CONFIRMED Hamza Choudhury joins on loan with option to buy

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


For now….yes….also tried and tested at PL level. He should excel at Championship level.

I suppose the only thing about Charles is he’s young, athletic and has potential for the future but he’s more of a risk regards this season.

Maybe we'll concentrate in getting the job done this season, and then if we still like SC's potential, we might revisit it again in 5 months.
 
Noise from the terrace is he’s having medical Saturday morning
Sky said he was supposed to be at the game tonight. But didn’t show him.

The deal was almost done and dare I say, was due to be announced weds… but other factors got in the way. A bit of fannying about, by all accounts.

It’s seemingly turned in our favour, deal wise and it doesn’t surprise me that the noise is saying that 😂
 
Could have done with the lad last night. It might have gone some way to giving us a midfield.
I’d said this in the Shea Charles thread, that in the short term exploring the Charles v Choudhury option will have cost us for hull, but didn’t expect such a fuck up by not having a new signing in
 
Sky said he was supposed to be at the game tonight. But didn’t show him.

The deal was almost done and dare I say, was due to be announced weds… but other factors got in the way. A bit of fannying about, by all accounts.

It’s seemingly turned in our favour, deal wise and it doesn’t surprise me that the noise is saying that 😂
Have you recently befriended someone at SUFC.
You've became all ITK all of a sudden
 

Have you recently befriended someone at SUFC.
You've became all ITK all of a sudden

He's handling COHs Swiss bank accounts and can see when they are withdrawing money for a big splurge. 😁

Hasn't Swiss mentioned that he is friendly with a member of the consortium who is Sheffield based?
 
He's handling COHs Swiss bank accounts and can see when they are withdrawing money for a big splurge. 😁

Hasn't Swiss mentioned that he is friendly with a member of the consortium who is Sheffield based?
No im not friends with a member of the consortium to my knowledge
 
The thing with giving Peck a break is very wise, but hasn't Chowdhury been regarded as the best right back Leicester have by the fans themselves......
Unless of course he's a backup to Kenny but I got the impression that Chaudhry was doing excelling at right back so shouldn't we be looking for one probably two other midfielders - last night showed us just how lacking in depth we are in midfield with Davis/ blaster/ Gus/Souza missing
 
The thing with giving Peck a break is very wise, but hasn't Chowdhury been regarded as the best right back Leicester have by the fans themselves......
Unless of course he's a backup to Kenny but I got the impression that Chaudhry was doing excelling at right back so shouldn't we be looking for one probably two other midfielders - last night showed us just how lacking in depth we are in midfield with Davis/ blaster/ Gus/Souza missing

Choudhury is a defensive midfielder.
He's filled in on occasion at right back, but that's not his position. Wilder's bringing him in to play midfield, he's used words to the effect of "I want somebody in who gives us a lot of energy in the middle of the park and gets stuck in." That's Choudhury.
 
Could have done with the lad last night. It might have gone some way to giving us a midfield.
I hope he didn’t watch that last night,he would have second thoughts,we are bypassing midfield far too often and going back to the poor standard from last season. There is no doubt about it,we are regressing quickly,yes i know bodies have been missing but the style is poor and predictable. Square pegs in round holes again,Peck on wide right ? Burrows midfield? Brooks and O hare didn’t know where they were playing ? Question marks returning.
 
The thing with giving Peck a break is very wise, but hasn't Chowdhury been regarded as the best right back Leicester have by the fans themselves......
Unless of course he's a backup to Kenny but I got the impression that Chaudhry was doing excelling at right back so shouldn't we be looking for one probably two other midfielders - last night showed us just how lacking in depth we are in midfield with Davis/ blaster/ Gus/Souza missing
Nothing wrong with Peck last night apart from being shunted onto wide right.when he got the ball,no one showed or made space so he travelled 10 yards and had no options,he was fine until we had changes then no one knew where they were playing,what a cock up it was.
 
Nothing wrong with Peck last night apart from being shunted onto wide right.when he got the ball,no one showed or made space so he travelled 10 yards and had no options,he was fine until we had changes then no one knew where they were playing,what a cock up it was.
I really love Peck - I think he has it all but he needs to be coached to move the ball , and himself , forwards much much more . He loses his effect by tippy tippy passing sidewards and backwards.
 
I hope he didn’t watch that last night,he would have second thoughts,we are bypassing midfield far too often and going back to the poor standard from last season. There is no doubt about it,we are regressing quickly,yes i know bodies have been missing but the style is poor and predictable. Square pegs in round holes again,Peck on wide right ? Burrows midfield? Brooks and O hare didn’t know where they were playing ? Question marks returning.

He probably knew (like all of us) that we had a 20 year old in there who is on the verge of exhaustion, alongside a LB shoehorned into a position he can't play very well. So it's not surprising that the midfield was anonymous. If anything, he should be licking his lips at the prospect of being brought straight into the team.

Souza will start the next game, and Burrows reverted to LB (please god, don't start him in CM again!). I would also be amazed if Peck plays another 90 mins, so unless Davies makes a sudden comeback, Choudhury will be involved quite early in the match.
 
I really love Peck - I think he has it all but he needs to be coached to move the ball , and himself , forwards much much more . He loses his effect by tippy tippy passing sidewards and backwards.
He can’t do when there is no player demanding it or coming off an opponent. I’m no manager but I’d like to see him in a more attacking role,ie 15 metres further up,receiving the ball and moving it out wide quickly. I like him but he’s constipated in that role. A different player to Arblaster.
 
He probably knew (like all of us) that we had a 20 year old in there who is on the verge of exhaustion, alongside a LB shoehorned into a position he can't play very well. So it's not surprising that the midfield was anonymous. If anything, he should be licking his lips at the prospect of being brought straight into the team.

Souza will start the next game, and Burrows reverted to LB (please god, don't start him in CM again!). I would also be amazed if Peck plays another 90 mins, so unless Davies makes a sudden comeback, Choudhury will be involved quite early in the match.
Yes I’m with you on that,We were all over the place and they were a poor side. Overall I’m going to blame the management for an odd shape,tactics and a huge lack of technicality in what we do,as said we are regressing with a terrible style of football and getting worked out after 20 minutes. As my school reports said “must do better “ . 😉
 
Yes I’m with you on that,We were all over the place and they were a poor side. Overall I’m going to blame the management for an odd shape,tactics and a huge lack of technicality in what we do,as said we are regressing with a terrible style of football and getting worked out after 20 minutes. As my school reports said “must do better “ . 😉

Whilst I agree we were all over the place, I think you give Hull a bit of a disservice.

I thought tactically they got it spot on. Well organised, nicked a goal , put 11 men behind the ball and said break us down if you can. They passed it around pretty well and did to us what we have done to other teams this season

As for us, I think we missed Seriki, as young and raw as he is, he has pace and shows aggression going forward, something we lack and I’m including Brooksy and JRS when I say that
 
Whilst I agree we were all over the place, I think you give Hull a bit of a disservice.

I thought tactically they got it spot on. Well organised, nicked a goal , put 11 men behind the ball and said break us down if you can. They passed it around pretty well and did to us what we have done to other teams this season

As for us, I think we missed Seriki, as young and raw as he is, he has pace and shows aggression going forward, something we lack and I’m including Brooksy and JRS when I say that

Good post…..agree Hull were excellent, altho let’s not forget it was a freak result…the XG of 0.46 shows Hull hardly created any chances.
They sat back with the defence building a solid wall which we struggled to break through.

We were saying at half time, this had a Rotherham United feeling to it, remember during our promotion season when they were struggling near the bottom
But played really well and beat us 1-0. We still ended up promoted that season. We love and learn, plenty of the season left.
 

Whilst I agree we were all over the place, I think you give Hull a bit of a disservice.

I thought tactically they got it spot on. Well organised, nicked a goal , put 11 men behind the ball and said break us down if you can. They passed it around pretty well and did to us what we have done to other teams this season

As for us, I think we missed Seriki, as young and raw as he is, he has pace and shows aggression going forward, something we lack and I’m including Brooksy and JRS when I say that
Yes,maybe. We never put them under pressure and we went long time after time,they were blowing out of their arses after 30 minutes but we kept on making wrong decisions. They deserved it,no doubt and credit to their supporters who took the piss out of us. What happened to Seriki ? Is he made out of biscuits as well ?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom