Whilst I think there is some merit in what you say i think your examples are poor. If we had signed those 4 instead of what we did we would still be down but we wouldn't have a squad. We have paid the fees we did for the others as an investment in their future. Signing players we expect to be with us for a long time. Signing big name crocks on short term deals wouldn't save us or build a more capable squad down the line.
I definitely think GK wise we could have saved alot of cash but I understand the logic in investing long term in our forward line whilst we have the funds to do it. When we go down would we have the money to buy a whole new forward line given mcgoldrick, Sharp, welbeck and starring would probably be done/injured/ too expensive?