INTAKE BLADE
Wide awake
Can remember Ashton and Bellemy shaking hands like gents after one of the twats scored for Norwich in a 3.1 win at the lane. He did say he could've stayed on his feet then Colin said dive or not and he said he dived. Twat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
An opinion? Are you daft? It’s a complete lie, he’s painting McGoldrick as a cheat. Not an opinion.
I’ve seen it with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears.Funny you say that because in someone else’s opinion he didn’t say that at all.
Don't mention that on here in relation to Morgs on Gerrard though.
Just goes to show we're all biased.
Dronnie you liked my response so acknowledged it but haven’t responded.Look back on what was ACTUALLY said. He didn’t say he dived. He said he could have stayed on his feet.
Using the D word amplifies, and takes out of context, what was actually said to make a specific point that, bluntly, isn’t there !!
IMHO.
UTB
He said the same about Humpty Dumpty no doubt. “And if those King’s horses and men had been on their game they’d have patched him up oreight”Couldve stayed on his feet.
Dived.
Same thing.
There’s loads of rules that have changed that have passed me by. Ranting and raving one way or another doesn’t solve anything. I believe the six second rule for keepers was brief but many still get apoplectic if it’s exceeded. No footballer will ever put the ball in the zone marked at a corner when taking one. No matter how much folk point. Offside and passages of play baffles me sometimes. All in all I trust the ref to know better than me.McG didn't dive - the Forest defender made it impossible to get in on goal with his "missed" initial attempt (and well done to McG for trying to continue) - if you watch the video it's McG rear leg that catches the defender as he brings it down.
The defender caused McG not to have a clear goal scoring action because of his action - the REF got it spot on.
As for covering players - the 2 Forest defenders were 2 yards behind - that is not covering. The ref got it spot on. What some also need to understand is that the defender wanted to stop McG progress and if it had happened in the area it would have been a penalty and NOT a sending off. He knew exactly what he was doing and didn't get away with it.
Whether or not anyone actually agrees with ALL of the new rules, brought in to stop CYNICAL footballers is immaterial - they ARE the rules and VAR will hopefully stop a lot of the other cynical actions in and around the penalty box. Ban a few players for 3, then 5, then 10 games for repeated offences and it will soon stop.
Spurs are in the semi final of the Champions league because of VAR - that too is there for a reason.
UTB
You are correct. He does use the word dive.Dronnie you liked my response so acknowledged it but haven’t responded.
Have you seen it back? He says ‘so it’s a dive’ at the end of the segment.
So bluntly, the specific point I’m raising is there.
Glad we’ve squared that offYou are correct. He does use the word dive.
My bad.
UTB
But if you watch the Sky Sports coverage at full time, Keith Andrews said the referee got it spot on. Like the lad along with Ian Holloway. Get rid of misery guts Ashton. UTB
Yes, he got it spot on
I don't know how many have actually played football on here or not.
The slightest touch, a slight brush against you when you're moving at speed and it's enough to make you lose your balance/footing
McGoldrick tried to stay on his feet IMO and get into the space to shoot, but he couldn't
Whether the Forest player should have been sent off is a different argument, but it was a foul, and yes McGoldrick was clean through if it wasn't for the defender stopping him from doing so
If, like you say, he was clean through on goal (which he was), then there's not a very good argument for it not being a sending off.Whether the Forest player should have been sent off is a different argument, but it was a foul, and yes McGoldrick was clean through if it wasn't for the defender stopping him from doing so
An opinion? Are you daft? It’s a complete lie, he’s painting McGoldrick as a cheat. Not an opinion.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?