Coventry

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Paulus

Active Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
1,630
Reaction score
2,264
I thought we did ok last night, better than I was expecting after the doom merchant comments on Sat. Defence looked Ok, KMac looked a little short of fitness but showed some good touches. Quinn was, by a distance the best player on the pitch, I hope to hell we can keep him. Cofie is still very much a junior and has bucket loads to learn if he is going to be effective. Miller looked bright with good movement when he came on, would like to see him start next time.

It looked as though we got away with one with the goal line clearance, thank you FIFA for being useless. We certainly aren't the finished article but if we can get some threat from the right mid we might do well this year.
 



Not many reports so far so thanks for this Paulus. Any chance you can knock up some players ratings, they're my favourite part? :)
 
My take on the match was that we should have been two goals up by half time and cruising but a combination of poor finishing, trying the extra pass and losing the ball in key areas by overplay resulted in Coventry coming back into it for the last 15-2omins of the first half
The second half was totally different with the Blades on the back foot and the Coventry fans finally finding their voice!
We still created good chances wasted by both Quinny and MacAllister
Covs goal was pure route one
Miller looked good when he came on and the equiliser was what we deserved!
I think Wilsons comments after the match was totally OTT - we are not that good!
Cofie looks raw and I would think Miller is a better bet to start
MacAllister looked woeful last night yet still played the entire 90mins+
Why won't Wilson use his subs???
Marks:
Howard 7
McMahon 7
McGuire 6
Collins 7
Hill 6
MacAllister 5
Doyle 6
MacDonald 8
Quinn 7.5
Blackman 7
Cofie 5
Sub Miller 6
 
We were fantastic first half, Quinn and KMac the top performers. Dare I say it, Hill had a decent game over all (sliding lunge resulting in a booking aside). We controlled the game for the first 4o minutes, and for having some sharper finishing up top would have been two or three to the good.

Coventry got back into the game and marginally on top for the last 5 of the first half and for 2/3's of the second, and we got caught out with the long ball that resulted in the goal.

We looked a lot brighter when Miller came on (this was my first viewing of him) and he impressed, full of running and determination. He had the pace to trouble the Coventry back four and showed a lot of commitment, and played a fantastic role with his assist for the goal. Perhaps a chance to start with Blackman would give us a better idea of what he is capable of.

Overall I wasn't overly dissapointed with a draw, especially as after conceding and failing to take our chances throughout the match I wasn't expecting us to come away with anything. A point against a favored team early doors will do for me, plenty for us to be optimistic about.

Officials were not great but Coventry suffered their blunders just as much if not, a little more. I just expect this standard now. The lino on the left hand side was abysmal. Also a quick grumble about their ball boys efforts, although I felt sorry for the kid behind the Cov goal ingront of our fans-he took some stick and he's only a boy.

UTB!
 
Feels very similar to the start of last season. The performances always seemed really fragile, like we're just waiting to go on a devastating run of bad form at any moment
 
We were fantastic first half, Quinn and KMac the top performers. Dare I say it, Hill had a decent game over all (sliding lunge resulting in a booking aside). We controlled the game for the first 4o minutes, and for having some sharper finishing up top would have been two or three to the good.

Coventry got back into the game and marginally on top for the last 5 of the first half and for 2/3's of the second, and we got caught out with the long ball that resulted in the goal.

We looked a lot brighter when Miller came on (this was my first viewing of him) and he impressed, full of running and determination. He had the pace to trouble the Coventry back four and showed a lot of commitment, and played a fantastic role with his assist for the goal. Perhaps a chance to start with Blackman would give us a better idea of what he is capable of.

Overall I wasn't overly dissapointed with a draw, especially as after conceding and failing to take our chances throughout the match I wasn't expecting us to come away with anything. A point against a favored team early doors will do for me, plenty for us to be optimistic about.

Officials were not great but Coventry suffered their blunders just as much if not, a little more. I just expect this standard now. The lino on the left hand side was abysmal. Also a quick grumble about their ball boys efforts, although I felt sorry for the kid behind the Cov goal ingront of our fans-he took some stick and he's only a boy.

UTB!

Thanks - on the comms it sounded like Richard Wood saved them a few times.
 
I didn't make last weeks game (who organises a wedding on the opening day?!) nor last nights but early reports on Cofie don't sound encouraging.

Is he unfit or just not good enough?
 
Looked unfit Wards on Satdi - cant comment on last night though
 
I think he's just young and naive. He's keen to beat one player too many, when the better decision is to soot or pass, that type of thing. He'll get better. And then ManUre will recall him.
 
My take on the match was that we should have been two goals up by half time and cruising but a combination of poor finishing, trying the extra pass and losing the ball in key areas by overplay resulted in Coventry coming back into it for the last 15-2omins of the first half
The second half was totally different with the Blades on the back foot and the Coventry fans finally finding their voice!
We still created good chances wasted by both Quinny and MacAllister
Covs goal was pure route one
Miller looked good when he came on and the equiliser was what we deserved!
I think Wilsons comments after the match was totally OTT - we are not that good!
Cofie looks raw and I would think Miller is a better bet to start
MacAllister looked woeful last night yet still played the entire 90mins+
Why won't Wilson use his subs???
Marks:
Howard 7
McMahon 7
McGuire 6
Collins 7
Hill 6
MacAllister 5
Doyle 6
MacDonald 8
Quinn 7.5
Blackman 7
Cofie 5
Sub Miller 6

I'm always a little amused when fans (of all clubs) go on about substitutes. We ought to reflect on:

1. Substitutes are on the bench because other players are regarded as worthier of selection than them. That's as true in the 70th minute as it is in the first.

2. Across professional football hundreds of substitutes are used every week. In the overwhelming majority of cases they have little or no impact.

3. It's only news when the "super sub" scores or excels. No-one reports the times he gives away a penalty or misses a sitter.
 
I'm always a little amused when fans (of all clubs) go on about substitutes. We ought to reflect on:

1. Substitutes are on the bench because other players are regarded as worthier of selection than them. That's as true in the 70th minute as it is in the first.

2. Across professional football hundreds of substitutes are used every week. In the overwhelming majority of cases they have little or no impact.

3. It's only news when the "super sub" scores or excels. No-one reports the times he gives away a penalty or misses a sitter.

Shouldn't we also reflect on the fact that the subs will become starters in the event of injury or supension?

The bench we have now is the weakest I've seen in many a long year.
 
I didn't make last weeks game (who organises a wedding on the opening day?!) nor last nights but early reports on Cofie don't sound encouraging.

Is he unfit or just not good enough?

On last nights showing Cofie looked exactly what he is, a 19 year old playing a mans game. He's a trier I'll give him that but his tricks didn't come off at all last night and dare I say it looks a little out of his depth. Blackman and Miller when he came on looked a far better partnership. Cofie may make more impact as a sub when opposition legs are getting tired etc etc. UTB
 
I'm always a little amused when fans (of all clubs) go on about substitutes. We ought to reflect on:

1. Substitutes are on the bench because other players are regarded as worthier of selection than them. That's as true in the 70th minute as it is in the first.

2. Across professional football hundreds of substitutes are used every week. In the overwhelming majority of cases they have little or no impact.

3. It's only news when the "super sub" scores or excels. No-one reports the times he gives away a penalty or misses a sitter.

Last night with ten minutes to go we had only used one sub and were losing a game 1-0 when we should have been out of sight in the first half.

Both Quinn and MacAllister had ballooned good chances over the bar and we seemed to be running out of ideas

In fact it was the only sub used Miller who broke in from the left to create the goal for Blackman - so bang goes your theory!!

And on Cofie - he looked a boy playing with men - not sure what he can give us this season - Philliskirk and Ironside would be as effective!
 
And here's my take on last nights game:

Fairly good defensive performance, although I thought we gave them a poor goal from our perspective

Midfield played well, especially Quinn and MacD, although MacD uncharacteristically made a number of errors

Attack for me is the main problem. We seem to lack punch. There is litle cohesion between Blackman and Cofie. They play "together" like two strangers if yopu get my drift. Some will argue that it's early days, but Cofie in perticular doesn't look quite up to the task at the moment

Verdict:

Good perfromance, but lacking bite. Poor finishing, goal apart

Worried what our midfield will look like without Quinn if he's sold

We lack width (highlighted by Cov fans saying we play very narrow)

Would like to see Miller get a start as he looks lively, has good movement and seems like an intelligent player

Also worried that we wont score enough goals which will ultimately cost us.

Two games gone so too early to say how we are goner end up, but for me, we look more like a top 8 side than a top 4 side (if you no what I mean)
 



Midfield played well, especially Quinn and MacD, although MacD uncharacteristically made a number of errors

MacD did make a number of errors but is still a lovely footballer to watch. I was puzzled why he spent the vast majority of the game in a wide left position when he has no real pace or left foot?
 
MacD did make a number of errors but is still a lovely footballer to watch. I was puzzled why he spent the vast majority of the game in a wide left position when he has no real pace or left foot?

I was told we played a diamond formation, was it like this?:

Howard​
McMahon Maguire Collins Hill​
McAllister Doyle McDonald​
Quinn​
Blackman Cofie​
 
I was told we played a diamond formation, was it like this?:

Howard​
McMahon Maguire Collins Hill​
McAllister Doyle McDonald​
Quinn​
Blackman Cofie​

I'd suggest it was a little more fluid than a diamond formation, but that's not far out over all.
 
I suppose we could call it a diamond in the sense that no-one was playing as an orthodox wide player. Doyle was usually the anchor whilst the other three seemed to move across the pitch with a good degree of freedom. Quinn and McDonald were predominantly on the left with McAllister more on the right.
 
The lack of width just screamed that we are in desperate need of another wide man, but I can't see one coming in.

RE Cofie, I'd still rather he was in the starting 11 over Philiskirk, I'm yet to be convinced by him and I see Cofie creating something more than Phili-like his goal v Rotherham. I'd like to see Ironside tried, but all three are 'unproven' young lads, and Cofie probably has more about him than the other two otherwise he'd not be at Manure.

Miller needs a chance sooner or later, but I doubt Cofie will be dropped just yet.
 
Last night with ten minutes to go we had only used one sub and were losing a game 1-0 when we should have been out of sight in the first half.

Both Quinn and MacAllister had ballooned good chances over the bar and we seemed to be running out of ideas

In fact it was the only sub used Miller who broke in from the left to create the goal for Blackman - so bang goes your theory!!

And on Cofie - he looked a boy playing with men - not sure what he can give us this season - Philliskirk and Ironside would be as effective!

Hardly. It's bang goes your thrice-punctuated question, surely?

Anyway, it's not theory; it's FACT (issue settled by use of capitals :))
 
Gotta admit, that was a fine goal we scored on Tuesday!

I was moaning with the rest until that point.
 
To me Cofie looks abit like Jon Forte when he came on the scene. Fast but doesnt really know what to do with it
 
Wrote this yesterday but never got on wifi to put it up

______________________________________

Although the result was disappointing in some ways, despite being one I’d have taken before the match, I think there were more positives to take from last night’s performance than the preceding one v Shrewsbury.

DW, clearly with Bergen’s concerns in mind, went with a diamond formation in midfield. The make up of this was fairly fluid with seemingly only Doyle retaining his position throughout. In the first half hour especially we retained the ball better than Saturday, looked a much more solid unit and created good openings.

It did however mean we were lacking in width – this ended up causing two problems. First, Blackman and Cofie kept drifting wide to try and compensate and this meant there was often a huge distance between them and they couldn’t get involved or keep the ball up front. The second problem was that it made it easy for Coventry to tweak their set up in the 2nd half to cause us problems. Whereas in the first half they did very little, in the 2nd they moved players much wider and had loads of room to get at us.

If we’d taken our first half chances (Cofie, McDonald, Maguire all could/should have scored), the game would have been pretty much over by half time. As it was, we ended up being a shade fortunate to still be in the game when Blackman got the equaliser.

For most of the game we worked some excellent positions, almost at will, however our final pass/cross/shot was consistently very poor all night.

Few thoughts on some of the players:

McMahon – much better performance than Saturday. A little worried that he doesn’t quite fit with the football we like to play though. He’s decent technically and can get forward but he isn’t the Walker/Lowton ultra-attacking type that we might need (especially given our lack of options in right midfield).

Hill – like McMahon, he doesn’t quite fit with DW’s preferred style. He was very solid last night though and was an improvement on Williams.

McAllister – definitely adds a goal threat to a team which has few. However, I’m not convinced he has the fitness, touch or speed of thought/movement for this level of football.

McDonald – hate to think how we’d look without him in the side but, for the time being, he’s not up to the standards he set last season. Last night, he probably gave the ball away more than he did in the whole of last season. Sure it’s just a sharpness thing though and he’ll improve and be crucial for us.

Miller – did really well when he came on. Links the play well, looks sharp and caused Coventry problems. Got to be close to a start.

Overall, some encouragement to be taken from the performance. The squad looks woefully thin though, particularly in terms of wide options, and we’re incredibly reliant on McDonald from a creative point of view. Although they did cause us problems in the 2nd half, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Coventry have a season struggling in the bottom half of the table, I thought they were very poor indeed.
 
Have you seen our bench lately? with us not having Cressy, monty "for financial reasons" and a few injuries not got much to choose from especially if we were trying to win the game.
At that stage of the game MacAllister was looking woeful and we were not finishing anything in ther third of the pitch -consistantly giving away the final ball or ballooning it over the bar - perhaps Flynn would have offered us something different - something Miller did minutes later from the left
Whilst I am not Flynns biggest fan just perhaps!!!
 
I think Flynn was carrying an injury which could do with a couple more days to be on the safe side and would only have come on in an emergency ie one of the midfilders being unable to carry on.
 
At that stage of the game MacAllister was looking woeful and we were not finishing anything in ther third of the pitch -consistantly giving away the final ball or ballooning it over the bar - perhaps Flynn would have offered us something different - something Miller did minutes later from the left
Whilst I am not Flynns biggest fan just perhaps!!!
Yeah see what you are saying but like paulus says i think flynn is carrying an injury. I would say it is all about DW selecting the right bench for different games we don't have much to go at but what we do have can give us the option to change tactics or formation depending on the scoreline. Once everyone is fit ie porter/flynn and even though both aren't massive favourites with all blades they do carry a different threat that some teams may not be able to cope with that. Its going to be a long and different season and its all about keeping key players fit, if we were to lose McDonald or collins for any length of time we'd be in the shite but keep them injury free along with the rest then we still have a good chance.
 
DW, clearly with Bergen’s concerns in mind, went with a diamond formation in midfield. The make up of this was fairly fluid with seemingly only Doyle retaining his position throughout. In the first half hour especially we retained the ball better than Saturday, looked a much more solid unit and created good openings.

The photo below shows the diamond formation with Doyle just in front of the defence. But you're right that it was fluid and all eleven did their bit defensively.

Coventry away formation-photo.jpg
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom