So if you're saying it's both then which teams are the officials biased against?
Have a look at that penalty that was given against West Ham earlier. It's one of the worst decisions I've seen in a long time. Never, ever a penalty in a million years at any level of the game.
And then there was a daft amount of time added on just like in our game.
Where's the bias, where's the corruption?
Why are Newcastle being helped against West Ham? What is going on?
Please explain it to me.
The word corruption is maybe a touch emotive.
But the referees have a clear tendency to make life easy for themselves, both on the pitch and on VAR.
Yes, there is rank incompetence. But stuff like fouls for very little, headers competed for by the likes of McBurnie, thrown-ins if in doubt, the evaluation of petulance, the amount of time added on are given on a principle of least resistance expected.
They say nine if we lead, seven if we don’t. If you are planning to pull me up on the „we“, substitute for the „less glamorous“ team or in other cases „away side“.
Such bias for staying out of troubled with the press, pundits or more outspoken but favoured managers may be another function of incompetence, but you cannot be serious if you tell me that you feel that Burnley, us, Wolves or Forest on average get the numerous inadvertent margin calls anywhere near 50% when playing more established opposition.
It was this way in 2007. Even in our year of glory in the Prem, we literally were the guinea pig for VAR on many occasions. Ghost goal, elongated toe about 28 seconds prior to a goal three phases of play back, offside flagged but goal stood despite everybody stopping and staring.
All of it incompetence? Or conveniently low-key opportunities to tweak interpretation in matches of limited interest? With PGMOL covering their mates while saying „lads, can you imagine Pep or Kloppo having to suck this one up?“
I do not sense a specific anti-United agenda, but the percentages are stacked 55-45 against teams of our ilk in particular in small margin events.