Barney
Well-Known Member
Barring an episode of managerial stupidity, it isn't at all likely we'd be starting next season with as big a squad as that.We could still have a 40+ squad for next season.
There's about 15 players out of contract.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Barring an episode of managerial stupidity, it isn't at all likely we'd be starting next season with as big a squad as that.We could still have a 40+ squad for next season.
That's not too bad because there are plenty more I'd get rid of before those two.
Barring an episode of managerial stupidity, it isn't at all likely we'd be starting next season with as big a squad as that.
There's about 15 players out of contract.
Looks like it's going to be the loan market.
If we loan players out, add new signings before Feb 1st, the loans return in June.
We could still have a 40+ squad for next season.
If we're talking of a mass clear out, let the cull begin.
Nah, we might as well get some use out of them now we're paying as much as we are.Who John Brayford and Billy Sharp?
Barring an episode of managerial stupidity, it isn't at all likely we'd be starting next season with as big a squad as that.
There's about 15 players out of contract.
According to this we've got 35 contracted players at the moment - excluding those we have on loan. I don't know whether they've signed up a batch of youngsters or what but I'm not sure where these 40+ figures are coming from.Not au-faix with the contract details, though if that's the case, we could be looking at closer to 30 on the books?
I was hoping somebody would have bought Freeman outright as he's one of the few players we have that seemed to have attracted interest. Be interesting to know how much of his wages Portsmouth are paying
Fair points. I wasn't making the point about promotion not being as important as getting rid of players simply because we've got rid of Freeman and I wasn't saying it was a bad move. What I'm saying is the major aim of this season is getting rid of the players not good enough. I think we are willing to leave ourselves short this season as long as we can get players off the bill. As I've said I'm not saying that's a bad thing , certainly not in the long term . My post was badly executed. It wasn't meant to be taken as a moan at the board for getting rid of Freeman
NA introduced the 40+ squad into the equation, he has the data, obviously this includes players in the U21/development squad who were probably awarded a 12 month contract, Otis Khan had a contract so he would have been included. As the club allowed these contracts in the first place it's not much of an argument, but no matter what these contracts are, monetary wise, they are still a cost to the club and 40+ is a hell of a number for a 3rd tier club. No wonder we are losing money year on year,
We'll be paying the U21's and some of the youth players obviously but I'm not sure it'd be that much to be worth including them in the figures.Can someone clarify exactly how many players we actually are paying it seemed to start at 35 ish in August and seemingly increases by 1 or 2 every interview !
Thanks for that, I thought I was going mad Brownie. Fuck me.
UTB
Bring on the cull!
Looks like it's going to be the loan market.
If we loan players out, add new signings before Feb 1st, the loans return in June.
We could still have a 40+ squad for next season.
If we're talking of a mass clear out, let the cull begin.
Nonsense. I'm totally hysterical.A player leaves, followed by some discussion and the odd concern about our cover at right back.
But why all talk of uproar etc? There's been no such thing!
A player leaves, followed by some discussion and the odd concern about our cover at right back.
But why all talk of uproar etc? There's been no such thing!
Flynn?Agreed. He's not involved so a good idea to loan him out, but unless K Wallace can play right back as well, we're taking a risk. Flynn can cover there but he's been intermittently injured all season.
As for Basham playing there, who is going to cover Basham if he does?
Agreed. He's not involved so a good idea to loan him out, but unless K Wallace can play right back as well, we're taking a risk. Flynn can cover there but he's been intermittently injured all season.
As for Basham playing there, who is going to cover Basham if he does?
I dont think playing 20 minutes out of position precludes a player covering elsewhere (particularly somewhere where he's done a job in the past).
Seems a fairly abstract criticism that we now can't consider Flynn as RB cover.
Hammond and Baxter like the other night is a good guess
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?