Are we missing our opportunity

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Where are you getting your numbers from, none of them are right if you look at the links provided.

89/90 - 28 games in, 30 conceded
88/89 - 26 games, 32 conceded
05/06 - 30 games, 28 conceded


It's Estrella time.......

He's adding total conceded to home conceded by the looks of it.

Damn American reading glasses!
 



Where are you getting your numbers from, none of them are right if you look at the links provided.

89/90 - 28 games in, 30 conceded
88/89 - 26 games, 32 conceded
05/06 - 30 games, 28 conceded
I'd guess Full + home instead of just full or home + away.
 
1989 90
bassetts promotion to the top
after 28 games we had let in 46 goals

http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/division-two-old/1989-1990/table/1990-02-03

so 34 this season is far better

div 3 last promotion
http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/division-three-old/1988-1989/table/1989-02-25
44 conceded after 26

and warnocks promotion team had let in 39 after 30
http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/league-championship/2005-2006/table/2006-01-28
so why all the bleating over us letting in 34

all teams concede goals during a season
generally those at the top who concede less , score less
we are top scorers , but the trade off is conceding a few more

So we have let more goals in than each of these seasons?
We can't just say 10 goals in 4 games just happens it's fine. We have to look at solving this problem. At this rate we need 3 goals to win a game. I understand we play attacking football and therefore will concede more. I don't want the style to change. Let the attacking players attack. We need better defenders.
 
So we have let more goals in than each of these seasons?
We can't just say 10 goals in 4 games just happens it's fine. We have to look at solving this problem. At this rate we need 3 goals to win a game. I understand we play attacking football and therefore will concede more. I don't want the style to change. Let the attacking players attack. We need better defenders.
still not too many goals
pointed out burton had let in more last season
there is no specific number target
goals wise we are 20 plus to the good
some teams emphasise on defence and not letting many in and win 1-0 so dont score as many

we are far more entertaining
 
Always have liked the beard but we don't need to bring him back. Bring Wright back in to the team and rest the beast

Seen lots of people say the same thing, if true is it not a worry that we seemingly rely on one player being not injured/fit?

Surely we should be shouting from the rooftops for a backup?
 
We also won 3-1 at S6 on New Years Day 1952 but Wendy finished the season as champions and we finished in 11th place

Is it better to get the double over Wendy in a season and not getting promotion or Wendy do the double over us but we get promotion?

Leaving Hillsborough on the night we beat them 3-1 with the Bobby Davison double their fans were trying to put things into their own perspective by chanting the fact they had qualified for Europe. Personally I wouldn't have swapped the feeling that night for a European place.

Out of all the big local derbies we (both clubs) seem to enjoy not playing one another. I started watching the Blades in 1964 and I think in over 50 seasons we've only had 17 seasons in the same division.
 
Leaving Hillsborough on the night we beat them 3-1 with the Bobby Davison double their fans were trying to put things into their own perspective by chanting the fact they had qualified for Europe. Personally I wouldn't have swapped the feeling that night for a European place.

Out of all the big local derbies we (both clubs) seem to enjoy not playing one another. I started watching the Blades in 1964 and I think in over 50 seasons we've only had 17 seasons in the same division.

Theoretically, if they'd done the double over us that season instead of the other way round, they would have won the league so not sure their 'perspective' works that well.
 
There's a few discrepancies in this thread in my opinion.

I think someone has pointed out that when CW was appointed, he made some statement that he was going to build his team around characters like Brayford (I think Basham and Scougs were mentioned too), not what he'd say if 'he didn't fancy him'. I think it's fairly certain the reason for him going on loan were purely financial, ie his wages being paid by Burton.

I don't think Brayford is the answer to our current defensive frailties either. He's no CB in my opinion. I think he'd give Freeman a run for his money at RWB or RB but CB?.... not for me and certainly not ahead of JOC or EEL.

The simple answer is to bring Wright back into the centre between JOC and EEL. He can organise them, therefore we should see a happier and better performing JOC and EEL and therefore a better unit. Sorry Bash, too many bad errors for me.

When are people gonna realise, EEL is a defender, he defends, head it clear and kick it clear. He's not Beckenbauer, so why is everyone expecting him to be? If he has to play the ball, then it should be no more than 10 yards to someone who can play. His mistakes are because he needs someone like Wright to tell him where to be and what to do, like he did when he was playing well and everyone thought he was the messiah.
 
MISSION CRITICAL...

No, at least not the one you are thinking of.

Leader One, are you saying that she is no longer with the Beard and she may be 'on the market'.. Fess up, us brother Blades need to know....

Or has she just fallen out of luuurvve with SUFC??
 
I agree Jake Wright needs to come back into the team. He's got quite a bit of pressure on him to perform when he inevitably does come back in as every blades fan has been calling for him.

Wasn't Brayford one of the players Wilder said we should be building around? He knew what his wages were back when he made those comments.
The beard was terrible in the games he played at start of season
 
The beard was terrible in the games he played at start of season

so were the rest of the team.. Looks like Clough is off to Forest anyway, so we may end up with the beard back after all.. Maybe he'll play a couple, maybe he wont, but he comes back into a 'strong' team. Cant see him moving on loan again either as i reckon Clough will join monday'ish and the window shuts 24 hours later soooooooo
 
MISSION CRITICAL...



Leader One, are you saying that she is no longer with the Beard and she may be 'on the market'.. Fess up, us brother Blades need to know....

Or has she just fallen out of luuurvve with SUFC??

I think in this instance photographic evidence should be provided ,to assist us in searching for this fine young lady
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom