Ive got a lot of respect for you mate and dont want to get in to the usual argument about warnock but even you have to admit that the reason adkins is getting crowds like that is because warnock and mccabe built the fanbase up to the biggest its been since the halcyon days of harris currie and woodward
I like bassett ,probably my favourite era as a blade i was 16 and doing away days with thousands of delirious blades on the march through three divisions but watnick deserves equal respect at least as bassett and harris but doesnt get it
For ( in my eyes ) some pretty petty reasoning
I thought I was very fair if you read some of my posts in this very thread defending the bloke and his record. I too had some of my best times a's a blade under Warnock and only an idiot would decry his successes. Any one of us should take where we were under Warnock at any point to where we are today. Him and McCabe built the foundations that should have seen us go on to glorious places, cementing our place in the Premiership and at the very least been a yoyo club between Prem and Championship.
Problem with all this is, it gets very black and white. "Warnock did this", "Warnock was a prick", "no he wasn't". We have all got embroiled in that tit for tat and it just means we all dig in and slug out another session of insults. I'm not trying to do that but equally you have to admit while he helped build something exceptional he in part went and knocked it back down again. That time in the Premiership when we should have gone and got Beattie (for example) we didn't, we accumulated gambles. This is what Warnock did and at Championship level it worked a treat. In the Premiership he got Rob Hulse, which was a stroke of genius. But he also got Akinbiyi and Horsefield for ridiculous fees, which I'll be honest, if I were McCabe I would have got the jitters giving him any money. He got Shelton, Fathi and Seck in. Players when you saw them never looked remotely like Premiership footballers. The much documented Villa game where we folded like a pack of cards, then Wigan when he changed formation and played players out of position which ultimately led to our relegation. Then he did what he always does. Blamed everyone else. Blamed Sean Bean, Blamed (with some justification) Tevez, blames McCabe, blamed the Premiership, blamed his contract issues, blamed Benitez etc etc etc. Then there was the bollocks over his possible job with Portsmouth. Just when we were playing a Derby game against the filth. Basset and Harris never did that.
You are right, he did build something great. Lets forget his attitude and selfishness and look at the achievement in itself. 2003 while ultimately a failure was a brilliant season to be a Blade. I was at Liverpool home and away for the cup semi, I went to Cardiff, the Forest game, they were great days. Cup Semi Finals.
I'll lay it out why I don't see him as an equal to Bassett and hopefully you will at least see my reasoning. Warnock did great things but choked when it mattered the most. He also had 8 years. The only person that let Bassett down was the board selling Brian Deane. Had that not happened we wouldn't have been relegated.
Why wouldn't I want him back is I suppose the big question? In dark times I actually think "perhaps we should" because there is a chance he could do a job and take us up. How brilliant would that be? But I also believe you never go back. It was something brilliant while it lasted. I for one want to hold onto the memories and not have them tarnished by him coming back and it not being the same. Because as much as we cling on to it being like the old days, it won't be.
P.S : He is doing great things at Rotherham and proving me wrong once more. He still can do a job, but I don't want him doing it here because I think we are too sickly as a club for him to do anything about it. It has to be someone new, someone different.
Hope you get the reasoning even if the logic is a bit fuzzy.