NathTheBlade
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2026
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 13
Once fee agreed, he will be going back to England
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Once fee agreed, he will be going back to England
Bolton have signed several players i believeYou have to worry for the promoted clubs…they need to buy proven premier league players. Not done too much business yet, have they?
If we sign a dynamic midfielder that can last longer than 60 minutes, and isn’t missing for three games a season due to petulance, it’s a job well done.If he stays it makes our transfer business simple - we won't need any more significant signings after Souttar and Phillips
If he leaves we'll have to sign at least one player to replace him. How much will they cost? Will they be a waste of money?
Keeping him and losing him for free really won't lose us that much money, effectively. Not with the level of fee in question
Keeping him might be worth about 6 league positions if he has a decent season. We can be a solid team who always carry a threat. Without him, we're undercooked offensively
He’s on about Cov etc gone to the prem.Bolton have signed several players i believe
Lincoln look in dire straits
Cardiff, not been following them but good pissup and 3 points please
One would indeed follow the other.Once fee agreed, he will be going back to England
Do they replace them with Joe Rothwell?Ultimately every team, other than Real Madrid, sells their best players.
He’s on about Cov etc gone to the prem.
If agreeLike most of us on here, I like Gus, he is that maverick type of player who can create something from nothing and pull something out of the bag, just when we need it.
However, like all of us, he isn't getting any younger, it sounds like he is not interested in a new contract and this might be his last crack at the Premier League (if the Coventry story is true).
So rather than having someone here who doesn't want to be (not saying he won't try, or down tools or anything) maybe best to get someone else in?
Yeh, 16 moments. 4 goals and 12 assists.A few thoughts cross my mind...
1. We're unbalanced as a team with both Hamer and O'Hare being shoe-horned in
2. It doesn't seem to occur to CW that he could rotate them in the No.10 position, or he's been unable to recruit a proper left-winger hence needs must
3. Some of our best football last season was, if I remember correctly, when Hamer was injured
4. Hamer is always going to get suspended at some point
5. Hamer seems unable to last 90 minutes
6. O'Hare is almost always available and runs his socks off for 90+ minutes
I know about Hamer's creativity (though it tends to happen in "moments"), but if we can use the proceeds from his sale to buy a proper left-winger, I think we'd be a better team.
Selling our best creative player to replace him with expensive, injury prone defensive players is about a damning statement as you can make about the current set up at the club.
If Philips is the replacement we need to be very worried.
View attachment 241107Could’ve sworn the we owe them money was put to bed?
Yes.A few thoughts cross my mind...
1. We're unbalanced as a team with both Hamer and O'Hare being shoe-horned in
2. It doesn't seem to occur to CW that he could rotate them in the No.10 position, or he's been unable to recruit a proper left-winger hence needs must
3. Some of our best football last season was, if I remember correctly, when Hamer was injured
4. Hamer is always going to get suspended at some point
5. Hamer seems unable to last 90 minutes
6. O'Hare is almost always available and runs his socks off for 90+ minutes
I know about Hamer's creativity (though it tends to happen in "moments"), but if we can use the proceeds from his sale to buy a proper left-winger, I think we'd be a better team.
El Accounto says no truth in us owing Coventry on original fee. Maybe minor add-on clauses for appearances.
I suspect a properly balanced team might replicate that...Yeh, 16 moments. 4 goals and 12 assists.
Is a proper left winger going to replicate that?
El Accounto says no truth in us owing Coventry on original fee. Maybe minor add-on clauses for appearances.
That's the thing. He has to be training somewhere, just as Sander and Illy were during that ill-fated pre-season.He still has to train, the discussions are above him at club level.![]()
Yet most still feed his ego.Wouldn't trust anything that he said, just another social media attention-seeker
No, he could be saying that we owe money based on appearances. Who knows, we may have to pay an instalment if he plays 125 games for example (he's played 123 for us)So he's saying his 'mate' paid his bit but the new owners might not have paid their bit?
Wouldn't trust anything that he said, just another social media attention-seeker.
With the players currently on the books?I suspect a properly balanced team might replicate that...
Yeah I get that but (a) I don't think he knows and (b) he's only saying it because it suits his agenda of Prince Good, New Owners Bad.No, he could be saying that we owe money based on appearances. Who knows, we may have to pay an instalment if he plays 125 games for example (he's played 123 for us)
That's kind of fine if we're saying Hamer would have been no10 and O'Hare plays at no10 instead, but who's the competition/backup/rotation for O'Hare...? We've not got anyone in to play LW either - where Gus primarily played under Wilder.Yes.
The replacement’ is probably already at the club in O’Hare.
So he's saying his 'mate' paid his bit but the new owners might not have paid their bit?
Wouldn't trust anything that he said, just another social media attention-seeker.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?