Totally agree.
The Davies signing seemed at the time to be the sort of ‘lazy recruitment’, that the previous gaffer used to accuse other clubs of.
In a panic response to a poor start to the season and with the club failing to get any other signings through the door, we simply went back for a player that we’d already looked at in January and who was now more attainable, irrespective of whether he was what we actually needed.
Picking up on what KeenBlade says, many supporters have watched an awful lot of football and, whilst they obviously don’t have the wherewithal to manage and train a professional football team, the perspective that fans have from a distance can often be clearer than it is for those who are closely involved with the players on a daily basis. It’s the “wood for the trees” point.
For instance, we’ve all seen enough second tier football to know that PNE have been fielding a physically robust side for a good 15 years or so. They invariably have combative players at full-back, centre-half and through midfield. Davies, meanwhile, developed a reputation as a footballing central defender and it’s obvious that he was able to flourish in a set-up where he was not required or expected to deal with the physical stuff; he had plenty of team-mates to do that.
At the Lane, however, he has been added to a side that is already full of players who don’t like, or are incapable of doing, the physical stuff.
Davies is a good player in the right side but for us it was a signing that didn’t address the pressing and immediate lack of physicality in the defence and a soft centre.