A few observations from the stats (Wendies);

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Coolblade

Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Messages
244
Reaction score
1,443
A few observations from the stats:

• We won the xG battle emphatically (2.27 v 0.29): We didn’t just dominate possession (58.8% v 41.2%), we turned it into meaningful chances. Eleven shots, seven on target, three goals – a 27% conversion rate showing clinical finishing and attacking clarity. Wendies five shots, none on target, underline how well we controlled their threat.

• Aerial duels were ours (64.3% success): We bossed the air, winning 36 of 56 aerial contests. Tanganga (8 wins) and Mee (7) were immense, especially with more direct play. Peck and Campbell chipped in to keep second balls alive, which allowed us to sustain pressure and dictate territory.

• Midfield screening and structure: Peck and Riedewald anchored transitions superbly with 5 tackles, 5 interceptions between them. Peck’s passing (42 at 59.5%) wasn’t perfect, but his defensive work was vital and he had most key passes (3). O’Hare and Brooks knitted play between the lines (the latter with the best tackle stats of the season), while McCallum stretched the pitch with 5 crosses. This balance meant Wendies rarely broke through centrally.

• Creativity came from wide overloads: We attacked predominantly down the right (55%), exploiting Seriki’s pace and Tanganga’s progressive carries. Seriki delivered 6 crosses and completed 3 dribbles, forcing their left side to collapse. O’Hare and Brooks combined for 3 key passes, while Peck added his 3.

• Defensive organisation stayed compact: Even with numbers forward, our back four were disciplined. Tanganga (14 clearances, 2 blocks) and Mee (15 clearances) were colossal. Seriki added recovery pace and 3 tackles. Fact is they managed only 5 shots, none on target, testament to our shape and aerial control.

Individual standouts:

Japhet Tanganga (8.42): Defensive leader, 8 aerial wins, 14 clearances, 2 blocks. Dominated physical duels.

Tyrese Campbell (8.32): Match-winner, 4 shots, 2 goals. Intelligent movement and ruthless finishing.

Ben Mee (8.24): Calm authority, 7 aerial wins, 15 clearances. Organised the line brilliantly.

Andre Brooks (7.80): Pressing machine, incredible 11 successful tackles (next best 3) showed massive impact, also with 2 crosses, 2 shots and 1 key pass. Balanced work rate and technical quality.

Tactics: 4-2-2-2 gave us structural superiority, with pivots screening transitions, full-backs stretching play, dual approach creating overloads. I assume our right-sided bias was deliberate, targeting their weaker flank. Aerial dominance and compactness ensured control in both boxes.

Wendies midfield collapsed under pressure: Our press suffocated their build-up and their midfield trio couldn’t cope with our overloads and aggressive counter-press. Barry Bannan was particularly ineffective. Only 63% pass accuracy, well below his usual standard), minimal progressive passes and no key passes recorded, failed to dictate tempo or escape pressure and often forced backwards or sideways, losing physical duels repeatedly, which killed their transitions.

Summary: We showed possession with penetration, unlike recent inefficiencies. Clinical finishing, aerial control, and disciplined defensive shape turned dominance into a commanding 3-0 victory. Confidence and tactical cohesion are trending upward now setting the benchmark for the season.

A Sheffield double! Crack out the beers.

“Three nil, even Cannon scored…”

UTB!
 



A few observations from the stats:

• We won the xG battle emphatically (2.27 v 0.29): We didn’t just dominate possession (58.8% v 41.2%), we turned it into meaningful chances. Eleven shots, seven on target, three goals – a 27% conversion rate showing clinical finishing and attacking clarity. Wendies five shots, none on target, underline how well we controlled their threat.

• Aerial duels were ours (64.3% success): We bossed the air, winning 36 of 56 aerial contests. Tanganga (8 wins) and Mee (7) were immense, especially with more direct play. Peck and Campbell chipped in to keep second balls alive, which allowed us to sustain pressure and dictate territory.

• Midfield screening and structure: Peck and Riedewald anchored transitions superbly with 5 tackles, 5 interceptions between them. Peck’s passing (42 at 59.5%) wasn’t perfect, but his defensive work was vital and he had most key passes (3). O’Hare and Brooks knitted play between the lines (the latter with the best tackle stats of the season), while McCallum stretched the pitch with 5 crosses. This balance meant Wendies rarely broke through centrally.

• Creativity came from wide overloads: We attacked predominantly down the right (55%), exploiting Seriki’s pace and Tanganga’s progressive carries. Seriki delivered 6 crosses and completed 3 dribbles, forcing their left side to collapse. O’Hare and Brooks combined for 3 key passes, while Peck added his 3.

• Defensive organisation stayed compact: Even with numbers forward, our back four were disciplined. Tanganga (14 clearances, 2 blocks) and Mee (15 clearances) were colossal. Seriki added recovery pace and 3 tackles. Fact is they managed only 5 shots, none on target, testament to our shape and aerial control.

Individual standouts:

Japhet Tanganga (8.42): Defensive leader, 8 aerial wins, 14 clearances, 2 blocks. Dominated physical duels.

Tyrese Campbell (8.32): Match-winner, 4 shots, 2 goals. Intelligent movement and ruthless finishing.

Ben Mee (8.24): Calm authority, 7 aerial wins, 15 clearances. Organised the line brilliantly.

Andre Brooks (7.80): Pressing machine, incredible 11 successful tackles (next best 3) showed massive impact, also with 2 crosses, 2 shots and 1 key pass. Balanced work rate and technical quality.

Tactics: 4-2-2-2 gave us structural superiority, with pivots screening transitions, full-backs stretching play, dual approach creating overloads. I assume our right-sided bias was deliberate, targeting their weaker flank. Aerial dominance and compactness ensured control in both boxes.

Wendies midfield collapsed under pressure: Our press suffocated their build-up and their midfield trio couldn’t cope with our overloads and aggressive counter-press. Barry Bannan was particularly ineffective. Only 63% pass accuracy, well below his usual standard), minimal progressive passes and no key passes recorded, failed to dictate tempo or escape pressure and often forced backwards or sideways, losing physical duels repeatedly, which killed their transitions.

Summary: We showed possession with penetration, unlike recent inefficiencies. Clinical finishing, aerial control, and disciplined defensive shape turned dominance into a commanding 3-0 victory. Confidence and tactical cohesion are trending upward now setting the benchmark for the season.

A Sheffield double! Crack out the beers.

“Three nil, even Cannon scored…”

UTB!

The possession stats that I saw had us on 41.2%, them on 58.8%.
They (not us) 'dominated' possession, but did very little of note with it.
 
Really interesting analysis thanks. Thought Brooks wasn’t at the races particularly first half (Mk. I eyeball) but from your stats he was very good out of posession, just maybe needs to tidy it up when we have the ball.
Brooks in possession is hobbled by having no R foot whatsoever and being expected to play on the RW.
 
View attachment 226070

Any stats to back up this claim? 🫣😵‍💫🥴😆
Ha ha! Just take a second to dissect that.

1: Wilder is so scared of losing these games. Another way of saying that is that he’s a football manager who wants to win these games, and therefore before the game he has a think about how they might go about doing it. Or coaching, as all other 91 league clubs call it.
2: “putting your energy into stopping Bannan.” See point about coaching above. Many modern coaches look at the opposition and identify strengths, and plan to address them
3: “that’s why the little fella sees little of the ball”. Or, he’s a flat-track bully who can do a bit of damage swanning around League 1 when he has bags of time to pick out passes, but struggles when competent opposition stifle him.

The levels of mental gymnastics these imbeciles will undertake to twist normal footballing coaching and tactics into something that Wilder is doing wrong.
 
Suprised some weren't too fussed by brooks - I thought he was tenacious as the tackling stats shows (saw somewhere that 11 tackles is the highest iun the division this season? May be wrong) - He really is a player who needs games as I think physically he can handle himself - sure he played wing back for a bit coming through the youth sides which probably helps with this. It's his decision making that lets him down in big moments - the curled shot he had would've been better played inside for example but as said above, him and seriki seem to have strong awareness of where one another are. Lets hope they can put a run together
 
A few observations from the stats:

• We won the xG battle emphatically (2.27 v 0.29): We didn’t just dominate possession (58.8% v 41.2%), we turned it into meaningful chances. Eleven shots, seven on target, three goals – a 27% conversion rate showing clinical finishing and attacking clarity. Wendies five shots, none on target, underline how well we controlled their threat.

• Aerial duels were ours (64.3% success): We bossed the air, winning 36 of 56 aerial contests. Tanganga (8 wins) and Mee (7) were immense, especially with more direct play. Peck and Campbell chipped in to keep second balls alive, which allowed us to sustain pressure and dictate territory.

• Midfield screening and structure: Peck and Riedewald anchored transitions superbly with 5 tackles, 5 interceptions between them. Peck’s passing (42 at 59.5%) wasn’t perfect, but his defensive work was vital and he had most key passes (3). O’Hare and Brooks knitted play between the lines (the latter with the best tackle stats of the season), while McCallum stretched the pitch with 5 crosses. This balance meant Wendies rarely broke through centrally.

• Creativity came from wide overloads: We attacked predominantly down the right (55%), exploiting Seriki’s pace and Tanganga’s progressive carries. Seriki delivered 6 crosses and completed 3 dribbles, forcing their left side to collapse. O’Hare and Brooks combined for 3 key passes, while Peck added his 3.

• Defensive organisation stayed compact: Even with numbers forward, our back four were disciplined. Tanganga (14 clearances, 2 blocks) and Mee (15 clearances) were colossal. Seriki added recovery pace and 3 tackles. Fact is they managed only 5 shots, none on target, testament to our shape and aerial control.

Individual standouts:

Japhet Tanganga (8.42): Defensive leader, 8 aerial wins, 14 clearances, 2 blocks. Dominated physical duels.

Tyrese Campbell (8.32): Match-winner, 4 shots, 2 goals. Intelligent movement and ruthless finishing.

Ben Mee (8.24): Calm authority, 7 aerial wins, 15 clearances. Organised the line brilliantly.

Andre Brooks (7.80): Pressing machine, incredible 11 successful tackles (next best 3) showed massive impact, also with 2 crosses, 2 shots and 1 key pass. Balanced work rate and technical quality.

Tactics: 4-2-2-2 gave us structural superiority, with pivots screening transitions, full-backs stretching play, dual approach creating overloads. I assume our right-sided bias was deliberate, targeting their weaker flank. Aerial dominance and compactness ensured control in both boxes.

Wendies midfield collapsed under pressure: Our press suffocated their build-up and their midfield trio couldn’t cope with our overloads and aggressive counter-press. Barry Bannan was particularly ineffective. Only 63% pass accuracy, well below his usual standard), minimal progressive passes and no key passes recorded, failed to dictate tempo or escape pressure and often forced backwards or sideways, losing physical duels repeatedly, which killed their transitions.

Summary: We showed possession with penetration, unlike recent inefficiencies. Clinical finishing, aerial control, and disciplined defensive shape turned dominance into a commanding 3-0 victory. Confidence and tactical cohesion are trending upward now setting the benchmark for the season.

A Sheffield double! Crack out the beers.

“Three nil, even Cannon scored…”

UTB!
Blades fans out supported home side 80mins to 10mins.
 
The possession stats that I saw had us on 41.2%, them on 58.8%.
They (not us) 'dominated' possession, but did very little of note with it.
I saw those posession stats yesterday and exclaimed "Bullshit!". Because it obviously is bullshit, we were all over them, no chance in hell the pigs had 59%.
 
Suprised some weren't too fussed by brooks - I thought he was tenacious as the tackling stats shows (saw somewhere that 11 tackles is the highest iun the division this season? May be wrong) - He really is a player who needs games as I think physically he can handle himself - sure he played wing back for a bit coming through the youth sides which probably helps with this. It's his decision making that lets him down in big moments - the curled shot he had would've been better played inside for example but as said above, him and seriki seem to have strong awareness of where one another are. Lets hope they can put a run together
Playing a more standard 442 probably suits him, playing as a wide midfielder, dividing his time between defence and attack rather than as an out and out winger, like say JRS last season whose defensive work was poor at times.
 
I'm not sure how xg works. How come ours was 2.27? Apart from the goals, we had two chances where we had clear one on ones with the keeper and the 6 vs 3 break at the end that we somehow manages to fuck up.
 
I'm not sure how xg works. How come ours was 2.27? Apart from the goals, we had two chances where we had clear one on ones with the keeper and the 6 vs 3 break at the end that we somehow manages to fuck up.
Each chance is assigned a value based on the likelihood of it resulting in a goal (how many times out of 100 would that lead to a goal).

Looking at Sporting Life:

Cannon’s goal was 0.03 xG but his missed 1v1 was 0.64 xG.

Campbell’s goals were 0.21 and 0.13 respectively, not particularly high as both were good finishes and poor goalkeeping.

Bamford’s flick was 0.74 xG, similar to a penalty.

 



I'm not sure how xg works. How come ours was 2.27? Apart from the goals, we had two chances where we had clear one on ones with the keeper and the 6 vs 3 break at the end that we somehow manages to fuck up.
I reckon Ings, Bamford, and Cannon's chances were at least 0.5 each. Both of Campbell's goals would have been fairly high too, with only the 3rd being low since it was so far out.
 
A few observations from the stats:

• We won the xG battle emphatically (2.27 v 0.29): We didn’t just dominate possession (58.8% v 41.2%), we turned it into meaningful chances. Eleven shots, seven on target, three goals – a 27% conversion rate showing clinical finishing and attacking clarity. Wendies five shots, none on target, underline how well we controlled their threat.

• Aerial duels were ours (64.3% success): We bossed the air, winning 36 of 56 aerial contests. Tanganga (8 wins) and Mee (7) were immense, especially with more direct play. Peck and Campbell chipped in to keep second balls alive, which allowed us to sustain pressure and dictate territory.

• Midfield screening and structure: Peck and Riedewald anchored transitions superbly with 5 tackles, 5 interceptions between them. Peck’s passing (42 at 59.5%) wasn’t perfect, but his defensive work was vital and he had most key passes (3). O’Hare and Brooks knitted play between the lines (the latter with the best tackle stats of the season), while McCallum stretched the pitch with 5 crosses. This balance meant Wendies rarely broke through centrally.

• Creativity came from wide overloads: We attacked predominantly down the right (55%), exploiting Seriki’s pace and Tanganga’s progressive carries. Seriki delivered 6 crosses and completed 3 dribbles, forcing their left side to collapse. O’Hare and Brooks combined for 3 key passes, while Peck added his 3.

• Defensive organisation stayed compact: Even with numbers forward, our back four were disciplined. Tanganga (14 clearances, 2 blocks) and Mee (15 clearances) were colossal. Seriki added recovery pace and 3 tackles. Fact is they managed only 5 shots, none on target, testament to our shape and aerial control.

Individual standouts:

Japhet Tanganga (8.42): Defensive leader, 8 aerial wins, 14 clearances, 2 blocks. Dominated physical duels.

Tyrese Campbell (8.32): Match-winner, 4 shots, 2 goals. Intelligent movement and ruthless finishing.

Ben Mee (8.24): Calm authority, 7 aerial wins, 15 clearances. Organised the line brilliantly.

Andre Brooks (7.80): Pressing machine, incredible 11 successful tackles (next best 3) showed massive impact, also with 2 crosses, 2 shots and 1 key pass. Balanced work rate and technical quality.

Tactics: 4-2-2-2 gave us structural superiority, with pivots screening transitions, full-backs stretching play, dual approach creating overloads. I assume our right-sided bias was deliberate, targeting their weaker flank. Aerial dominance and compactness ensured control in both boxes.

Wendies midfield collapsed under pressure: Our press suffocated their build-up and their midfield trio couldn’t cope with our overloads and aggressive counter-press. Barry Bannan was particularly ineffective. Only 63% pass accuracy, well below his usual standard), minimal progressive passes and no key passes recorded, failed to dictate tempo or escape pressure and often forced backwards or sideways, losing physical duels repeatedly, which killed their transitions.

Summary: We showed possession with penetration, unlike recent inefficiencies. Clinical finishing, aerial control, and disciplined defensive shape turned dominance into a commanding 3-0 victory. Confidence and tactical cohesion are trending upward now setting the benchmark for the season.

A Sheffield double! Crack out the beers.

“Three nil, even Cannon scored…”

UTB!
It's ironic that (arguably) our best performance of the season (admittedly against the worst team) came using Selles's preferred formation and what he claimed would be our MO ie intensity, high press, vertical football etc.
 
I reckon Ings, Bamford, and Cannon's chances were at least 0.5 each. Both of Campbell's goals would have been fairly high too, with only the 3rd being low since it was so far out.
Campbell’s were both fairly low (0.21 and 0.13) the 2nd goal was wide and under pressure, the first went through keeper and defenders. Piss poor goalkeeping really and a big shout out to Max Lowe for both.
 
View attachment 226070

Any stats to back up this claim? 🫣😵‍💫🥴😆
Bannan has actually (believe it or not) created more chances than any other player in the Championship this season.

Bad, bad Mr Wilder, doing his job and trying to stop Wednesday’s main/only creative threat from creating. He should let him walk through unopposed next time and stop being so scared.
 
I reckon Ings, Bamford, and Cannon's chances were at least 0.5 each. Both of Campbell's goals would have been fairly high too, with only the 3rd being low since it was so far out.
2/5 correct :)

1764004058772.webp
Campbell did well to get a good shot in for his first, as did Cannon with his goal. Horvath should have saved the second (1 in 8 chance) and the two late on for Bamford and Cannon were apparently 50/50 and both players' shot choice meant the chance was worse than it might otherwise have been.

This also backs up my opinion on the day that Ings' miss wasn't as glaring as some were making out, running full tilt on an angle away from goal with the keeper closing down isn't as easy as, say, Cannon running through centrally one-on-one.

Stats from Opta via fbref
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom