Grizzly blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,629
- Reaction score
- 9,139
This club has been mentioned by one or two at the club over the last week or so. And with the debate over what type of transfer window we should have given our new prize money I had a little look at how they went about things.
Upon promotion to the prem, in their first season they brought in 11 and moved on 10 with a net spend of roughly £37m
9 were signed at the start of the season, while 2 (Afobe and Grabban) arrived in Jan for £18m.
They ultimately finished 16th, and without going too deep the impact of the two signings in Jan could be open to debate. But their net spend that summer was around £21m.
Now I realise that Sky money and player fees have gone up a fair bit since then but I’m sure that would only have been a fraction of what they brought in.
Those who can be bothered might have the time and the inclination to find that detail out.
After that,
Season 2- £12m net spend. 9 players in, 15 out. Finished 9th.
Season 3- £30m net spend, Finished 12th
Season 4- £35m Net spend, Finished 14th
The last two seasons saw them bring fewer players in but single fees jumped with them spending £20 m on a single player each season.
These figures are rough, some reported others undisclosed so some licence has been used. But this is a model I see United following quite closely. And what is interesting is that even though spending has gone up their league position hasn’t really, which perhaps highlights the point fees and money went up.
It’s going to be fun this summer
Upon promotion to the prem, in their first season they brought in 11 and moved on 10 with a net spend of roughly £37m
9 were signed at the start of the season, while 2 (Afobe and Grabban) arrived in Jan for £18m.
They ultimately finished 16th, and without going too deep the impact of the two signings in Jan could be open to debate. But their net spend that summer was around £21m.
Now I realise that Sky money and player fees have gone up a fair bit since then but I’m sure that would only have been a fraction of what they brought in.
Those who can be bothered might have the time and the inclination to find that detail out.
After that,
Season 2- £12m net spend. 9 players in, 15 out. Finished 9th.
Season 3- £30m net spend, Finished 12th
Season 4- £35m Net spend, Finished 14th
The last two seasons saw them bring fewer players in but single fees jumped with them spending £20 m on a single player each season.
These figures are rough, some reported others undisclosed so some licence has been used. But this is a model I see United following quite closely. And what is interesting is that even though spending has gone up their league position hasn’t really, which perhaps highlights the point fees and money went up.
It’s going to be fun this summer