HillmortonBlade
With the luck of the Irish
Does that change anyone's view on whether he should go (or indeed stay)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Does that change anyone's view on whether he should go (or indeed stay)?
Does that change anyone's view on whether he should go (or indeed stay)?
And no poll? You tease.Does that change anyone's view on whether he should go (or indeed stay)?
I dont think so.
He did after all bring in woolford and Hammond.
Would you trust him?
Soooooper, super Chris...Just preparing the ground for Chrissy Wilder to come in & start recruiting...
...................and Sharp and Baptise
NO no no Yes Blade! We are just looking for bad people Adkins has brought in!
Is all based on assumption that he realises he should lose 90% of these losers. I assumed he knew we needed two centre halves and a keeper and instead he started long against Gillingham with McEvely as captain. That decision alone should have seen him sacked at half time.
Does that change anyone's view on whether he should go (or indeed stay)?
He is in quite a unique position now in that he actually has a chance to remove a large number of over paid under performing players and bring in his own.If he replaces them with the likes of Sharp and Baptiste: Yey, Adkins in!
If he replaces them with the likes of Woolford and Sammom: Boo, on yer bike!
He is in quite a unique position now in that he actually has a chance to remove a large number of over paid under performing players and bring in his own.
In the past many managers have been stuck with these players on long contracts earning good and going no where because it was only going to be down for them.
Get it right and he will be ok, get it wrong and he might struggle to ever get another managers job. It's sort of acceptable to say, well yeah at Reading and SUFC I was left with poor players, but have the opportunity to change most of them and either not take it or replace them with equally poor players and then stuggle again and he has no such excuse.
True, but if that is the case then I'm sure he'll let us know. Not much is his fault it seems....or be told to replace them with the U21's and freebie's...hopefully, he's got a bit of cash and will have scouted in L2/L1/non league...
UTB!
True, but if that is the case then I'm sure he'll let us know. Not much is his fault it seems.
Personally I'd prefer good young players from leagues 1 & 2 who want to play for us rather older players from above. It's those sort of signings that have got us in this mess.
It's reliant on Adkins getting rid of most the squad.
A new manager could do something daft like give them one year extensions.
Man in the pub correct.'Man in pub' ee say no contract offered to Hammond.
We shall see...
McCabe was going nuts about Hammond's 'performance' at half time on Sunday - can't imagine even if Adkins wanted to he'd sanction his signing permanently.Man in the pub correct.
noDoes that change anyone's view on whether he should go (or indeed stay)?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?