rhian Brewster at somewhere around £9m, followed by Berge at around £7m then McBurnie and Ahmedhodzic at around £2.25m.
 
Accounting pedantry but they're not. The players are employees, their registrations are treated as intangible assets valued at the amortised value* at the point of reporting. Anything paid for the club above the value of its assets less its liabilities (ie more than the value of its equity), including increases based on a belief that the squad is worth more than its book value, is treated as goodwill.

*transfer fee spread over the length of the contract. Most valuable currently will be Rhian Brewster at somewhere around £9m, followed by Berge at around £7m then McBurnie and Ahmedhodzic at around £2.25m.
Accounting pedantry aside, I’d guess there would be nothing to prevent the offer to include a clause that stipulates that, once it has been accepted, during the period of ratification by the EFL no players can be sold without the consent of the purchaser and the purchaser reserves the right to reduce the sale price should they grant consent.
 
I agree that every player has a price but I’m hoping any prospective new owner has an agreement with the Prince that no assets to be sold whilst deal goes through

Regards Ndiaye, if he did get sold for big money, I’m not sure we’d get an adequate replacement for him, especially trying to find one in Jan
It would be impossible to get an adequate replacement for Ndiaye in January.
 



Accounting pedantry aside, I’d guess there would be nothing to prevent the offer to include a clause that stipulates that, once it has been accepted, during the period of ratification by the EFL no players can be sold without the consent of the purchaser and the purchaser reserves the right to reduce the sale price should they grant consent.
Definately. Also the player being an asset at his sale value is true, but in the current situation I think there is more to it.
I am guessing the new buyer is buying on a gamble, Prince on a kind of cash-out.
eg. SUFC in Championship worth £50m , in Prem worth £100m , buyer offers £75m now.
(figures are just made up to paint the scenario).
So sales will be a big no-no .
 
From Sky Transfer Centre

West Ham considering swoop for Senegal international
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom