Coutts FA probe

[Boxer Blade]

How much? Seen em on e Bay at a fiver each

 

[Sean Thornton]

How much? Seen em on e Bay at a fiver each

Theyre BADLY unicorns. Won't even last in the post. Charlatans.

 

[Boxer Blade]

Theyre BADLY unicorns. Won't even last in the post. Charlatans.

I could collect if the price is right

 

[HodgysBrokenThumb]

October will be fine. Send me a copy of the paper every day that month. I'll pay, of course, not being a freeloader. I'm not having the issue decided by the office tea boy.

It's not nonsense; the bias is patent, as any empirical analysis will confirm, unless of course you tip the sub-editor off, which wouldn't surprise me in the least.

I speak, by the way, from over fifty years experience, which you might, on reflection, not dismiss so lightly.

Biggs is a third-rater, at best. That's why he ghost writes for Lee 'Who?' Bullen. Lee fucking Bullen.

Ask your mate about his commentary for RS on the Crewe-Doncaster game. I had the misfortune to hear it whilst watching some paint dry. It was excruciatingly poor.

You should be able to paint better at your age.

 

[Sean Thornton]

I could collect if the price is right

You're going to feed them to your gryphon aren't you?

 

[Boxer Blade]

You're going to feed them to your gryphon aren't you?

I would have done but my minataur fuckin ate im.

 

[sheffielder]

He and his family are Chesterfield fans

His Sheffield club preference Silent

 

[Silent Blade]

View attachment 31031

We don't do trainings on Wednesdays unless there is a match that evening!

 

['Doc' Pace my hero]

There always was 'reasonable doubt',so the decision is absolutely correct.

 

[sheffielder]

Seen some bollocks on here but Jesus, that's up there.

Not lucky at all ,unlucky some twat decided to bring it up.

After he probably knew it had come to nothing

 

[Whiston Blade]

Mwahahahahaha.

Bad joke. Sorry.

Fucking hell, my heart sank

 

[Slim Man]

LUCKY???
He's been investigated for a cheat pretending to be hurt (he wasn't, as his getting back up when he wasn't getting Coutts into trouble proves) after a bit of contact.
It's a contact sport, pretending to be hurt is NOT part of it.

Yes. Lucky.

A flailing arm to the face is plenty enough to get a retrospective ban these days whether you like it or not.

Look at the reactions on this thread after Foxy put the clip up... everyone was saying it was a certainty he’d be getting banned

 

[Sean Thornton]

Yes. Lucky.

A flailing arm to the face is plenty enough to get a retrospective ban these days whether you like it or not.

Look at the reactions on this thread after Foxy put the clip up... everyone was saying it was a certainty he’d be getting banned

Not everyone Danny. Twenty yards away in real time it didn't look half as bad.

Half the comments were about the wrong incident, which looked worse (and which I missed on Saturday) to start with.

 

[Bladesman]

View attachment 31031

Probably because the Norwich player dragged their foot down the back of his leg.

 

[Fulwood Blade]

Yes. Lucky.

A flailing arm to the face is plenty enough to get a retrospective ban these days whether you like it or not.

Look at the reactions on this thread after Foxy put the clip up... everyone was saying it was a certainty he’d be getting banned

Sorry, not everyone - some thought so. As for your "everyone" comment - would you care to offer an explanation as to why the 3 footballing experts who looked at it thought differently to the "everyone" that thought he would certainly get banned?

In conclusion, it's a good job our fans aren't on any decision making panel.

UTB

 

[The Crab]

Theyre BADLY unicorns. Won't even last in the post. Charlatans.

They are getting sent from China to be fair, no wonder they're badly.

 

[Grecian2000]

Yes. Lucky.

A flailing arm to the face is plenty enough to get a retrospective ban these days whether you like it or not.

Look at the reactions on this thread after Foxy put the clip up... everyone was saying it was a certainty he’d be getting banned

We'll have to agree to disagree then.
Saw the video clip and it's never a red card on this earth, even in today's girls game that we seem to have taken on. As a red card is all you can get a retro for then I am happy he got justice and wasn't "lucky".

 

[TomHeffernan]

Full strength against the pigs it seems. Jesus I've got a boner bigger than a lion. Can't wait

 

[itsinyerblood]

Yes. Lucky.

A flailing arm to the face is plenty enough to get a retrospective ban these days whether you like it or not.

Look at the reactions on this thread after Foxy put the clip up... everyone was saying it was a certainty he’d be getting banned

Got to agree with Sean Thornton and Fulwood Blade danny. Just because a few posters agreed or appeared to agree, well it doesn't stand as a majority decision, let alone a unanimous choice.

Personally I'm delighted Coutts is back and able to play, I bet Wilder feels exactly the same way (as I'm sure you do deep down, go on, you know you do!).

Now all we have to do is learn how to contain our curiosity about who else is fit for selection.....good thing we have Wilder in charge, he'll take this right to the wire..........it'll be one game where the players won't need motivating, Billy will have sown the seed of attrition and we'll get the balance between playing great football and Custer's last stand just about right. No quarter given or asked! UTMB!

 

[BushBlade]

Sorry, not everyone - some thought so. As for your "everyone" comment - would you care to offer an explanation as to why the 3 footballing experts who looked at it thought differently to the "everyone" that thought he would certainly get banned?

In conclusion, it's a good job our fans aren't on any decision making panel.

UTB

Can I offer an explanation? It's because in the week before a derby game three quarters of the posters on here turn into neurotic little girls.

If the Third World War was announced in five minutes I can guarantee the first post on here about it would be 'does this mean the derby is cancelled?'

 

[LoughboroBlade]

Sorry, not everyone - some thought so. As for your "everyone" comment - would you care to offer an explanation as to why the 3 footballing experts who looked at it thought differently to the "everyone" that thought he would certainly get banned?

In conclusion, it's a good job our fans aren't on any decision making panel.

UTB

We don't actually know if all 3 did think it wasn't worthy of a red to be fair – as it's a unanimous decision needed a majority of them might have thought it was.

All I can say in seeing it is that I've seen players of ours sent off for less in similar instances where there's been an arm/hand to face.

But who cares ultimately – I am delighted if not surprised that he's available on Sunday!

 

[BushBlade]

We don't actually know if all 3 did think it wasn't worthy of a red to be fair – as it's a unanimous decision needed a majority of them might have thought it was.

All I can say in seeing it is that I've seen players of ours sent off for less in similar instances where there's been an arm/hand to face.

But who cares ultimately – I am delighted if not surprised that he's available on Sunday!

sorry, run that by me again.

 

[Esablade]

Always knew he'd be reyt...just need him to bang in the winning goal and watch t'pigs scream how 'he shouldn't even have been playing'



UTB!

 

[LoughboroBlade]

sorry, run that by me again.

All three would have to agree it was worthy of a red card offence. So all we needed was one of the panel to have said it wasn't.

 

[BushBlade]

All three would have to agree it was worthy of a red card offence. So all we needed was one of the panel to have said it wasn't.

Ah, got you.

Maybe all three thought it was a red but one of them was Adkins and no one was sure what he was on about and just gave up.

 

[stringer]

It's not nonsense; the bias is patent, as any empirical analysis will confirm, unless of course you tip the sub-editor off, which wouldn't surprise me in the least.

'I know I'll be right! But if I'm not, it's because you cooked the books!'

 

[stringer]

October will be fine. Send me a copy of the paper every day that month. I'll pay, of course, not being a freeloader.

Available in all good newsagents. I'm too busy making tea to do your work for you.

I speak, by the way, from over fifty years experience, which you might, on reflection, not dismiss so lightly.

You have 50 years experience in journalism and newspapers? Great effort!

 

[Slim Man]

Sorry, not everyone - some thought so. As for your "everyone" comment - would you care to offer an explanation as to why the 3 footballing experts who looked at it thought differently to the "everyone" that thought he would certainly get banned?

In conclusion, it's a good job our fans aren't on any decision making panel.

UTB

I personally wouldn't say it was an incident that was worth a ban but with the FA as harsh as they are, often when it comes to us, it wasn't beyond the realms of possibility that it would be a 3 gamer and it seems most people on this thread at the time went along with that.

A flailing arm which can be seen as an elbow is often a very easy one for the FA to act on, especially considering the ref hadn't seen it (like nearly everything else in that game)

 

[super_pig]

didn't think we trained wednesdays.. could be wrong

 

[Mesut Özil's Lawnmower]

Always knew he'd be reyt...just need him to bang in the winning goal and watch t'pigs scream how 'he shouldn't even have been playing'



UTB!

While that would be satisfying, Billy is bagging the winner in the 95th minute for scenes galore