Shit, you're telling me Conor Sammon has gone to Villa?
Can’t compete
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Shit, you're telling me Conor Sammon has gone to Villa?
I’d be very happy with that kind of deal. I really like O Hare but it would be great to have some up and coming talent … and he’s probably at peak value right now.If we sell O'Hare, we could bring in Cleary and JRS. Two permanent assets, young, on long term deals, with more potential upside. Bring a bit of pace and creativity to the party.
If we sell O'Hare, we could bring in Cleary and JRS. Two permanent assets, young, on long term deals, with more potential upside. Bring a bit of pace and creativity to the party.
Maybe One becomes that target man?if o'hare goes for 7m (personally i would say start at 10m) we could sign both cleary and rak-saki although i would prefer a physical target man striker to come in rather than rak-saki
Fixed it, but brilliant pruningI Cannon see Cleeeeary now O'hare has gone
Big fan of thisI can see Cleeeeary now O'hare has gone
I can see Cleeeeary now O'hare has gone
Here's a novel idea,buy him,then improve him and make him into a 10 million pounds playerDon’t care if he’s the second coming of Leo Messi - I want us to sign him for this reason alone.
If he comes, there's no way this doesn't make it to the Kop. Take a bow.I can see Cleeeeary now O'hare has gone
we have to bring another striker in if cannon goes i know were a bit slipshod with planning but wilder has known for a while about stoke and prestons interest in cannon he must have another striker lined upWith the way our strategy has been this window. Struggling to see much in way of incomings.
Probably a loan if COH goes.
If Cannon goes, tried but will make do with what we've got.
Or for us posh unsFixed it, but brilliant pruning
Depends. If we commit to 1 up front, we have too many. Bamford / Campbell / One should be sufficient. If it would stop Wilder playing 442, I'm for it.we have to bring another striker in if cannon goes i know were a bit slipshod with planning but wilder has known for a while about stoke and prestons interest in cannon he must have another striker lined up
thats not enough for me campbell is finished imo and cant understand wilder giving him another 2 years one is a great prospect but raw and what happens when bamford is injured we definetly need another striker to come in imo but i do agree on 442 all that creates is hoofball and apart from one we havent a target man striker to hold the ball up think 433 is the way forward though for us this seasonDepends. If we commit to 1 up front, we have too many. Bamford / Campbell / One should be sufficient. If it would stop Wilder playing 442, I'm for it.
Only on this forumOr for us posh uns
One cannon Mee Cleeeeary now O’Hare has Chong
o hare money, if we decide to use itWith what money exactly are we going to pay for the lad?
But that's the issue, we won't be using any of it.It’s time to get this lad in
o hare money, if we decide to use it
o'hare and cannon money if those 2 go gerriminWith what money exactly are we going to pay for the lad?
If we don’t then that’s a joke, we have no creativity, where are the goals going to come from?But that's the issue, we won't be using any of it.
Yeh feels like tye McCabe days. Selling best players but with money we will sign Cleary. We’ll tryo'hare and cannon money if those 2 go gerrimin
We have to tryYeh feels like tye McCabe days. Selling best players but with money we will sign Cleary. We’ll try
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?