Incoming? Alan Nixon on twitter

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Ricky Holmes :eek:
Seriously, Ricky Holmes would be an ambitious signing for us?
If so I think we've come to an enpass as we just have a different view of what we consider ambition for our club.
That's not a slight on Holmes or Murphy's ability just the level that we should consider ambitious rather than an expected signing for this level, when we decide to go out into the market and punch our weight.
 

Is that Kent better than Brooks?
Is he the lad who went to Barnsley?
If it is they are the same age and I reckon if Brooks gets 20+ starts then he will at least score more than the Liverpool kid.

That's not me being funny, I honestly don't know how good he is, but is getting a player that was at Oakwell last year "ambitious"?
 
Seriously, Ricky Holmes would be an ambitious signing for us?
If so I think we've come to an enpass as we just have a different view of what we consider ambition for our club.
That's not a slight on Holmes or Murphy's ability just the level that we should consider ambitious rather than an expected signing for this level, when we decide to go out into the market and punch our weight.

Think the budget will increase the longer we are in this division, mistakes from the past have been learnt.

On Murphy though, that for me would be an excellent signing, played a big part in what Brighton achieved last season, and the main thing is he an upgrade on what we have.
Wilder will always be looking to improve the squad and every position, challenge those in the shirt, this move would do that.
 
Think the budget will increase the longer we are in this division, mistakes from the past have been learnt.

On Murphy though, that for me would be an excellent signing, played a big part in what Brighton achieved last season, and the main thing is he an upgrade on what we have.
Wilder will always be looking to improve the squad and every position, challenge those in the shirt, this move would do that.
I'd largely agree but I just don't think he's a player I'd describe as an ambitious signing for us.
 
Not sure if Nixon doesn't mean Boga, looking at it. He is very highly thought of at Chelsea and would be the pace up top we need. I know he said winger but Boga is versatile and ticks many boxes (leaving casual racism out of it :) )
 
I'd largely agree but I just don't think he's a player I'd describe as an ambitious signing for us.
Is that because he used to play for us though, and in an unsuccessful side in the 3rd tier at that? I think, consciously or subconsciously, that will affect people's view of Murphy.

I'm not sure our ambition, at this moment in time, could stretch much further than a Premiership player who played a decent role in a side which won promotion from our division last year. I don't know if it is or isn't Murphy by the way, but I would hazard a guess that most players who could be thus described would be classed in the 'ambitious for us' bracket.
 
Is that because he used to play for us though, and in an unsuccessful side in the 3rd tier at that? I think, consciously or subconsciously, that will affect people's view of Murphy.

I'm not sure our ambition, at this moment in time, could stretch much further than a Premiership player who played a decent role in a side which won promotion from our division last year. I don't know if it is or isn't Murphy by the way, but I would hazard a guess that most players who could be thus described would be classed in the 'ambitious for us' bracket.
Doesn't he have to play at least one game in the Premiership (I'd argue at least 38 but let's stick to one appearence) to be considered a Premiership player?
 
Alan heard "wide man" but was mistaken. The actual bid is for a "wide boy" and it's ambitious because it's Danny Dyer on loan from West Ham's fans. Ambitious because he's a cock and we don't like that set of tossers.
 
The more I think of it the more I like the idea of Murphy coming back to us. Could easily fit within the current formation as a pacy option up front, and would give us genuine width whenever we need to switch formation to 4-4-2.
 
What about the lad who played for Leicester the other night,Ahmed Musa...a winger,played about one game in prem i think,and linked with Hull...maybe out of range financially,i don't know.
 

Is that Kent better than Brooks?
Is he the lad who went to Barnsley?
If it is they are the same age and I reckon if Brooks gets 20+ starts then he will at least score more than the Liverpool kid.

That's not me being funny, I honestly don't know how good he is, but is getting a player that was at Oakwell last year "ambitious"?

What does it matter where they've played. John stones was at Barnsley remember. Now look at him.
 
Forgive me if I'm missing something, but didn;t Murphy play 90mins in the Premier League on Saturday?

If Brighton have made a signing that knocks him down the pecking order then fair enough, but I can't imagine him dropping down to te Championship if he's going to get games at the top level
 
First choice signing 'is a bit ambitious' to me suggest not much chance of it going ahead. Like the coady thing which is dead and buried now.

I'd take lolley - seems quick and direct and certainly we don't have much of that in the squad atm. Sure wilder will pull something or the bag.

Ps - don't know how Murphy wouldn't be an ambitious signing. Played the majority of games as a first choice for a side that got promoted - would be well out of our league to buy outright
 
Forgive me if I'm missing something, but didn;t Murphy play 90mins in the Premier League on Saturday?

If Brighton have made a signing that knocks him down the pecking order then fair enough, but I can't imagine him dropping down to te Championship if he's going to get games at the top level
Yes played the full 90 against Foxes and was a sub against Man Citeh.
 
What does it matter where they've played. John stones was at Barnsley remember. Now look at him.
It doesn't matter in terms of their quality, I just wouldn't class a player from Barnsley as an ambitious target.
I'm not slaging the kid off, I'm just trying to work out who it can be from Nixon's tweet.
 
Rob Staton has pitched in now, looks like there's been movement as he said Wilder has confirmed we'll be making a signing before the weekend and he's hoping for two.
 
Wilder said he's waiting on other clubs to do some business first.
I took that as premiership teams might be buying some players this week meaning they could be sending some loanees our way, but what if the business in the first place is with us? Ie Burton buying someone from us? Maybe to free up some money but maybe as part of a swap deal?
 
Nixon wouldn't say 'very good player' if it wasn't a very good player, so here are a few possible names...

Ryan Kent
Ademola Lookman
Patrick Roberts
Marcus Edwards
Jamie Murphy
Bakary Sako
Jeremie Boga

Most likely to be Murphy though IMO. Being Scottish himself maybe Nixon is likely to big Murphy up a bit. And like Huddersfield, Brighton have recently brought in attacking midfielders which could have made him available.
 
Nixon wouldn't say 'very good player' if it wasn't a very good player, so here are a few possible names...

Ryan Kent
Ademola Lookman
Patrick Roberts
Marcus Edwards
Jamie Murphy
Bakary Sako
Jeremie Boga

Most likely to be Murphy though IMO. Being Scottish himself maybe Nixon is likely to big Murphy up a bit. And like Huddersfield, Brighton have recently brought in attacking midfielders which could have made him available.

Kent off to the Bundesliga I think & Roberts off to Celtic again. Bakary Sako is a good shout, if he regains any sort of from that he had a couple seasons back at Wolves he'd tear this league a new arsehole.
 



Maybe Lolley or Mr Ambitious are the most likely.

Don't see anything happening with Lenihan or Leonard yet.

That would leave a striker as the other possibility. Who could that be? James Wilson maybe?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom