blader
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #31
The style discussion is increasingly tedious. If there was one style that worked then everyone would be playing it.
Pragmatism says that the style you play is the one that gets you success with the players available.
If you want to change the style then do it gradually by changing the squad gradually ( Stoke for example)?
By all means try to make it attractive to watch- and the most attractive football I have seen is winning football
And at this stage, when you're up to your arse in alligators, and clearing the swamp is the objective then do you really care if it's done neatly, or quickly?
We are in the 3rd division and Weir wanted us to play like Barcelona- pathetic and naive- you cut your cloth accordingly- welcome Mr Pulis
Sorry, but I don't agree.
Pulis got booted out the door at stoke, because their fans demanded a change in football style, despite the fact they were a stable premier league outfit. Blackwell had an amazing run of form as caretaker and did well as permanent manager, yet no one looks back at his time with fond memories. Good football and winnin football are extremely different things.
I also remember the vast majority of fans after warnock, Blackwell and Adams saying 'I don't care if it takes a few seasons, I'm sick of hoof ball'. Here we are, and yet those fans are now saying 'I don't care, I just want to start winning again, whatever it takes.' Well, I'm still willing to be patient, to see a blades team in the future play good and successful football, which will come in time. Stoke may e successful, but how many football fans really respect them for it?