I'm not defending drink driving, but I think there is a common misunderstanding (from people of every generation) on what you can legally drink and drive.
From that report, it would show that he had 2-2.5 pints roughly. I know a lot of people who would have that and drive. "It's ok, it was with a meal", "It's only a short drive home" "I drank them quick so it won't be in my system yet"
Even drinking 1 pint would in theory put you over the limit. Messaging needs to change that you shouldn't drink anything. Allowing people to drink a bit, ends up with lack of clarity.
We all make mistakes, sometimes because we don't think, sometimes because we don't know any better and sometimes because we think we can get away with something.
Sydie needs to learn from his mistake and I would suggest helps others to know better too.
A reading of 57 in breath is more than 50% over the legal limit of 35.
He's had quite a lot to reach that.
Certainly enough to have felt the effects of intoxication.
So he's driven a car KNOWING he shouldn't have.
There are many variables which affect the reading : body weight , food in your stomach , how quickly the alcohol was taken , how soon after the intake the test occurred , strength of the beer , liver function , etc etc.
But claiming you've had 2 pints and blown 57 is a bit of a stretch.
Most intoximeter operators I know would say that at 57 you are likely to be well pissed-up.
From personal experience in my work with the police , I drank a pint of 4.5% lager on an empty stomach , waited the mandatory time and blew a reading of just 5.
The stock phrase "I've only had 2 pints guv'nor" is unlikely to be the truth.
Although , as I say , there are many variables and there can be exceptions to what I've said.