Coolblade
Member
- Joined
- May 11, 2015
- Messages
- 208
- Reaction score
- 1,120
A few observations from the stats: [I appreciate these confirm to a large extent what we all saw!]
- there was a clear improvement in the second half. In the first half we had no shots on target, and an xG of 0.34 v 0.91. We deserved to be a goal down. In the second half we were consistently more threatening with xG of 0.86 v 0.42 with four shots on target. A draw would have been a fair result
- the best outfield player for us statistically was Bindon, with Robbo second. They each won 7 aerial duels amongst other positive contributions. Cannon was ranked lowest with no shots, no crosses, no key passes, no dribbles and repeated lost possession with 64.7% pass completion. He should never be played as a winger (?) again.
- Burrows with most shots (4) joint second most key passes and second most crosses, and Hamer with most key passes (more than double anyone else) most crosses (more than double anyone else) and most accurate crosses were our key creative forces. Barry looks dangerous but does flatter to deceive a bit with most dribbles (2) but no key passes and only three crosses - none accurate. Ditto O’Hare who makes lots of effort with minimal output. Brooks had second most key passes (despite being a second half substitute) with (surprisingly) a 100% pass completion rate. He certainly looked better than Cannon
- Peck as the only real holding midfielder (although he wanders up field frequently) is just too much to ask. Possibly best represented by our tackle success rate being half that of Millwall, with five times fewer interceptions
- the highest rated player on the pitch was Ivanovic with four shots, most aerial duels (for them), an assist etc. He looked pretty useful.
Overall, no excuses. Whilst we were a little unlucky, and their keeper played a blinder, we just have to do better. It’s not good enough. I just pray we keep Hamer.
Back to the pub…….
- there was a clear improvement in the second half. In the first half we had no shots on target, and an xG of 0.34 v 0.91. We deserved to be a goal down. In the second half we were consistently more threatening with xG of 0.86 v 0.42 with four shots on target. A draw would have been a fair result
- the best outfield player for us statistically was Bindon, with Robbo second. They each won 7 aerial duels amongst other positive contributions. Cannon was ranked lowest with no shots, no crosses, no key passes, no dribbles and repeated lost possession with 64.7% pass completion. He should never be played as a winger (?) again.
- Burrows with most shots (4) joint second most key passes and second most crosses, and Hamer with most key passes (more than double anyone else) most crosses (more than double anyone else) and most accurate crosses were our key creative forces. Barry looks dangerous but does flatter to deceive a bit with most dribbles (2) but no key passes and only three crosses - none accurate. Ditto O’Hare who makes lots of effort with minimal output. Brooks had second most key passes (despite being a second half substitute) with (surprisingly) a 100% pass completion rate. He certainly looked better than Cannon
- Peck as the only real holding midfielder (although he wanders up field frequently) is just too much to ask. Possibly best represented by our tackle success rate being half that of Millwall, with five times fewer interceptions
- the highest rated player on the pitch was Ivanovic with four shots, most aerial duels (for them), an assist etc. He looked pretty useful.
Overall, no excuses. Whilst we were a little unlucky, and their keeper played a blinder, we just have to do better. It’s not good enough. I just pray we keep Hamer.
Back to the pub…….