Worksop II
Defectum Heroicis
I am sure, I didn't see Connor Sammon touch the ball last night
Anyone ?
Anyone ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I am sure, I didn't see Connor Sammon touch the ball last night
Anyone ?
Yep, saw that, soon got rid of it thoughHe definitely caught it when the ref blew for full-time!
I am sure, I didn't see Connor Sammon touch the ball last night
Anyone ?
I would be embarrassed and ashamed if a manager brought on a young rookie before me to play up front . Then I would think , I am getting well paid, could be on my way at the end of the season , why should I care a shit .
Perhaps too many I couldn't care a shit thinking .
UTB
I still consider that to be part of the Manager's remit; to manage the attitude of the squad. I make no apology for using Neil Warnock as an example - one look at Rotherham's disjointed squad complete with favourites and "frozen-outs", and the transformation into what they are today, tells me there's a manager who knows how to communicate with players and convince them to believe in their own potential, snap out of their sulks and woes, and get playing together....a different attitude in most of the squad. Very hard to manage...
I still consider that to be part of the Manager's remit; to manage the attitude of the squad. I make no apology for using Neil Warnock as an example - one look at Rotherham's disjointed squad complete with favourites and "frozen-outs", and the transformation into what they are today, tells me there's a manager who knows how to communicate with players and convince them to believe in their own potential, snap out of their sulks and woes, and get playing together.
Yes, I think our two benefactors need to forget about their sulks and woes, and get on with itDon't disagree, but I think the SUFC version is x5 the Millers one, and it seems that Warnock has 100% backing of the board.
I am sure, I didn't see Connor Sammon touch the ball last night
Anyone ?
Fair point, but was it x5 in June?Don't disagree, but I think the SUFC version is x5 the Millers one, and it seems that Warnock has 100% backing of the board.
I would be embarrassed and ashamed if a manager brought on a young rookie before me to play up front . Then I would think , I am getting well paid, could be on my way at the end of the season , why should I care a shit .
Perhaps too many I couldn't care a shit thinking .
UTB
I am sure, I didn't see Connor Sammon touch the ball last night
Anyone ?
It's at the least an interesting enough observation.Jesus christ. The manager gave him a total of 6 minutes on the pitch so it must be his fault.
Fair point, but was it x5 in June?
Jesus christ. The manager gave him a total of 6 minutes on the pitch so it must be his fault.
No matter how hard a striker works and tries, if midfield doesn't even look forward to pass the ball then strikers cannot get involved in the game.
It gets more difficult if the only sensible move is to get rid if just about all your players, and they are coming to the end of their contracts.I still consider that to be part of the Manager's remit; to manage the attitude of the squad. I make no apology for using Neil Warnock as an example - one look at Rotherham's disjointed squad complete with favourites and "frozen-outs", and the transformation into what they are today, tells me there's a manager who knows how to communicate with players and convince them to believe in their own potential, snap out of their sulks and woes, and get playing together.
That I can agree with...The potential for it to happen was there. The chance to avert a good part of it was there.
And this is a big part of the problem, in my mind. I think it's a modern fallacy, managers believing it is their right to completely rebuild a squad. Not a perfect analogy, but imagine that happening in industry. Also, with the average managerial tenure being around 18 months, and player contracts usually being 2 years plus an option, it's a formula that doesn't work.All I would say on that matter is that almost all managers like to work with their own players.
That wasn't the case last June, though. Adkins has allowed this to happen. He's allowed players to disengage with the club.It gets more difficult if the only sensible move is to get rid if just about all your players, and they are coming to the end of their contracts.
Lots of them look like employees who've been served redundancy notices and are seeing their time out. So many so that the situation is almost unique.
I'm not sure what Adkins can do about that.
UTB
Plus time added on, takes it to 10 minutesJesus christ. The manager gave him a total of 6 minutes on the pitch so it must be his fault.
Plus time added on, takes it to 10 minutes
I wonder if the manager realises he takes a bit of time to get "involved"
Probably should have put him on earlier ........................................
Well, Billy hit the post...Out of curiosity, how many times did Sharp touch the ball when Sammon was on? What about Adams? Bet you don't know the answer..... ?????
To be Honest, Bos, I think this has been the biggest issue all season. Too easy and simplistic to look at it and say, this lot finished 5th last season, well below that this season, therefore the manager is shit. I'd say the biggest factor between the two seasons isn't a different manager, but a different attitude in most of the squad. Very hard to manage, especially if you aint getting much help to get rid of it.
I agree, but in our case it should be more like 20.No club should start the season with sixteen players out of contract at the seasons end.
Why? Do you think that has been a factor in our poor performances?No club should start the season with sixteen players out of contract at the seasons end.
Well, Billy hit the post...
edit: Adams, sorry.
All true. It's the fact that he's consistently ineffective. And Adkins' persistence with him, as well as his substitutions, is baffling. Pointing out that he didn't touch the ball in 10 minutes perfectly encapsulates all three of those issues. You read it as a personal dig at Connor Sammon - I see it more as a general head-in-hands observation.I know he did. My point to Worksop was that Sammon may not have touched the ball but how many times did the others around him touch the ball and under what circumstance? DCL gathered it deep and wide on a few occasions but Sammon wasn't thrown on to run the channels and come deep for the ball. If we didn't supply the ball to him, how will he touch it?
He definitely caught it when the ref blew for full-time!
No club should start the season with sixteen players out of contract at the seasons end.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?