Silent Blade
Well-Known Member
Rankine advised Slew badlyWe mugged Blackburn.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Rankine advised Slew badlyWe mugged Blackburn.
Rankine advised Slew badly
Rankine advised Slew badly
I said Rankine gave him poor advice. Yes, in hindsight, we got a good deal but had he stayed with us he may would have developed to become a good playerhow? He probably knew Slew was limited ability wise so he got his client his biggest payday before they clocked on they had been done over.
At the time most of us were fuming when he left us, but hindsight?
Cheers Rankine you bellend!
I said Rankine gave him poor advice. Yes, in hindsight, we got a good deal but had he stayed with us he may would have developed to become a good player
He left us when Wilson didnt pick him in the first few games of the 2011-12 season (Adams had left us by then). Rankine got furious and then advised Slew to put in a transfer request which stunned Wilson and the club. I was told SWFC refuses to deal with Rankine cos he is a nuisance agentHe would also have been exposed to Adams, Wilson and Weir, might have been a good move for him in hindsight.
![]()
I'm sure I read on a forum that someone had spoken to his dad and he was on £7.5k a week.
So, over 3 years he's earned about a million gross and therefore between £500k to £600k net.
I think this demonstrates the madness of football finances. It's more than many would earn in a lifetime.
OK, only a few make it all the way to be a professional, it's a short career etc etc but it just sees to be out of all proportion.
Blackburn were willing to pay the fee and the wages - no wonder they've got into a mess. Their parachute payments run out in 2016, they've got to pray that they make the playoffs before then .............................................
I would give Sheffield United 10k to score a goal in a league match at Bramall lane ,life is about moments and memories , not about how much money you end up leaving.
Not really. If you have a 40 year working life and earn £25,000 a year (about the average wage), you will earn £1M over your working life.
Yes really, you need to look at median earnings not average earnings.Not really. If you have a 40 year working life and earn £25,000 a year (about the average wage), you will earn £1M over your working life.
Yes really, you need to look at median earnings not average earnings.
So he actually signed a 4 year contract and has been on their books for 3.5 years (no idea what severance he'll get).That's £517 per week = £26,884 per year
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/dec/12/uk-median-weekly-pay-is-517-but-who-earns-that
So he actually signed a 4 year contract and has been on their books for 3.5 years (no idea what severance he'll get).
This would take him beyond what 50% in the UK might earn in their lifetime. I'm sticking with what I said it's more than many earn in a lifetime.
I don't disagree it's a lot of money for very little, just taking issue with the idea that £1m is more than "many" earn in a lifetime.
It all depends how you define "many" I suppose. Most people will earn more than £1m in their lifetimes.
Also, i've no doubt that as soon as he got his first big contract he will have got himself a flash car, big watch etc etc. His cash will probably run out pretty quickly unless he's made some canny investments.
Also, i've no doubt that as soon as he got his first big contract he will have got himself a flash car, big watch etc etc. His cash will probably run out pretty quickly unless he's made some canny investments.
Not really. If you have a 40 year working life and earn £25,000 a year (about the average wage), you will earn £1M over your working life.
Not to mention that Slew's money will have to deal with inflation whereas an average wage over 40 years will (typically) keep pace.
Don't get me wrong, someone having earned £1m by their early 20's is a very lucky chap. As I say, if he has any sense, he will have bought himself a home and will thus never have to worry about rent or a mortgage. However, unless he plans on living on tins of soup from Lidl for the rest of his life, he will need to earn some money for a good few years yet. Hence, he will be pretty miserable about his career apparently going down the Swanee.
If he stuck £600,000 in the bank he'd get bollocks all interest. £3,000 a year at current base rate of 0.5%. Of course, I doubt he'd stick all that in a current account, but he'd be doing very well to find a return of 5% (which would give him £30,000 a year).
If he stuck £600,000 in the bank he'd get bollocks all interest. £3,000 a year at current base rate of 0.5%. Of course, I doubt he'd stick all that in a current account, but he'd be doing very well to find a return of 5% (which would give him £30,000 a year).
He's had to live for the past 3 years and I suspect he wasn't living on Lidl soup.
If he bought a house for £300K (he could probably get a decent one in Blackburn for that) and lived relatively modestly on £2K a month, he will only have a bit more than £200K left now. If he tied that up for a couple of years, he would probably get around 2.5% = £5000, less tax at 40% = £3000.
Even when you two are generally agreeing with each other, you still find a way to argue...
I always have trouble with that one too, fact is I think a lot of people will earn over £1m in their lifetime quite comfortably.I don't disagree it's a lot of money for very little, just taking issue with the idea that £1m is more than "many" earn in a lifetime.
It all depends how you define "many" I suppose. Most people will earn more than £1m in their lifetimes.
It's actually a Socratic dialogue....
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?