bertieblade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
- Messages
- 5,277
- Reaction score
- 8,939
Totally agree “IF” we guarantee he can have that much influence
It did not last season
It did not last season
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
He scored 7 goals and notched 13 assists in 39 matches.Totally agree “IF” we guarantee he can have that much influence
It did not last season
What we need is players that improve the team there is not a player we can get to replace him for the money we would make. Id let him play out his contract.We need money, he’s in the last year of his deal. We’d be stupid not to sell if we get a sensible offer
We’d have got relegated without him.And we still did not get promoted
Love this logic shall we just sell everyone then?And we still did not get promoted
We are running a business with no guarantees, whatever happens is a gambleLove this logic shall we just sell everyone then?![]()
Of course you would, so would I because we’re fans…but we’re not paying the bills.What we need is players that improve the team there is not a player we can get to replace him for the money we would make. Id let him play out his contract.
I don’t understand how you think we’re in a financial position to just keep all our best players even if they don’t want to renew their contracts & let them go on a free.Love this logic shall we just sell everyone then?![]()
What if the alternative option is that we extend his contract and keep hold of one of the best midfielders in the league? A couple of months back there was talk of him being open to an extension.We need money, he’s in the last year of his deal. We’d be stupid not to sell if we get a sensible offer
Unfortunately, I work in finance.I don’t understand how you think we’re in a financial position to just keep all our best players even if they don’t want to renew their contracts & let them go on a free.
There’s probably only 5-10 clubs in the world that can afford to do that
I’m glad you’re not my accountant.
I agree BUT we do need that wild card. My worry is that we sell and never replace. Don’t necessarily mean with equal quality (probably impossible with current budget) but I terms of style. Otherwise we have a very samey and unimaginative midfield.unpopular opinion…
I think we looked a more solid … cohesive team without him last season.
However , he does have the ability to produce something out of nothing and do things others can’t
If we could find a ‘wild card’ who’s gonna cone off the bench and turn a game and replace him with that I wouldn’t be adverse to him leaving.
So we sell him for 5m. Invest in two other inferior players and yet these two inferior players will somehow contribute more than the best player in the division in recent times?So we now write off £3 / £5m not to guarantee promotion but in the hope we will not get relegated
This is why we need the academy to keep churning out the next ‘asset’. Worries me when we don’t blood enough youngsters as this is the only way we can really create money out of nothing, as such. Brooks for example, he has been around the first team for years and then broke in. I worry that there are not other players like that around - would be nice to see the likes of One, Blacker, Sachdev on bench more as opposed to older veterans as this should be our priority. I don’t think we always make enough of the amazing academy we have.We’re not a club that’s able to fund themselves. The owners don’t have the wealth & with the way the league works you have to balance the books. Hence why we’ve not spent the £7-8m received for Brooks.
For me it’s not about us selling players it’s about who we replace them with.
If you want to support a team that doesn’t sell their best players then Sheffield United aren’t the right club.
10 million thanks for everything Gus, 5 million he should be told he's going nowhere.This was this one move hamer knew this was going to happen when they went up, he’s been keeping an eye on things, good luck to him, thanks for everything gus.
Ultimately every team, other than Real Madrid, sells their best players.We’re not a club that’s able to fund themselves. The owners don’t have the wealth & with the way the league works you have to balance the books. Hence why we’ve not spent the £7-8m received for Brooks.
For me it’s not about us selling players it’s about who we replace them with.
If you want to support a team that doesn’t sell their best players then Sheffield United aren’t the right club.
Playing devils advocate slightly but there’s no guarantee he leaves on a free. Clubs haven’t exactly been beating down our door to sign him and most have walked away judging him poor value.Of course you would, so would I because we’re fans…but we’re not paying the bills.
Seeing Hamer go on a free transfer isn’t something that a club like us has the financial ability to do. I’m not sure how anyone thinks we can? The same happened with Berge & Ndiaye
Unfortunately, I work in finance.
What i care about is value, the money we would make from a hamer sale could never replace what a championship campaign of hamers talents can produce. With one year left on his deal the fee would be so poor we couldn’t afford anyone nearly half as good as him. So we would be having to spend more to replace his current contributions to the squad. If that means him walking on a free at the age of 31 so be it in my opinion.
And usually sign better onesUltimately every team, other than Real Madrid, sells their best players.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?