Coventry 2 United 2 - report / ratings

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Deadbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,198
Reaction score
34,751
The Blades four game winning run came to an end in the lunchtime kick off CBS Arena, as manager-less Coventry were able to come back twice to earn a share of the spoils. In the end, this did not really tell the story of a contest where despite the Blades scoring two excellent goals, the Sky Blues were the team in the ascendancy for much of the game. However, the Blades led at the break despite Anel Ahmedhodzic’s moment of madness that saw his side reduced to ten men. The Blades could not quite hold on and poor defending at a corner saw City get the leveller. In the end, it was a point gained from United, who were far from their best even at eleven v eleven and will now examine a growing list of unavailable players with two more games to come this week. Still, the point took them top even if for only a few hours and continued their good recent run.



There was just one change for the Blades with Peck in for Arblaster, after the news that the influential midfielder would be out for the season after rupturing his ACL during the Sheffield derby. Tom Davies was back on the bench, joining two other namesakes, Norrington Davies and Adam Davies -in a largely inexperienced bench.



Coventry were without Haji Wright and opted to keep Ellis Simms and Brandon Thomas-Assante on the bench, starting with Belgian Norman Bassette, a summer signing from French club Caen.



Game started with the bizarre circus of Hamer getting cheers and O’Hamer boos but City started the better side and the Blades were second to the ball. Souttar and Ahmedhodzic were both making uncharacteristic errors as the City player pushed really high up. Sheaf had the first effort but his low shot was straight at the keeper before Ahmedhozic’s clumsy foul gave City a free kick. Eccles shot was blocked by Souza.



United had not been in the game but with their first attack took the lead as Hamer sent a lovely ball inside the full back and Rak Sakyi was in down the right. His cross was perfect and CAMPBELL side footed him home. It was his first touch and continued his hot streak of form.



United were buoyed by this and Hamer found Rak Sakyi whose return ball to the former Coventry man saw his shot blocked. Souttar headed over in the best spell of the game for the visitors.



However, City were able to get level as Eccles put in a really dangerous cross and Souttar was unable to cut it out and BASSETTE got a touch and diverted it past Cooper. It was a deserved leveller from the home side who had been the better side.



Ahmedhodzic stepped out of the back and fed O’Hare whose effort was blocked but Coventry were still having more of the ball, despite United being a real threat on the break. They won a number of corners and from one such delivery, Binks made a mess of a free header, putting it over.



The defensive mistakes continued from United as they kept giving the ball away but when they did break, they were able to show real quality. Souza won the ball and Hamer fed Rak Sakyi and from the left hand side, he hit a beautiful shot into the far corner.



United led but their was no real control despite two excellent goals. Burrows made another defensive mistake and led to Rudoni’s cross and Torp’s header was straight at Cooper. Hamer and O’Hare’s career paths have been inextricably linked and they both got very close to each other again as they tackled each other. Coventry continued to look very dangerous and had appeals for a penalty as Rudoni advanced but the replays showed he slipped. Torp pulled his shot wide.



In an action-packed half, the drama continued as the Blades were reduced to ten men just before the break. Bassette had caught Ahmedhodzic twice and from another foul, the Blades player was not happy that he was being accused of going down too easily and reacted stupidly to the questioning as he pushed his opponent in the face. After the melee, that ensued, the red card seemed the only call that could be made despite some provocation and wind up from the City man. The fall to the floor and hold to the face was disappointing but the striker clearly had suckered the centre half into an unnecessary reaction. Ahmedhodzic exited leaving a threadbare squad even more vulnerable and now having a real uphill task to take anything from the game. The strikers wink said it all after the action restarted.



City had five extra minutes to find a leveller, as Robinson replaced Campbell and they nearly were level when Da Silva was left unmarked at the back post but his header was turned away superbly by Cooper. The acrimony continued as the players left with the field with pushing and shoving in the tunnel.



Seriki took the place of Rak Sakyi as United tried to ensure they had enough defensive solidity to try and see the game out but it was the home side predictably doing the early running. Souza got caught but no card was incoming but the Blades were playing without a striker with O’Hare and Hamer now seeing little of the ball.



Sakamoto, Mason Clark and Thomas Asante were on for Latibeaudiere, Torp and Bassette. With the striker getting a send off from the travelling fans for his part in playing the pantomime villain. Thomas Asante’s first contribution saw him take a tumble and try and con the referee as the theatrics from the Coventry strikers continued. This time the referee ruled in favour of the Blades and the yellow card was handed out to the substitute. Burrows reaction to the dive saw him booked as he was also stupid to react, as he too raised his hands.



Coventry were moving it from side to side and were forcing the Blades back but had not created too much until the 65th minute when Van Ewijk’s shot was flicked over for a corner. McCallum conceded another and the pressure was mounting now. Van Ewijk had a low shot that beat Cooper but hit the outside of the post in the closest they had gone this half to levelling. City had the ball in the net as Mason Clark was given too much space and found Thomas Asante but as the striker converted, the offside flag went up, as he had gone too early.



One and Shackleton came on for O’Hare and Hamer as United’s blueprint was even more firmly established. The opposite was true of Coventry as Simms came on for Eccles. Another chance saw Sakamoto play a ball into the box and as it came across Thomas Asante missed from point blank range. Peck then was adjudged to have tripped Sakamoto – although replays showed he tripped over his own feet! The free kick was played to the unmarked Sheaf but he made a mess of the shot and pulled it wide via a United defender.



The Blades had been unable to get out and from the corner, the leveller came. Souttar lost his man again and THOMAS was completely unmarked to power his header home. The game was back level and now the home side sensed, with their man advantage, that they could go on and win it.



The Blades had not really mounted an attack of note and it was one way traffic now with Souza gamely playing on, despite going down twice and holding his groin. The game ticked into the final moments and Cooper was taking his time but there was to be 7 minutes of stoppage time. Rudoni had a header saved from Cooper and United were trying to see it out but Coventry kept coming and the game ticked into the 99th minute before the final whistle saw the Blades get out with a point.
 

United – Before the game I would have took a point and at the end was delighted with it. We led twice but even at 11 v 11, we were second best. I think if Anel stays on, we maybe regroup, tweak things and with how dangerous we were on the break, may go on to win the game as they were susceptible at the back but the red card changes it. We scored two very good goals but we were off it all over the field and a bit like Bristol City, just seemed slow to react to things, sat off and sat way too deep. We were careless with the ball and the defence played the worst they have since the QPR game, conceding too much possession and leading to us being under pressure a lot. It was odd, as we scored two excellent goals and had a few other shots blocked but outside of 4 or 5 breaks, Coventry were the better side and it seemed like we had got out of jail to lead 1-2 at the break. I just wanted us to get closer to them and actually stop playing out from the back as much. We were being pressured all game and tried to be too clever but were poor with the ball and felt Coventry had more intensity than us and seemed really up for it. We looked flat I felt and they just seemed sharper. We just had that real quality on the attacks we did have and the two goals were superb. We seem to be able to get away with playing average and scrappy as we have those moments of quality and then defend well but today we were not defending well and making errors.



The red card was moronic from Anel. Yes, the guy caught him earlier (think it would be extremely hard for officials to clearly say that was a genuine attempt to elbow him – he did in my opinion but he was subtle and snidey). After this he has a go at Anel and riles him and a little touch but Anel cannot react like that. The players holds his face and a poor reaction but the minute you put your hand round his neck (not face as he held) then he is in trouble. The surrounding of the players all around the incident means that it was always going to be a red card. I do wonder why we did not do the same last week (or more of it) on the Bannon foul as think he may have gone?



I was fuming with Anel. Yes, their player behaved poorly and a total wind up/diver but we should not fall for it as Wilder said. We have to be better than that and he has cost us the chance of winning that game and maybe some others – now being out for three.



After this, we took Campbell off and I was surprised but seems he was injured and not sure he could trust One for a full half – especially with ten men. Rak Sakyi I would have left on as he had some pace at least – maybe he was injured too? It was always going to be hard but I thought out approach (forced due to personnel a fair bit) meant we were always going to concede as we just sat back and invited pressure. It was frustrating though as they did not do much despite having lots of the ball but then had a flurry of good chances but the goal is just basic defending. After that I thought they would go on and win but only really had one chance. We looked out on our feet at the end and a number were holding various body parts!



As I say a good point and a lot will be made of the Anel red card which was a huge turning point but I also think we were not great from the off. It was a messy performance, which I thought it was at Bristol City too and we got away with it. We have took 4 points from two games where we have arguably been second best – so that is a positive in terms of our resilience but also a concern as we cannot keep going like that and expect to keep picking up the points. I suppose the defence won’t be (they haven’t so far) be as poor as that. In the end we take the draw and move on but we have a really threadbare squad with games coming thick and fast. There is still 7 games I think till the window opens and we need to somehow get through these and hope to remain in the mix but we literally have no senior strikers at all and no indication of when Brewster and Moore may be back. We are limited in midfield too. I though Peck and O’Hare offered little today but Souza was superb as was Hamer in terms of quality on the ball to along with a good work rate. Too many were off it today though even before the red card and we need to get back to better standards. We have sort of got away with it with three quite ordinary performances but got 7 points but we were a long way off the comfort of the wins at Blackburn and against Stoke.





Ratings:



Cooper 8/10 – He made 2 or 3 really good saves including the one from the header at the end of the first half which was superb. He made a few other point-blank ones too. Little chance on the goals. His kicking was strangely poor though today and sliced a lot in to the air or out. Big factor in us getting a point.



Gilchrist 5/10 – Might have been the best of the defence that started and he was average. Gave his man way too much time and has this annoying habit of allowing players to turn him and face him up. Did do well second half to put off a player as a ball came across for a header. His limited play on the ball means we do not get much going the other way. Ended up centre back but not sure he attacked the ball enough when he was there.



Burrows 4.5/10 – He had a dip today with some mistakes throughout and give aways or poor clearances. Also lost his head, like Anel, when he reacted to the dive. Came off maybe to stop him getting into more trouble. Only saw him get forward once. Careless with the ball but Anel/Souza gave him some horrid passes.



Ahmedhodzic 1.5/10 – Hard to not give him any more. He had one good run out but his afternoon was a nightmare. Gave the ball away constantly, struggled when pressurised, daft free kicks conceded and then completely lost his head which cost us the chance of winning the game and his services for three games. Should get a maximum fine. Absolute idiot and as an experienced pro has to do far better at keeping his head. Totally rash and unprofessional. I get he had been wound up and caught but he has to manage his emotions. Wilder rightly called him out at the end. Big blow losing him for 3 games.



Souttar 3/10 – His worst performance for us. Constantly gave it away and also missed the cross on the first and then on the second he completely lost his man. Felt he never got to grips with the game and he just seemed really sluggish – maybe all the travelling he has been through has not helped. Looked clumsy and slow and did not dominate like he has been. They pressured both defenders all game and we kept coughing up possession.



Souza 7.5/10 – Our best outfield player just for his contribution over the game even though Hamer and Rak Sakyi was influential first half. Got up and down the field, won tackles and was able to pick up loose bits. He ensured we kept fighting and scrapping and used the ball better than anyone in the backline/defensive area.



Peck 4.5/10 – His play this season has gone from some excellent showings and then some largely anonymous ones and today was the latter. Barely saw him today and we needed much more especially when we had 10 men. I do think there is a big drop off from Arblaster who gets on the ball more and shows for it more and can turn out of those tight situations. Peck is young and we cannot expect him to play well every week – I expect Davies may get a start in the next few games.



Rak Sakyi 7.5/10 – A threat when we broke and he put in a great ball for the first goal and then the second made look easy when it was far from that. He is a real threat and teams look worried when he gets it. We need to get the ball to him more and let him run. I would have kept him on unless he had a knock? He is a dangerous player and an assist/goal from limited time on the ball/service is a great impact.



O’Hare 4/10 – Flattered to deceive again. Does work hard and tries to get on bits and pieces and had one shot blocked but he is weak/gets knocked off the ball and we are seeing little really of those marauding runs or dribbles. He just seems to get moved off it and is so lightweight and quite slow too. He does some of the defensive stuff well but I thought we were getting a dangerous attacker who could create/score, not just a worker off the ball and that is what he currently is? I think he needs a rest but we have so limited options he may have to keep playing.



Hamer 7.5/10 – Excellent in terms of the ball for the first goal, the ball for the second and always looking to get on it and make things happen. His work rate was good too. He showed real class when he got on it. Needs to be moved more centrally for me as he again is feeding off scraps. He was not able to influence the game as much second half and faded and then came off with another knock. Worrying he cannot last full games.



Campbell 6/10 – Hard one to mark as barely touched the ball and would be much lower if he did not score – but he did and a real poacher’s effort – where he got in front of his man and showed his instinct. On a good run and now may be out with an injury (hamstring according to Wilder?). Outside of the goal did little but we were playing more on the break. Hope he is not out for a long time.



Subs -



Seriki 6/10 – He at least stuck to his task with a few tackles and blocks but did get run past a few times with little cover behind. His play on the ball was neat enough other than a wild swing where he kicked it onto his own foot! Did ok though and once again did not let us down.



Robinson 6/10 – Thought he did well and won headers/tackles and helped us until the final 15 minutes to not be under too much pressure really. We then just though fatigue and weight of numbers started getting even deeper and the corners x 3 came and the goal. He did ok and now will need to step up for three games at least.



McCallum 5.5/10 – Ran around and won a few headers/clearances but we were under the cosh so he was just trying to plug gaps down the left.



Shackelton – Think he is extremely limited and is slow/small. He struggled to get up with the intensity of the game and seemed to be stuck in mud. Needed to give Seriki much more help who was left exposed. Needs to do more when given a chance as harsh as that sounds in difficult circumstances. Would worry me if he has to start many games.



One – Given little to really go at as we barely got in their half. Not sure he touched it much!





Manager: Wilder 5/10 – May seem harsh but thought we came out slow, off the pace and never got close to them and were under pressure from the off. The counter attacking was good and we scored two brilliant goals but did not see enough of the ball., defended way too deep and were overplaying. We were taking too many chances and kept conceding corners/free kicks after cheap give aways. I think he would have changed it at the break (personnel and tactics as we had so little of the ball and were so far back) but then he must almost make 2 chances enforced as we had to change our approach. It must have annoyed him as yes they looked dangerous but felt we had more goals with Hamer/Rak Sakyi etc going at them and they would have had to have taken more chances too. His interview after the game was excellent and summed it up really well with digs at the Coventry players for trying (why they did not play like that under Robins) and the striker but also was critical of our defending and of course, Anel. It was quite measured but you could not disagree with everything he said. He must be frustrated with the personnel he was left with and the fact we could not bring in 2 or 3 more in midfield/attack before the window closed and it will be a bit of a struggle for bodies up to January but even then there is no guarantee we will bring anyone in with the side (could use a different word) off the pitch. I think we will see likes of Shackleton, McCallum, Brooks in the week and we might find it a harder game than it should be – but eyes will be on Sunderland and the fact we have three games in a week too.





Coventry – I had them to finish 3rd which now seems mad but still think they will be around the playoffs if they get the managerial change right. Talk of Lampard would not fill me with confidence at all if I was a Sky Blues fan. Robins sacking was ridiculous and shows if you do well, you almost push the expectation levels up. He did such a great job, in difficult circumstances and brought in some excellent players. On a limited budget, he got them in or into the playoffs and nearly into an FA Cup final. I do wonder why clubs still go for these big-name managers like Rooney, Gerrard and Lampard. We saw it a while ago when the likes of Waddle, Robson and Barnes etc tried their hand at management. I get it to some degree for smaller clubs like Plymouth as it can then attract players who would not normally come but Coventry could get an up and coming manager or one of the European ones as is the current trend (worked for some and less so for others). I think if Robins had stayed they would have pushed toward the top 6 despite a poor start but now not so sure – if the appointment is as expected?



The team they have put together has some real talent, even with the losses they have had like Gyokeres (now one of the best strikers in Europe and one I wish we had pursued when we went up!), Hamer and O’Hare. I like Simms and Wright and have some underrated players all round but they seemingly have never got going this season and every time they got a win, it normally saw a few losses and could not push on after the rise of the last few seasons.



Today, they played well. They were the better side and will be aggrieved not to win but did come back from being behind twice. I suppose it is not the worst result but the way they played and the way the game went with the red card, they will feel they could and should have won it. The stats in terms of possession, touches (most they had had in an opposition box all season) and chances they had over the game and will have thought they should have scored more goals. They have some decent players and as Wilder said, wonder why they played as they have done the last few since Robins went? All their attacking subs would be in our match day squad so shows they probably have better depth than us. Today they sort of zoomed all over us and pressed high and forced our normally solid defence into mistakes. They scored two goals from good crosses and missed some chances. They were the better and more aggressive side throughout but their defending was awful and we could have scored from every attack we had (did not have many!) as they got down with slick passing and counter attacking. For all their control, they surrender goals too cheaply. The shenanigans they showed needs calling out – the diving from the lad Bassette and the errant elbow and then the holding his face- along with Thomas Asante cheating too was poor. Yes Anel was stupid and right to go off but the strikers’ behaviour was poor. Did not need to behave like he did, as he was a handful and threat without that. They have some real talent in reserve and do expect them to move up the league, even with Lampard but the start has not helped them. They are a side that always seems to cause us problems and we have had dreadful defensive showings in our last few games against them with players often (Egan recall last time) picking the games at the CBS to have their worst showings of the season. Maybe they deserve credit as pressured us and closed us down. We were slow to react but the red of course makes it a game that is about us trying to hold on and they deserved the leveller after a flurry of efforts but could not create too much after that.





Opponent Man of the Match – Bassette was the most influential, even as an irritant but they were decent throughout and thought Rudoni and Torp won midfield and had all the ball. They have some tidy players. Thomas rightly got the man of the match as he made two crucial blocks and scored the leveller – so he takes this award as I agree with Sky – I often don’t. Sakamoto was a handful when he came on too though.



Opponent Weak link – Not sure anyone was awful but did not think Sheaf was that influential and Thomas Asante made some odd decisions (dive and miskick – went too early on the goal too).



Referee/Officials – Darren Bond. The former alice band wearer, Bond looks a little less flashy these days. He has had some poor games involving us but you often remember the bad ones and our record under him has been good – sure he has been fine in many games too! Today he sort of lost control at times but not sure the players from either side helped and think they deserve more blame than him. The red he sort of has no choice as a raised hand to the throat by Anel gives him the opportunity to send him off. I think the striker could have walked or at least been booked (then he goes too) for the elbow but was subtle and probably hard for him to spot – the assistant has to help him but proving he did it on purpose is tricky for them to call – I certainly think he did! The rest of the game was bitty at times and both teams were losing their discipline. Sure a lot will be made of what he could have done differently but Wilder rightly called out their lad – Bond would have been a brave man to send him off for rolling around and sadly not many do. The rest of the game saw a few flashpoints and he tried to calm things down but as I say, I might be in the minority but thought both teams were not helping throwing themselves to the floor (mainly them but Souza and a few of ours did it too to timewaste) and too much pushing shoving. Players need to play the game.
 
5 out of 10 for Wilder seems a little bit harsh. We were 2 1 up in a tricky away game, with injuries to a couple of key players. Anel then gets sent off, Campbell comes off injured and we play nearly 60 minutes with ten man and still come away with a point (would have been 3 had we not switched off).

Keep 11 men on the pitch and we would have won.

Managers shouldn't be scored aesthetics in my opinion
 
think those 7.5s are generous. Souza constantly gave the ball away under no pressure on at least 4/5 occasions.

Ohare: 3
Hamer: 6
Souza: 6
Wilder: 4
 
5 out of 10 for Wilder seems a little bit harsh. We were 2 1 up in a tricky away game, with injuries to a couple of key players. Anel then gets sent off, Campbell comes off injured and we play nearly 60 minutes with ten man and still come away with a point (would have been 3 had we not switched off).

Keep 11 men on the pitch and we would have won.

Managers shouldn't be scored aesthetics in my opinion

I thought we were poor from the off though. They were the better team even when we led. Maybe we would have won but we were so deep and tactucally thought it was an odd approach.
 
Harsh on Peck who never stopped running till the end. Fair assessment apart from that.
I barely saw Peck on the ball and thought he was way off his man all game. I like him but he is very up and down which you expect with a young lad.

His game is all about energy but not sure he was pressing/tackling like normal and they had so much of the ball even first half.
 
Honestly don’t see why we brought Shackleton in, can’t see what he offers, O’Hare bit of a meh addition also. Built a decent defence but the issue and its been for a good while is we can’t seem to build an exciting offence like other teams (boro,Leeds, even cov?)
 
Cooper 7

Burrows 3
Anel 0
Souttar 3
Gilchrist 3

Souza 7
Peck 6
JRS 6
Hamer 7

O’Hare 3

Campbell 6

Subs

JLT. 6
Seriki 3
mccallum 4
One’ 3
Sackleton 2

Wilder 7

Referee Cunt.
 
I thought we were poor from the off though. They were the better team even when we led. Maybe we would have won but we were so deep and tactucally thought it was an odd approach.
I think when you're down to 10 men and your only option up front is an 18 year old who's barely played any 1st football, then dropping deep is inevitable.

Besides, there nowt wrong with dropping deep. Some people see it seen as some sort of dirty footballing evil, but there's been some very successful sides do it very effectively
 
I think when you're down to 10 men and your only option up front is an 18 year old who's barely played any 1st football, then dropping deep is inevitable.

Besides, there nowt wrong with dropping deep. Some people see it seen as some sort of dirty footballing evil, but there's been some very successful sides do it very effectively
I meant we were deep from the off. We invited pressure from the start. Even before the red.
 
Honestly don’t see why we brought Shackleton in, can’t see what he offers, O’Hare bit of a meh addition also. Built a decent defence but the issue and its been for a good while is we can’t seem to build an exciting offence like other teams (boro,Leeds, even cov?)
Yeah Shackleton is such an ordinary player. He's like a shitter Osborn. Surely there was better to be had in the free agent market or just keep Osborn?
 

Yeah Shackleton is such an ordinary player. He's like a shitter Osborn. Surely there was better to be had in the free agent market or just keep Osborn?

Harsh on Shackleton. He's had such limited minutes, I think it's unfair to judge.
We knew he was a "do a job" type player. If we need him for a run of games, I'm sure he'll step up and be OK. No better than that, but hopefully no worse.
 
Agree Deadbat, I thought they were the better team in the first half and we did really well to go in 2-1 up as apart from our goals ( both of which were very well worked and clinically finished) they had all the possession and pulled us all over the place.

We did extremely well to take a point as second half we barely got out of our half and they had a number of chances that they should have buried.

Top away point and symptomatic of one that teams that go up take.
 
International break not our best friend. Lost two last time out. More worrying a few with various injurysigns today.
 
Thought it was just me on Peck today, anonymous .

Coventry got a tremendous amount of crosses into the box,from both sides and open play,both our full backs and their replacements hardly got a tackle in
 
Last edited:
Cooper 7
Gilchrist 6
Soutter 5
Anel 0
Burrows 5
Souza 7
Peck 4
Rak S 7
Campbell 6
O’Hare 3
Hamer 5.5


Wilder 3.5

Ref 7

Subs meh

Prince - pls go
 
Like Deadbat looking at SISU players I thought they would be higher in the league. Rudoni was a steal from Uddersfield. Yet consistent with their history of cheating they continue not to disappoint. Yes Anel was stupid but the blatant face holding was pathetic and was rightly called out by CW.

Disappointing game for Souttar at fault for both goals but the clash of heads for Australia and travelling long distance seems to have caught up with him. Hopefully resting for the next few days will get him back to his faultless performances to date. At least he's not going away now on international duty until March.

To be fair to SISU their high pressing game caused us problems and we struggled to adapt all game. As for us surrounding the ref to try and get an oppo player sent off, not for me we're better than the likes of SISU. Not for the manager either as referenced in post match comments. We've already run up a fair bill in confrontations this season, anymore and we'll have to pass the hat round to help pay for them.

CW said he felt if we'd gone for it second half they would have over run us. Hard to judge because we went into defensive mode straight away but I suspect Campbell's tight hamstring and the fact he was only down to play 60 minutes was an influencing factor. We will experience games like this where we are off it and a draw in the light of all that went off was a point gained not 2 lost. The concern is mounting injuries and the paper thin squad. Agree about Shackleton. Like all SUFC players I want him to do well but so far he looks well off the pace, lacks physicality and awareness of whats going on around him.

Time to regroup. Anel will be a loss but reverting to 3 at the back will be a backward step as shown by the Weeds experience. JLT/Norrington Davies need to step up next few matches.
 
Keep 11 men on the pitch and we would have won.
Seriously?

2 decent chances all game. 2 shots on target. 2 goals. Once Hamer went off there was no threat going forward. Not what you expect from a side top of the table.

Blame the red card? Not a lot changed after it.
 
Harsh on Shackleton. He's had such limited minutes, I think it's unfair to judge.
We knew he was a "do a job" type player. If we need him for a run of games, I'm sure he'll step up and be OK. No better than that, but hopefully no worse.

I expected him to offer energy though or get a few tackles in when he comes on. I'm not sure what his strengths are at all?
 
Seriously?

2 decent chances all game. 2 shots on target. 2 goals. Once Hamer went off there was no threat going forward. Not what you expect from a side top of the table.

Blame the red card? Not a lot changed after it.
Yet, here we are joint top. We were off it today but still scored two lovely goals and led before the red. Our player lost his head but the striker could have walked for an intentional elbow which he was sly and knew what he was doing.

I'd be more concerned about your sides position and non performances over the course of the season,as Wilder rightly alluded to.

There's a reason we are at the top and you are nearer the bottom. It's more than about today.
 
Seriously?

2 decent chances all game. 2 shots on target. 2 goals. Once Hamer went off there was no threat going forward. Not what you expect from a side top of the table.

Blame the red card? Not a lot changed after it.
I’d say we had 4 decent chances in the first half (Hamer and O’Hare). Our xG was higher before the red. Can’t deny that you totally dominated until the first goal.
 
Seriously?

2 decent chances all game. 2 shots on target. 2 goals. Once Hamer went off there was no threat going forward. Not what you expect from a side top of the table.

Blame the red card? Not a lot changed after it.
United have been doing that to teams all season. Create a chance, score a goal, then see it out. It's not sexy,.it'a not glamorous, but it's been very very effective so far and got us to the top of the division.

So seriously, yes we would have won and you would probably have been on this forum saying we were lucky
 
A few observations from the stats:

- we have played far fewer "Long Balls" in the last two matches - which is clearly intentional as Campbell (for all his goal scoring prowess) simply can't hold the ball up like Moore could. This has resulted in our tactics becoming one dimensional and predictable, as we always play short, with increased pressure and more lost balls in our own third. They had five players with pass completion over 90%, we had none;

- Vini remains a god! Most passes (save for Cooper), highest pass completion rate (89%). most tackles, joint most interceptions, joint most blocks, and even most successful dribbles! He also didn't commit a foul, - and when he was clearly struggling in the last 10 mins, he still put his body on the line. Peck's defensive stats were ok e.g second most tackles, but his pass completion rate and successful pass numbers are significantly lower than Vinis (and Arbs - a very sad loss!);

- Rak-Saki headlines offensively with most shots, most key passes, joint most successful crosses, and third best pass completion rate (unusual for an attacking winger). Hamer's contributed strongly with both goals, although O'Hare with no key passes, no dribbles, no tackles etc remains an enigma;

- Defensively, although Souttar won joint most aerial duels (with 4) this is far lower than normal, and perhaps he was jet lagged! Burrows again has most crosses, joint second most shots, third most successful tackles etc and remains a very consistent performer up and down the left;
 
A few observations from the stats:

- we have played far fewer "Long Balls" in the last two matches - which is clearly intentional as Campbell (for all his goal scoring prowess) simply can't hold the ball up like Moore could. This has resulted in our tactics becoming one dimensional and predictable, as we always play short, with increased pressure and more lost balls in our own third. They had five players with pass completion over 90%, we had none;

- Vini remains a god! Most passes (save for Cooper), highest pass completion rate (89%). most tackles, joint most interceptions, joint most blocks, and even most successful dribbles! He also didn't commit a foul, - and when he was clearly struggling in the last 10 mins, he still put his body on the line. Peck's defensive stats were ok e.g second most tackles, but his pass completion rate and successful pass numbers are significantly lower than Vinis (and Arbs - a very sad loss!);

- Rak-Saki headlines offensively with most shots, most key passes, joint most successful crosses, and third best pass completion rate (unusual for an attacking winger). Hamer's contributed strongly with both goals, although O'Hare with no key passes, no dribbles, no tackles etc remains an enigma;

- Defensively, although Souttar won joint most aerial duels (with 4) this is far lower than normal, and perhaps he was jet lagged! Burrows again has most crosses, joint second most shots, third most successful tackles etc and remains a very consistent performer up and down the left;

For clarity, are these stats in relation to Blades & Coventry players or just our own?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom