Player Suggestion Charlie Hughes

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Screenshot_20250805_135621_Chrome.webp

Sounds like this was early doors, ie not as a Anel replacement. Now we have more money and a greater need. Plus, we already know their valuation.
 
Would they sell him, on the knowledge they could only replace via the somewhat sparse free transfer pool?

I mean, there’s a couple of centre halves that are passable but it’s becoming an ever decreasing pool.
I imagine there owner will be a nightmare to deal with, even if Hughes agitates for a move.

£5m + add ons would be a good fee for them, with the trouble their in they need the cash.
 
If they're throwing £30k/week at McBurnie how real are those financial problems?
I don’t know the details but aren’t they under an embargo/have to run all signings by the EFL?

There’s a couple of ‘ull fans at work, their description of their owner varies from ‘unpredictable’ to ‘bonkers’.
 
So if we got 7m for Anel it wouldn't be unreasonable for them to want at least that for their CB who is on a long term contract. Additionally it wouldn't be unreasonable for our fan base to expect our new owners to spend that 7m on Hughes if Selles wants him.....would it?

If they won't or cant reinvest that money on a long term CB we will be getting an early indication on the financial wherewithal of our new owners given we only 'own' one CB with any championship experience.
 
So if we got 7m for Anel it wouldn't be unreasonable for them to want at least that for their CB who is on a long term contract. Additionally it wouldn't be unreasonable for our fan base to expect our new owners to spend that 7m on Hughes if Selles...would it?

If they won't or cant reinvest that money on a long term CB we will be getting an early indication on the financial wherewithal of our new owners given we only 'own' one CB with any championship experience.
They sold Jacob Greaves for 15 mill rising to 18 mill. I fail to see how they’d willingly take less for Hughes. Which is clearly out of our range
 

View attachment 218318

Sounds like this was early doors, ie not as a Anel replacement. Now we have more money and a greater need. Plus, we already know their valuation.
It seems having the money, and spending it, are 2 very different things with these owners.....unless your a Bulgarian youth obviously.
 
View attachment 218318

Sounds like this was early doors, ie not as a Anel replacement. Now we have more money and a greater need. Plus, we already know their valuation.

Do we have more money?
I mean more money to actually spend?
To date no sign of releasing the purse strings

Let’s hope our esteemed owners now show a little ambition. It’s not like we don’t need a few defenders in is it? KO 4 days away

UTB
 
Do we have more money?
I mean more money to actually spend?
To date no sign of releasing the purse strings

Let’s hope our esteemed owners now show a little ambition. It’s not like we don’t need a few defenders in is it? KO 4 days away

UTB

Weerz moneh?
 
Do we have more money?
I mean more money to actually spend?
To date no sign of releasing the purse strings

Let’s hope our esteemed owners now show a little ambition. It’s not like we don’t need a few defenders in is it? KO 4 days away

UTB
Showed ambition for a player we didn’t need (Cannon £10m) but are they flush enough to buy a player we desperately need?
 
Hughes won Young Player of the Year at Hull ,, their CB who won Player of the Month for April , helping keep them in the division was John Egan ( do they work well together ??)
 

Did I say I wanted us to buy Hughes????
Ever!???

Obviously one thing that isn't brilliant, is your reading skills.
“It seems having the money, and spending it, are 2 very different things with these owners”

You indicate you want the owners to spend, in reply to an article about us not spending on Charlie Hughes. I deeply apologise if I’ve mistakenly connected the two
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom