bromtom
Well-Known Member/ Former F1 Driver Jos Verstappen
Tom, it's a game where human decision making will always cause debate, so to sanitise every possible situation that can possibly be disputed is to remove good decisions as well as bad. The fact that VAR seems to cause weekly disputes suggests that it's no better or worse than the referees you mention, so we're left with a system that costs a fortune and contributes little in terms of progress, leaving the majority of supporters baffled by the decision making that's employed.
Whatever the pros and cons that surround referees, and I agree that they need help in certain situations, my preference is that referees should be allowed to officiate with, where necessary, the help of the fourth official that was brought in to do this exact job. It may not be perfect, but is it any less effective than what we've seen from VAR up until this part of the season.....the answer appears to be that all we've received from VAR is controversy, most of which divides opinion and remains unconvincing in it's application.
I 100% agree, just saying that's why we're where we are.
There's a joy in football in getting away with one, and over the course of the season you usually get a few stinkers against you too, so it evens out, but the standard of officiating has fell off a cliff and the stakes get higher and higher so something needed to be done.
Unfortunately though, instead of watering the plant and giving if a good prune, they spray painted the dead brown leaves green.
Pension off some of the old fat refs that can't keep up with play, spend money training more assistants and referees, facilities around the country, etc.
VAR has its uses and with tweaks will be fine going forward, the problem is the referees overseeing it's wider implementation and use on match days.
