I was there the day......

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

It's OK to knock any player any day but not to recognise that a player has good days just to keep to the script is wrong.
 

pinchy mate.. i don't buy it either. hang in there.. montys wonder goal was a deflected shot .. based on the the number he's had over the last two million years the sheer laws of probability state he was bound to get one on target sooner or later ie at some point it becomes as difficult to hit a shot for a throw in than it is to get one on target..
he runs around a lot blah blah blah but he isn't a footballer.. don't even start me on quinn.. there are three players at the lane who i don't rate.. monty, quinn and hendo. they are always in the team and are the few players we always retain. they have zero skill yet 'work hard' .. i'm fucking fed up of useless players who give the ball away and work hard.. it is no good working hard if you have no talent the talent is a pre requisite to the working hard..
i'm ranting .. sorry.

>I'd also ban blue boots to reinforce what it is to play for The Blades.
yay.. vote grumpy for president :-) .. i remember when lee martin turned up in blue boots.. blue fucking boots.. i was livid.
 
>It's like me giving you an in-depth assessment of say, the crucifixion of Jesus
well i was there mate.. its all hype..nowt to write home about.. i saw the pistols at doncaster and nirvana at the duchess in leeds and anthrax/metallica at the city hall .. ok i was lying about the first two
 
.... Harper had his socks pulled up!!!!!!

:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

Up above the thread starters post - quite funny and light hearted i thought

He did cover more than his customary 6-yards for once!

Again above' an honest asessment of the player we are talking about in the thread from someone at the game.

OK to knock Harper but not Monty?

There is more to football than running around a lot. Ask Sean O' Driscoll.

Above a statement from someone who was not there trying to compare/ bring in to the debate another much talked about player, who aparantly had another cracking display(1st half aside for all).

Now Pinchy you seem obsessed in trying to defend the Mr Ploddy who had a good game today covering more ground than he has for a long time. Perhaps someone has re established the connections properly and the flapping arm energy now goes in to his legs.
So Mr Ploddy at Reading had a good career but that is past glory. Your parochial hero however is not a patch on TC. No thought of hoping he might return to the sort of form that Mr Ploddy could never aspire to. So if by some freek of nature TCs legs rebuild, then out of the 25000 who regulary attend only 1 would be obsessed enough to pick Harper- sorry thats mr Ploddy over TC. But as neither of these players are able to capture past glories. I don't see the harm in having a little fun with what Keenzy openned with and likewise with the fun posts after Monty's goal on Tuesday.
LIGHTEN UP, if we are able to get monty and harper to give you a kiss will that help?
 
>What year was that? Was it the "Damage Inc" tour
umm master of puppets OTOMH .. i think it was 1986.. i'll look it up in my 'list of gigs i've been to ' thingy :-)
 
I'm serious about banning blue boots but the real sad thing is:

There has been that many fuckers thru' the revolving door on the players entrance that I couldn't have named Lee Martin.
 
Godwin's Law on page 2....!!!!!

Explain please, I aint that clever?


Now this could get complicated but, as i understand it, I should be careful and consider whether i should use any reference to Hitler or the Nazi's because of possible overuse in a humourous fasion or knee jerk input could possibly add to the devaluation of the horrors committed?
But through this potential overuse being pointed out this in itself could be wrong because it has been pointed out? (hyperbole).
 
Now this could get complicated but, as i understand it, I should be careful and consider whether i should use any reference to Hitler or the Nazi's because of possible overuse in a humourous fasion or knee jerk input could possibly add to the devaluation of the horrors committed?
But through this potential overuse being pointed out this in itself could be wrong because it has been pointed out? (hyperbole).

er..................................yes!
 
Godwin's Law on page 2....!!!!!


Now this could get complicated but, as i understand it, I should be careful and consider whether i should use any reference to Hitler or the Nazi's because of possible overuse in a humourous fasion or knee jerk input could possibly add to the devaluation of the horrors committed?
But through this potential overuse being pointed out this in itself could be wrong because it has been pointed out? (hyperbole).

er..................................yes!

After all that what your really saying is that we should blame Pinchy?
But he's run off with his ball coz he saw Monty coming and he will only play with Harper. TC's not allowed either:D
 

>Explain please, I aint that clever
it basically means the word nazi has become a perjorative word.. hence bringing up said politico's is as good as insulting someone
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom