Brooks to Man Utd?

[Benji]

I'm not usually one to read or trust what this organisation publish, but I stumbled upon this and it got me wondering, will we see any benefit if this was to happen?

 

[bromtom]

View attachment 55574

I'm not usually one to read or trust what this organisation publish, but I stumbled upon this and it got me wondering, will we see any benefit if this was to happen?

Yeah a huge wedge of cash.

We've got a bumper sell on with Brooks, if he goes for £50m or something even dafter that's a good striker fee coming to us.

 

[wavy-blade]

Don't get me started on Brooks again ffs

 

[ChipButtyBlade]

When the big clubs come calling.

 

[Tom Bott]

We got promoted to the PL..

Why the angst.

 

[Tunstall Fred]

We got promoted to the PL..

Why the angst.

It's another means of having a whinge and moan about United .

 

[WoodMillBlade]

Here we go again.

 

[mancunianblade]

It would seem to be in line with their recruitment plans so far

 

[Blade58]

I've forgot. Whats the sell on clause? Is it £20% ?

 

[Tunstall Fred]

I've forgot. Whats the sell on clause? Is it £20% ?

Straight in McCabe's back pocket

 

[Oldun]

Nick Cox at Man U

 

[Blade56]

Yeah a huge wedge of cash.

And Bournemouth get a much bigger wedge to snap up players we are interested in, always the bridesmaid when you’ve got owners with no disposable wealth to risk.

 

[SouthEssexBlade]

If he goes for that figure and we have a 20% sell-on clause that would give us about £7.5m.

Assuming the Adams deal had a similar sell-on that would be over £10m added to the kitty.

 

[43.nm]

If he goes for that figure and we have a 20% sell-on clause that would give us about £7.5m.

Assuming the Adams deal had a similar sell-on that would be over £10m added to the kitty.

im not sure CW would get it all to spend

 

[SouthEssexBlade]

im not sure CW would get it all to spend

Possibly not all for transfer fees, but I reckon it would mostly go into the playing staff budget.

 

[43.nm]

i do hope so.

 

[super_pig]

classic agent move.. get your mate in the Sun/Mail whatever to say 'Man united are interested in..' if you believe this crap Man united are interested in everybody who wants to leave their club
i dont' understand all of the hand wringing about Brooks. fact is he couldn't get in our first 11 on a regular basis because he doesn't fit our style

 

[Blade56]

classic agent move.. get your mate in the Sun/Mail whatever to say 'Man united are interested in..' if you believe this crap Man united are interested in everybody who wants to leave their club

Villa are interested in buying Manure yhihf

 

[super_pig]

Villa are interested in buying Manure yhihf

their owner could afford it!

 

[Blade56]

their owner could afford it!

Ours couldn’t afford actual manure in bags

 

[FinchleyBlade]

Wouldn't surprise me at all, seems right in line with their transfer policy of going for young British talent. Brooks will be a bale-like star in a few years time.

 

[WoodMillBlade]

Wouldn't surprise me at all, seems right in line with their transfer policy of going for young British talent. Brooks will be a bale-like star in a few years time.

Still to some on here it was good business for us like maguire and the two Kyles.
Yet now in the promised land with a supposed £170 million coming in for being the prem we can’t afford to to sign anyone over 3 million.

Where did the money go and where will this new money go?

 

[Original United]

Still to some on here it was good business for us like maguire and the two Kyles.
Yet now in the promised land with a supposed £170 million coming in for being the prem we can’t afford to to sign anyone over 3 million.

Where did the money go and where will this new money go?

it was good business for us, if you read the court hearing notes it shows we had not got a pot to piss in. Wilder uses this to sign players and we go up. If we had kept Brooks and not given Wilder the money to make these signings I don't think we would have gone up.

 

[crucialkneeligaman]

View attachment 55574

I'm not usually one to read or trust what this organisation publish, but I stumbled upon this and it got me wondering, will we see any benefit if this was to happen?

Don't usually read Sun, Mail etc, that old chestnut...……...……..

 

[WoodMillBlade]

it was good business for us, if you read the court hearing notes it shows we had not got a pot to piss in. Wilder uses this to sign players and we go up. If we had kept Brooks and not given Wilder the money to make these signings I don't think we would have gone up.

Yep astonishing that our great new partner who would help transform Utd and was given half the club for a £1 had no money.

 

[Nick Jansky]

Yep astonishing that our great new partner who would help transform Utd and was given half the club for a £1 had no money.

He did have wealth, but most of it was in shares and property and his circumstances changed.

 

[Sean Thornton]

He did have wealth, but most of it was in shares and property and his circumstances changed.

And did put almost £17m into shares.

 

[BLADES1988]

Still to some on here it was good business for us like maguire and the two Kyles.
Yet now in the promised land with a supposed £170 million coming in for being the prem we can’t afford to to sign anyone over 3 million.

Where did the money go and where will this new money go?

WEEEEEERZMUNNEHGONE

 

[Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn]

Yep astonishing that our great new partner who would help transform Utd and was given half the club for a £1 had no money.

Aye, because the "half" he bought was worth a fortune at the time

 

[Flatulent_Bob]

Still to some on here it was good business for us like maguire and the two Kyles.
Yet now in the promised land with a supposed £170 million coming in for being the prem we can’t afford to to sign anyone over 3 million.

Where did the money go and where will this new money go?