A study published at the end of last month (
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53226508) showed a marked difference between the language used to describe the play and personal characteristics of players with lighter skin tones (intelligence, work ethic) and players with darker skin tones (pace, power, aggression). That simple football cliché is barely noticeable to those of us privileged enough for it not to affect us, but it isn't that much of a leap to suggest a link between language which doesn't recognise black players as intelligent and a lack of black players moving into roles such as management, where intelligence might be seen as a desirable characteristic.
I spotted that study. I wasn't sure that it demonstrated subconscious racism on the part of commentators and whether it demonstrated any relevance to the perceived lack of black managers in the top divisions. I thought maybe commentators were describing certain players as being pacy and powerful because they are.
It is obvious that we have lots of players in the PL whose origins are different. Apart from the obvious skin tone differences, there are other physical differences between players. Players with Asian origins, for example, tend not to be as tall and stocky as Scandinavian players, who tend to be tall and strong. Spanish and Italian players tend to be slightly shorter and less stocky. There are exceptions, but it is a fact that people of different origins tend to have physical differences.
Sportsmen with origins in West Africa - Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Ghana etc - are often tall, strong and fast. It's a fact. Think Pogba, Antonio, Balotelli, Drogba. However, such traits cannot and are not applied to all "black" players. If a player's origins are from East Africa, they are often physically shorter and not as stocky. They are thus less likely to be described as "powerful" or "aggressive".
A lot of British and French players with origins in West Africa are playing in our top divisions, as well as players from West Africa itself. And most who become pros do tend to be tall and stocky, with pace and power. Saying this isn't racism, it's a fact. Obviously it doesn't apply to all players with origins in W Africa, but the fastest, toughest players will be in demand regardless of skin tone, as such traits are condusive to being a good footballer
Certainly, not all white players are "intelligent" or are described that way. If a player makes an intelligent pass it is described as such regardless of his skin tone. And if a player is fast and powerful, that's how he is described.
The fact is that we have many black players in the English leagues that are tall and powerful. Should they not be described as such if they are?