Incoming? Dominquez Quina

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Blade56 said:
View attachment 30163
Ah bless, he's not been to the clubs classes for adults learning to read, write and spell, 'Brammal' Lane?


Irony when B56 gets the opportunity to piss take spelling. :cool:
Click to expand...

Of course he'd "get away with it", it's what the Cockney bastards do well. If he does burn our ground to the ground, will we be given a taxpayer funded replacement?
 
Super 6-1 said:
Just watched his video which should be a best of. Sorry he is nowhere good enough and anyone can see that. Any Blade on here who thinks otherwise is completely wrong.
Click to expand...
Thanks for that S6-1, if only we didn't have all those bloody scouts around wasting the club's money watching players in actual games when all it takes is a quick viewing of a kid kicking a football on youtube! :)
 


Doesn't bode well this. Probably about Plan G, H or I. Another player very unlikely to go into the first 11. Not competition for Fleck's role, not the position we need. It could suggest Brooks is off. Puts pressure on our last 2 signings, and makes us less likely to sign the 2 attackers that we need. Unless we're after 4 in total today.
 
Champagneblade said:
Don't see how you can say that Robbie given you haven't seen him play.

Let's see how it all looks in 24 hours.
One thing's for sure, it's really struck a nerve with their fans. Inagine if they get relegated and while doing so help us get promoted!
Click to expand...
It would strike a nerve with those cockney twats, if we tried to loan one of their match-day stewards.
 
Ricky said:


Doesn't bode well this. Probably about Plan G, H or I. Another player very unlikely to go into the first 11. Not competition for Fleck's role, not the position we need. It could suggest Brooks is off. Puts pressure on our last 2 signings, and makes us less likely to sign the 2 attackers that we need. Unless we're after 4 in total today.
Click to expand...

But if, as most of us seem to think, Brooks IS in or around the first team, why would taking a player who is "very unlikely" to go into the first 11" suggest that Brooks is off?
 
Harrisblade said:
But if, as most of us seem to think, Brooks IS in or around the first team, why would taking a player who is "very unlikely" to go into the first 11" suggest that Brooks is off?
Click to expand...

Another attacking midfielder with flair and creativity. It doesn't mean Brooks is going but it certainly doesn't make him more likely to stay.
 
Ricky said:


Doesn't bode well this. Probably about Plan G, H or I. Another player very unlikely to go into the first 11. Not competition for Fleck's role, not the position we need. It could suggest Brooks is off. Puts pressure on our last 2 signings, and makes us less likely to sign the 2 attackers that we need. Unless we're after 4 in total today.
Click to expand...


Really can't see us doing 4 - so it could suggest Sinclair has fallen through and we're thinking of 2 behind sharp rather than 2 up top.

I'm looking forward to seeing him play tho.

Still think we need a box to boxer for competition in the middle.
 
Harrisblade said:
But if, as most of us seem to think, Brooks IS in or around the first team, why would taking a player who is "very unlikely" to go into the first 11" suggest that Brooks is off?
Click to expand...

I don't think there's any reason or point in signing him unless Brooks is off. I doubt our mates West Ham are going to lend us a player who doesn't get a fair whack of game time.

I would be very worried, in terms of both Brooks going and our ability to sign players, if he comes.
 
Bladeinleeds said:
Really can't see us doing 4 - so it could suggest Sinclair has fallen through and we're thinking of 2 behind sharp rather than 2 up top.

I'm looking forward to seeing him play tho.

Still think we need a box to boxer for competition in the middle.
Click to expand...

I'm thinking we're still quite likely to sign a different type of midfielder, that's why it could make 2 attackers less likely.
 
Maybe Carruthers is off?

No substance to this. Not even a rumour.

Just lost his place to Duffy, Brooks making progress at great pace.

Say his mate Robbo weighs in with 750k and we see limits to his ability at this level...not impossible. Then we might need another option.
 
The conspiracy theorists would say the boy gets us into the premiership then spam can do to us what they did with Tevez :tumbleweed:
 

We get one of the most highly rated youngsters around and it's the end of the world.

I can't wait to see him. The option to have him and Brookes running at defences is exciting and will cause carnage.

Just need a quick powerful goalscorer now.
 
robbiez666 said:
I've only seen him play a couple of times, granted, but nothing else I've seen or read about him makes me think I'm wrong. He's flimsy, lacks end product, no defensive ability or workrate and makes bad decisions.

He's behind Brooks I'm terms of development at the moment and really does seem to be an unlikely Wilder player. He would probably be a great loan signing in a couple of years but not now for me.

Sorry, forgot to quote you Chali 2na
Click to expand...

Fair enough if you've seen him play Robbie. :)

I wrongly assumed that you we're writing him off based on a quick Google.
 
bertieblade said:
This surely means that Nathan Thomas is off?
Click to expand...

I think so. I don't get this signing right now. By the end of the day though I think we'll know why, unless as others have said Wilder is maybe going to change formation and go 4-2-3-1.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Liaminho9
Incoming? Josafat Wooding Mendes
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Balham
Balham
JOEYDEE
Incoming? Joe Mendes
Replies
11
Views
3K
The Crab
The Crab
MayorOJC
Out of Contract Players
2 3
Replies
71
Views
7K
Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou
Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou
Nicolaus_Copernicus
Player Suggestion Luciano Valente - Groningen
Replies
4
Views
1K
brownblade
brownblade
jono_t2000
Grok AI - Midfielders
Replies
10
Views
2K
jono_t2000
jono_t2000

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom