Incoming? Iliman

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Just some thing for people to think about. Would you allow mcatee to go back to Man City if it meant we signed illiman permanently? It would also free up a loan spot
 
Edwards of Nazareth said:
Just some thing for people to think about. Would you allow mcatee to go back to Man City if it meant we signed illiman permanently? It would also free up a loan spot
Click to expand...
I personally can't see Ndiaye ever signing with us again unless things seriously don't work out for him elsewhere whilst he's young. He chose Marseille over us at the end of a window, that's not to say his heart would never be here, but there's not a chance he'd sign a long term deal with us anytime soon. If the choice was to sign Macca permanently in the summer rather than loan Illy now and have them together, I know what I'd choose.
 
O.M. need to cut costs. Championsleague failure meens adjusting. Sarr not been hitting the roof either. More hope than rumour,but one can always hope of a returnloan. Sarr anyone?
 
To be fair it would be typical sheff utd fashion.

We lose our most talented forward thinking player in a generation to Marseille. Even though the player themselves without an ultimatum from Marseille (Their hometown club). He would have stayed and signed a new deal.

Only for 6 months later Marseille need to cut their losses due to overspending and we can't afford to re sign him.

He inevitably goes to another club in the PL to ensure their safety.

When you read that above, it's hard to see how it won't happen in the next 3 weeks!

That is true blades fashion, something we can't actually control conspiring against us haha..
 

Will we have been paid the full amount for illy or will it have been 20 mill over a period of years . If that's the case cant we just offer them the fees that have been paid ,Not sure how transfers are settled
 
tazzy said:
Will we have been paid the full amount for illy or will it have been 20 mill over a period of years . If that's the case cant we just offer them the fees that have been paid ,Not sure how transfers are settled
Click to expand...

It's purely an accounting activity. Transfers out are received in x instalments based on certain criteria being met. Similarly to transfers in are paid in y instalments.

So our finance gurus will have p&l, balance sheets, deprecation and amortisation etc of all outgoings, incomings and adjust accordingly. In a nutshell id assume payments for Hamer for example may correlate to income for N'diaye. Unless we can afford a huge discrepancy (which I doubt) it's not feasible to buy ndiaye back (thus removing future transfer instalments) against future transfer payments. Unless we sell someone 🤔🙃🤪
 
Not sure Everton can sign anyone, (permanently that is) without possible FFP sanctions....they are certainly treading a fine line...
 
Edwards of Nazareth said:
Just some thing for people to think about. Would you allow mcatee to go back to Man City if it meant we signed illiman permanently? It would also free up a loan spot
Click to expand...
Don't need to free up a loan spot
wakefieldblade said:
Never going to happen, move on…
Click to expand...
Unless it does
CPB said:
To be fair it would be typical sheff utd fashion.

We lose our most talented forward thinking player in a generation to Marseille. Even though the player themselves without an ultimatum from Marseille (Their hometown club). He would have stayed and signed a new deal.

Only for 6 months later Marseille need to cut their losses due to overspending and we can't afford to re sign him.

He inevitably goes to another club in the PL to ensure their safety.

When you read that above, it's hard to see how it won't happen in the next 3 weeks!

That is true blades fashion, something we can't actually control conspiring against us haha..
Click to expand...
Tell me you're a fanny without telling me ..
 
Frank the tank said:
Don't need to free up a loan spot

Unless it does

Tell me you're a fanny without telling me ..
Click to expand...
You are correct no need to free up a loan spot if loaned. As it's from abroad.

I struggle to see it happening but would be v.pleased if it did.

Lastly think what you want of me but you know it be true that it would be very bladey for him to sign for a rival (ish) side only 6 months after departure to help them. When he was very close to staying in the first place.
 
Melbourne Blade said:
It's purely an accounting activity. Transfers out are received in x instalments based on certain criteria being met. Similarly to transfers in are paid in y instalments.

So our finance gurus will have p&l, balance sheets, deprecation and amortisation etc of all outgoings, incomings and adjust accordingly. In a nutshell id assume payments for Hamer for example may correlate to income for N'diaye. Unless we can afford a huge discrepancy (which I doubt) it's not feasible to buy ndiaye back (thus removing future transfer instalments) against future transfer payments. Unless we sell someone 🤔🙃🤪
Click to expand...
Thanks for clearing that up.😳
 
CPB said:
You are correct no need to free up a loan spot if loaned. As it's from abroad.

I struggle to see it happening but would be v.pleased if it did.

Lastly think what you want of me but you know it be true that it would be very bladey for him to sign for a rival (ish) side only 6 months after departure to help them. When he was very close to staying in the first place.
Click to expand...
Name another occasion that has happened
 
CPB said:
To be fair it would be typical sheff utd fashion.

We lose our most talented forward thinking player in a generation to Marseille. Even though the player themselves without an ultimatum from Marseille (Their hometown club). He would have stayed and signed a new deal.

Only for 6 months later Marseille need to cut their losses due to overspending and we can't afford to re sign him.

He inevitably goes to another club in the PL to ensure their safety.

When you read that above, it's hard to see how it won't happen in the next 3 weeks!

That is true blades fashion, something we can't actually control conspiring against us haha..
Click to expand...

The Blades Way
 
Melbourne Blade said:
It's purely an accounting activity. Transfers out are received in x instalments based on certain criteria being met. Similarly to transfers in are paid in y instalments.

So our finance gurus will have p&l, balance sheets, deprecation and amortisation etc of all outgoings, incomings and adjust accordingly. In a nutshell id assume payments for Hamer for example may correlate to income for N'diaye. Unless we can afford a huge discrepancy (which I doubt) it's not feasible to buy ndiaye back (thus removing future transfer instalments) against future transfer payments. Unless we sell someone 🤔🙃🤪
Click to expand...
Theoretically correct but I'd imagine the Hamer payments are aligned to the Berge payments as those fees are more aligned.
 
I’m not ITK but I’ve been told we are monitoring the situation closely.
 
If Illi did go out on loan then how many games would that club get him for - around 14 games? A club could do a lot with him in their side for that amount of time.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Pandev
McBurnie and Jebbo future
6 7 8
Replies
217
Views
15K
bonobo
B
B
Danny Ward
4 5 6
Replies
150
Views
17K
gaffablade
gaffablade
tommy
Talles Magno
Replies
10
Views
3K
Snowflake
S
ChipButtyBlade
Incoming? Zian Flemming
Replies
13
Views
3K
Chengdu Blade
Chengdu Blade
JOEYDEE
Player Suggestion Millenic Alli
Replies
1
Views
968
NateDogg
N

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom