Dean Ashton

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Can remember Ashton and Bellemy shaking hands like gents after one of the twats scored for Norwich in a 3.1 win at the lane. He did say he could've stayed on his feet then Colin said dive or not and he said he dived. Twat
 



An opinion? Are you daft? It’s a complete lie, he’s painting McGoldrick as a cheat. Not an opinion.

Funny you say that because in someone else’s opinion he didn’t say that at all.
 
Don't mention that on here in relation to Morgs on Gerrard though.

Just goes to show we're all biased.

I think Leeds intended to score 30 odd times yesterday each time they took a shot - shall we give them 30 goals and 3pts against Wigan??
 
Leigh Bromby stayed on his feet and consequently the ref didn't give anything even though he knew he'd been caught. Never mind it's not like one extra goal cost us 30 million quid.
 
Look back on what was ACTUALLY said. He didn’t say he dived. He said he could have stayed on his feet.

Using the D word amplifies, and takes out of context, what was actually said to make a specific point that, bluntly, isn’t there !!

IMHO.

UTB
Dronnie you liked my response so acknowledged it but haven’t responded.

Have you seen it back? He says ‘so it’s a dive’ at the end of the segment.

So bluntly, the specific point I’m raising is there.
 
McG didn't dive - the Forest defender made it impossible to get in on goal with his "missed" initial attempt (and well done to McG for trying to continue) - if you watch the video it's McG rear leg that catches the defender as he brings it down.

The defender caused McG not to have a clear goal scoring action because of his action - the REF got it spot on.

As for covering players - the 2 Forest defenders were 2 yards behind - that is not covering. The ref got it spot on. What some also need to understand is that the defender wanted to stop McG progress and if it had happened in the area it would have been a penalty and NOT a sending off. He knew exactly what he was doing and didn't get away with it.

Whether or not anyone actually agrees with ALL of the new rules, brought in to stop CYNICAL footballers is immaterial - they ARE the rules and VAR will hopefully stop a lot of the other cynical actions in and around the penalty box. Ban a few players for 3, then 5, then 10 games for repeated offences and it will soon stop.

Spurs are in the semi final of the Champions league because of VAR - that too is there for a reason.

UTB
There’s loads of rules that have changed that have passed me by. Ranting and raving one way or another doesn’t solve anything. I believe the six second rule for keepers was brief but many still get apoplectic if it’s exceeded. No footballer will ever put the ball in the zone marked at a corner when taking one. No matter how much folk point. Offside and passages of play baffles me sometimes. All in all I trust the ref to know better than me.

Thanks for the post.
 
But if you watch the Sky Sports coverage at full time, Keith Andrews said the referee got it spot on. Like the lad along with Ian Holloway. Get rid of misery guts Ashton. UTB


Yes, he got it spot on
I don't know how many have actually played football on here or not.

The slightest touch, a slight brush against you when you're moving at speed and it's enough to make you lose your balance/footing

McGoldrick tried to stay on his feet IMO and get into the space to shoot, but he couldn't

Whether the Forest player should have been sent off is a different argument, but it was a foul, and yes McGoldrick was clean through if it wasn't for the defender stopping him from doing so
 
Yes, he got it spot on
I don't know how many have actually played football on here or not.

The slightest touch, a slight brush against you when you're moving at speed and it's enough to make you lose your balance/footing

McGoldrick tried to stay on his feet IMO and get into the space to shoot, but he couldn't

Whether the Forest player should have been sent off is a different argument, but it was a foul, and yes McGoldrick was clean through if it wasn't for the defender stopping him from doing so

Yes. Excellent post.
There’s probably a few posters on ‘ere who’ve experienced that sort of tackle where the slightest contact is enough to bring you to ground.
You can clearly tell by the way Didsy went down that it was uncontrolled.
For the rest, imagine going for an urgent piss after ten pints and tripping over the cat.
 
Whether the Forest player should have been sent off is a different argument, but it was a foul, and yes McGoldrick was clean through if it wasn't for the defender stopping him from doing so
If, like you say, he was clean through on goal (which he was), then there's not a very good argument for it not being a sending off.

Can't have been an easy one to call from the referee's perspective in real time. Fair play to him for making the decision.
 
An opinion? Are you daft? It’s a complete lie, he’s painting McGoldrick as a cheat. Not an opinion.

So what? Will all refs now take Dean Ashton’s opinion as gospel and never award a foul on McGoldrick? Who gives a shit what Ashton thinks.

Personally I ain’t arsed if he dived or not, we should dive! All teams do it, why put yourself at a disadvantage? The vast majority of fans actually think like that, but just won’t admit it.
 
One David McGoldrick :cool:
Just happens that Dissy played for Ipswich and nob end Ashton used to play for Norwich , erm ???
One David McGoldrick :cool:
One David McGoldrick :cool:
One David McGoldrick :cool:
One David McGoldrick :cool:
One David McGoldrick :cool:
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom