Andy Gray BeIn Sports Spot on

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

If it's that marginal,then it shouldn't be offside for me...they didn't even take into account it was the end phase of the attack after Spurs had cleared...Feel sorry for McG who had his first Prem goal chalked off.
 



It’s destroying the passion of scoring a goal
This is it for me. Football is all about the euphoria of the goal going in - even when you’re sat on your hands among the home fans. That decision was so bad that even the Spurs fans round me were saying, “just give the goal and let’s get on with the game” - and when we did equalise and I let out a celebratory little “fucking VAR that one then” no-one kicked off.
 
The worst yet decision by VAR costs us 2 points. Yep , saw that coming, it was always going to be us against one of the glamour clubs. Absolutely sensible idea to limit delay time and go with ref decision. Weird aspect is that VAR delays in play might actually help our players maintain their superior intensity that is working for us. We did look a bit tired in last 10 min of the game yesterday when spurs finally exerted some pressure. But yes limit the time and make it clear and obvious for all decisions including offside to stop chalking off perfectly good goals.
 
“Destroying the game” what a load bollocks! Nothing can destroy the game ffs! Talk about going over the top to make a point!
But it is ''destroying'' the game!
The equaliser came up on the screen and it took minutes later to rule the goal out!
What it is like live in the stadium must be even worse.
I am an old git and being a pessimist anyway, means i now won't celebrate a goal until i read the result ...in the Star
 
How can almost 4 minutes of reviewing and a million super imposed lines be clear and obvious? Complete bollocks this VAR, fucking bin it.
Babies and bath water come to mind.
It was brought in for a reason and that reason still exists. It needs to not protect itself but be open to continual improvement. Offside is a matter of fact, there is no subjective view needed, so it’s perfect for VAR. The issue is how it’s being used and the laws it’s enforcing that we don’t like. Should a toe be offside? Does a defender get a touch? Like goal line technology, which is no longer queried, this shouldn’t need human intervention it just encourages errors. That’s the way the technology needs to progress and it’s the laws that may need editing to suit the fans view.
 
It’s about time that the offside law was changed to daylight between attacker and defender....no daylight...no offside. Fair for all and will probably lead to more goals.
 
It's almost getting to the point where some managers and coaches will insist some of their very well-endowed players will have to wear ultra-tight jockstraps.
 
I see 30 seconds being mentioned a lot and it’s a good idea, but I’ve got an even better solution.
If the opposing team can get the ball back to the centre circle and kicked off ready before the VAR has fucked it up then the game continues and the goal stands.

That way the game wastes less time getting a restart because if there’s any concern about it players will want to get the ball back sharpish ready to go.
Also ensures momentum isn’t lost and keeps the game flowing.
Any clear errors should be picked up in that time.
Excellent!
I'm already looking forward to the mass brawls in the back of the net as the neares forward falls on top of the ball and the defenders try to get it back within the 30 seconds!
 
Rod Liddle in today's Times (on the topic of Everton v Tottenham, so probably written before our game yesterday):

"VAR has not eliminated controversy, it has exacerbated it, as I always thought it would. What we have now is a situation where the fans have to wait five minutes at a time for four people to make the wrong decision, instead of just one chap doing so in a split second. No matter how much money rests upon these football games, with their extravagantly remunerated players, there is no real protection against injustices occurring — and never will be, until the robots take over. Scrap VAR right now and let’s go back to abusing the ref."
 
Just bin off the lines and the protractors, if you can't see it without turning the pitch into some kind of bar chart then it's a maths lesson not a football match.
Also let the fourth official or the ref look at the bloody screen while teams are celebrating (isn't that why its there?). Graham Scott was the ref not some chuff sitting in a jumped up caravan.
 
With all the available evidence, it’s really difficult to conclude anything other than the decision made at Stockley Park was premeditated.

UTB
 



On field referees need to have the bollocks to re start a game and go with their original decision if the VAR ref doesn’t come back to over rule them within say the thirty seconds suggested elsewhere.
 
Points made I agree with.

VAR implementation in the EPL is poorer than I've seen it used anywhere else (and I've seen some really poor implementation in Czech).
On-field referee has to have the final say.
Get rid of the graphics and bar chart lines.
Time limit - sure.

And an additional point.

Wear green boots.
 
I've seen it mentioned that we aren't following the FIFA / UEFA implementation guidelines for VAR, anyone know why?

Would a better system be to use the GPS trackers they all seem to wear now. Each player turns into a box on a computer screen easy to tell if in front or not and doesn't rely on frame rates or resolutions? Decision made under 10 seconds.
 
Its embarrassing that they get it right on both occasions but the twats who make the decisions get away with it. Its about time these decisions were allowed to be overturned after the match has ended if its clear the decision is wrong. UTB
If it was the other way around would you have the same opinion?? Because come February we might just hope for it!!
 
Here in Spain there's hardly any controversy the refs take the final say.

As someone who also has to suffer VAR in Spain, I'm afraid I don't agree.

My own team this season scored and the goal went to review. It took as long as ours did yesterday to decide and the only camera they had was on the 18 yard line, the cross and final touch for the goal being on the six yard line. It was impossible for the video ref to make a decision, the only person in the ground who had a proper view of it was the fecking linesman. Nevertheless the video ref annulled the goal which the linesman had allowed.

Also, with regards to the pitchside monitor I'd like to know how many times after the ref run over to that, he hasn't reversed his initial decision. I reckon it will be as close to 0 per cent as it's possible to get because if they go over to the monitor you know a reversal is coming. It just wastes even more time.
 
Fair play to all the pundits calling out VAR.
What would happen if all the prem managers got together and publicly stated they didn't want it and it's gash? Would the authorities listen?

These were the people who actually wanted the introduction of this abomination. They've been screaming for it for years. It's at their behest.

Fuck 'em.

It's fans they should be listening to.
 
If it was the other way around would you have the same opinion?? Because come February we might just hope for it!!

If its clear and obvious then yes 100% oh hang on a minute isnt that what VAR is SUPPOSED to do in the first place. UTB
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom