Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Maybe its a double bluff? All part of a cunning planShould he be posting this kind of stuff on Twitter?
Adkin's normally plays his cards close to his chest re: team selection...
That's no excuse. Were you not aware that the average age of a combat soldier in Vietnam was 19?Woolford is more than good enough to play.
Would like to see Che given a little rest now anyway, he's just played two games in a week and was quiet before that for us.
We need to remember he's only 19 still, this is why relying on just him to replace Murphy was always going to be a stupid move. Good job we have players ready waiting for a chance.
Maybe its a double bluff? All part of a cunning plan
That's no excuse. Were you not aware that the average age of a combat soldier in Vietnam was 19?
![]()
a plan so cunning you could stick a tail on it and call it fox?
That's no excuse. Were you not aware that the average age of a combat soldier in Vietnam was 19?
![]()
N-N-N-No I wasn't. F-F-F-Fascinating.That's no excuse. Were you not aware that the average age of a combat soldier in Vietnam was 19?
![]()
And that went sooo well ...That's no excuse. Were you not aware that the average age of a combat soldier in Vietnam was 19?
![]()
I wouldn't go as far to say i'd start him infront of Adams if he was fit but there's no problem with Woolford starting any game, he's influenced many games already this season and will play an integral part this season for us.No idea why anyone wouldn't want Woolford to start.
Personally I'd start him even if Adams was fit.
And we have people saying 2 games a week is a bit much whilst collecting ?k per week, it is utterly outrageous!
I wonder if Adams has failed a drugs test. Isn't 'virus' or 'illness' what Jose Baxter had last year for the play off semi?
The massive advancements made in the application of sports science to football have lead to modern footballers being finely tuned athletes and an understanding of the need to allow sufficient recovery time between games to permit continued performance at peak conditioning.Doesn't this miss the point?
And the wages are irrelevant to the issue.
It's about fitness relative to the opposition. The margins in almost any professional game of football are actually quite tight: if a player is playing repeatedly without rest then it is likely they will either have some kind of knock (even minor) which will take the edge off their game, or they will tire relative to the opposition later in the game, or even - given levels of concentration required in some games - they may switch off at an important moment.
Of course they are capable of playing Saturday, Tuesday, Saturday.
Are they capable of playing at or near their best for the whole of each of those games and not being susceptible to injuries? It'll be different for each player but generally I imagine someone who can would be an exception.
And none of them was really sure what was going on.Yeah but none of them received an heroes welcome. None of them. None of them.
You think he might be impotent? Like our defence?I am surprised a (super fit?) 19 year old pro footballer has managed to miss 3 games with a virus and with no sign of a return. Considering the way footballers are looked after these days I think that is a bit odd.
Generic injury titles like 'virus' or 'illness' are often used to cover up things like: depression; failed drug test; family problems; mens health issues.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?