The idea is great.
Like buying a lottery ticket and becoming a millionaire.
The statistical odds though are.
Winning the lottery, 45 million to one, though this does not prevent people spending thousands over their lifetime.
Since dropping out of the PL under Neil Warnock United had 8 full time managers who only took us in one (sic) direction until Chris Wilder was appointed.
Our noisy neighbours have appointed 9 full time managers in the last ten years who have only taken them in one direction.
So a total of 17 failed managers, 19 if you include Selles and Jocanovic.
So looking at this purely in statistical terms what are the odds that swapping Wilder will progress the club?
Still every football club needs a scapegoat and Chris wilder is it for some of our fans.
He got 100 points in League 1- messiah, build the statue, no criticism, win lose or draw.
He got 92 points 2 seasons ago- not good enough get him out, dinosaur etc.
So is the difference really only 8 points from messiah, to pariah (in a more difficult division).
Or is the difference the level of entitlement of some of the fanbase. Wilder now gets criticised even when we win.
Without Wilder we may never have seen 9th place in the PL and may have spent the last 10 years stuck in League 1.