Gone Elsewhere Anel

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Disagree. He's still pushing them to get Souttar. Not a cat in hells chance we have any other targets, as has always been the case
Yes, you’re right it has. But most of the time he’s had to go for his second options so if what you’re saying is right they must think they’ve got a very good chance of getting Souttar or were financially in a hole & wont be signing anyone

You think of the players he’s wanted in the past most of the time we’ve had to settle for second best. Especially when we were in the Championship with Wilder pre promotion. There was always the Villa joke of every player we wanted they signed.
 



Clubs swapping player and putting players on the transfer list!!! Games so back!!!
 
Singing his name on the KOP on Saturday, it’s a signing that would get some back on board with the owners.

Nevermind.
 
The owners have clearly got loans against the future income installments from Anel's sale to Feyenoord. Clearly they'd rather make sure they get the funds in rather than getting the player back and giving him a contract he wanted this time last year.
 
It seemingly doesn't matter as despite Wilder's interest the club haven't followed up. I could be wrong, but I'm sensing things bubbling up with Wilder.
He's trying to get messages out in his interviews and via Danny Hall.

There's a good chance it all ends in tears.
I agree, Wilders plans seem to have been torn up by the board. However he could have used the Phillips money elsewhere, still don't understand what he offers that the other 4 samey mids do.
 



Weird that Burnley are being rumoured when they have 4 decent CB - Can't see CITY allowing Alleyne to be on the bench and Walker currently CB.
 
Burnley have less money than us
Why do Burnley have less money than us? Don't they get parachute payments?

What I find strange is that apparently we don't have any money because parachute payments are ended, but Stoke can pay £10 for one player.
 
Why do Burnley have less money than us? Don't they get parachute payments?

What I find strange is that apparently we don't have any money because parachute payments are ended, but Stoke can pay £10 for one player.
They have done same as we did & mortgaged against parachute payments last year. So same position as us.

Seriously need to find a way to stop clubs doing that. We & Burnley won’t be the last to end up in a mess due to that strategy.
 
It hasn't stopped the countless sponsors from risking reputational damage being linked to us so im not sure there's merit in that report...Just my view
 
Who do you think he means then as it really only broke a couple of days ago ,he's writing bullshit

I've no doubt we're making enquiries with other players..

But moreover, he might not be referring to anybody. I suspect he's been told by an "internal source" that the ongoing issues are putting players off joining.

I'm asking why that source might be sharing that info and why they're happy for it to be reported.

Forget the players, I'm more interested in what's going off between the club & the media.
 





Ask yourself how Danny Hall knows this. Who is his source likely to be and what is their motivation for wanting this to be made public...

My money is that the info goes to prince abdullahs camp from within and then on from them to Hall.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom